His credibility took a hike when he called miracles, 'magic'.
Technology is 'miraculous' AV?
I do not think you're so stupid as to misunderstand the quote as severely as you seem to pretend you are. So stop the charade AV.
Fiction writers technically aren't 'wrong' -- they're fictitious.
I assure you, he's a real person
That doesn't mean they don't have good points, AV. Was 1984 a pointless book? What about 'war and peace'?
My reply to ...
... is: "Indistinguishable to whom? You?"
Precisely, AV. Precisely.
If someone were to show you a device which could saaaayyyy, make apples pop out of thin air or levitate a person, or transport you instantaneously to another planet in another galaxy, or change your body shape into that of a dolphin, how would you know something supernatural wasn't taking place?
You wouldn't. By the same token, if God used the laws of nature to resurrect Christ it looks supernatural to us because we do not know better. This does not make it 'supernatural' - nor any less of a miracle. It would merely mean God made use of that which He has made.
Here -- let me do it for you.
The resurrection was a miracle -- not magic -- miracle.
When a miracle occurs, natural laws stand aside.
No-one is calling that "magic". So stop this senseless straw man tactic and start behaving like a decent person,
please. Is that really too much to ask?
I was saying that if God could manipulate all matter in the universe at any given time it could be it would be a mere cakewalk to resurrect someone without breaking any laws of nature.