- Jan 26, 2004
- 1,838
- 19
- 70
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
I suppose it's not exactly fitting for Bright Week, but it was honestly the first chance I got (after figuring out that it wasn't going to be a family event after all).
This film has stirred up controversy, even between Christians, and I don't want to start another "should/shouldn't see" debate. I can tell you I'm not theologically sophisticated enough to know why we shouldn't see it, but that doesn't really mean much. For some reason I feel compelled anyway to pitch in my 2 cents about this experience.
In terms of the film's graphic nature, I was surprised to find that there was nothing I didn't expect simply on the basis of what the Gospels say. That doesn't mean that it wasn't grueling to watch.
During the scene in which Jesus was building the table, and Mary was calling Him in, I saw Jesus being human in a way that reflects the image of God in all of us, enjoying the creative work of his hands. If I have any complaint about the film, it's that it could have included more scenes of that kind.
From almost the beginning, though, the fairly overwhelming picture the film gave me was of what the world did to Love when Love came to the world as a man. The world we were all born into is no different, even now. The world meets Love by cringing, mocking, spitting, striking out and killing, because Love is beyond understanding, beyond the grasp of fallen human nature. Love also changes people, and we are (at first) so desparately afraid of being changed.
It isn't about eastern or western ideas of justification or atonement, or whether enough attention was given to the Resurrection (which I thought was very effective in spite of being a brief scene. I saw victory in the expression on that face).
It's about how much He loves us.
Excellent job, Mel.
This film has stirred up controversy, even between Christians, and I don't want to start another "should/shouldn't see" debate. I can tell you I'm not theologically sophisticated enough to know why we shouldn't see it, but that doesn't really mean much. For some reason I feel compelled anyway to pitch in my 2 cents about this experience.
In terms of the film's graphic nature, I was surprised to find that there was nothing I didn't expect simply on the basis of what the Gospels say. That doesn't mean that it wasn't grueling to watch.
During the scene in which Jesus was building the table, and Mary was calling Him in, I saw Jesus being human in a way that reflects the image of God in all of us, enjoying the creative work of his hands. If I have any complaint about the film, it's that it could have included more scenes of that kind.
From almost the beginning, though, the fairly overwhelming picture the film gave me was of what the world did to Love when Love came to the world as a man. The world we were all born into is no different, even now. The world meets Love by cringing, mocking, spitting, striking out and killing, because Love is beyond understanding, beyond the grasp of fallen human nature. Love also changes people, and we are (at first) so desparately afraid of being changed.
It isn't about eastern or western ideas of justification or atonement, or whether enough attention was given to the Resurrection (which I thought was very effective in spite of being a brief scene. I saw victory in the expression on that face).
It's about how much He loves us.
Excellent job, Mel.