Well there are scores of dating methods that do yield ages from single millions to tens of thousands of years. I know not one that yields 6-10k years except for the research for mt-Eve just using human mitochondrial DNA which shows 6,500 years.
And you’ll, of course, ignore that mt-Eve is absolutely not the same thing as the Eve from the Bible.
And no it dsoes not bother me- because all dating methods rely on untestable assumptions of the unobserved unrecorded past that are based on uniformitarian assumptions.
Really?
All of them are wrong?
Okay. Here’s two questions for you.
1) If creationists believe none of them work, why don’t they invest time into making them work, or coming up with a dating method that they trust?
2) Why do the dating methods agree with each? For instance, we can look in varve layers and find ash from a volcanic eruption of which we know the exact date, and they’re in the right layer. And we can date that layer, and it’ll show the right date. Why do things like that happen at all?
Upvote
0