• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

I don't understand

MercyBurst

Senior Veteran
Aug 20, 2006
2,570
41
South
Visit site
✟28,885.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
if i tell you " i don't think everything X says has to been taken as literally true" and you to prove me wrong quote X saying : " i have to been taken literally" you are not considering the condition sine qua non i stated before as my opinion so you're not debating with me, you're talking to yourself.
if we are debating the authority of a source, you cannot use that source in the debate, that's what is illogical.

Bianca, you are not a fundamentalist, rather, you are a catholic I see. So what does the pope say? He's the vicar in the catholic faith, and that should pretty well close the book on this issue, shouldn't it? Why listen to some strange doctrine? :confused:

Why should anyone consider filthy detestable acts in christianity? They don't belong. Now if they are forordained to damnation, I guess they can't help it.
 
Upvote 0

teen4jesus92

Waiting is the hardest part
Jan 8, 2005
804
33
33
USA
Visit site
✟23,657.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
...

FACT: The person who condemns you based on your innate sexuality confesses his or her ignorance of the Biblical Doctrine of Salvation.

Ephesians 2: 8,9 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast.

Titus 3:5 He saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of His mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit..."

FACT: Your sexual constitution has nothing to do with salvation.

Romans 10:9 "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

http://www.opendoorcenter.com/myths_&_facts.htm


There is a question here. Once a person is saved (a.k.a. become a Christian) he or she should stop living in sin repetedly, right? 1 Corinthians says, "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!"
Sure, everyone sins, even Christian. But a pattern or lifestyle of sin is a non-Christian thing.

Oh, the word "innate" throws some HUGE red flags up! Why would God say that something is sin if it's acutally innate (or inborn)? I'm sure that he wouldn't!
 
Upvote 0

Bianca87

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
733
41
Oxford
✟23,770.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Bianca, you are not a fundamentalist, rather, you are a catholic I see. So what does the pope say? He's the vicar in the catholic faith, and that should pretty well close the book on this issue, shouldn't it? Why listen to some strange doctrine? :confused:
the Pope as human, is fallible. that doesn't close anything.
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
There is a question here. Once a person is saved (a.k.a. become a Christian) he or she should stop living in sin repetedly, right? 1 Corinthians says, "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!"
Sure, everyone sins, even Christian. But a pattern or lifestyle of sin is a non-Christian thing.

Oh, the word "innate" throws some HUGE red flags up! Why would God say that something is sin if it's acutally innate (or inborn)? I'm sure that he wouldn't!
That is if you view homosexuality as a sin. I do not, and I stand with the gay Christian Churches with the true interpretations. The interpretations that set me free from Satanic strongholds!
 
Upvote 0

savedandhappy1

Senior Veteran
Oct 27, 2006
1,831
153
Kansas
✟26,444.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
if i tell you " i don't think everything X says has to been taken as literally true" and you to prove me wrong quote X saying : " i have to been taken literally" you are not considering the condition sine qua non i stated before as my opinion so you're not debating with me, you're talking to yourself.
if we are debating the authority of a source, you cannot use that source in the debate, that's what is illogical.

Ok, below is the quote I was resonding to.

it's not about choosing to believe in part of the bible, it's about the interpretation of the whole thing. different people in different times and places, people with different cultures read written words differently.
i have my personal opinion about what the bible says and i don't claim it to be an universal truth. i believe not only the bible can be interpreted differently, but is also meant (by God) to be interpreted differently, adapting to different people , times and cultures. that's what so unhuman about it, like a dress, it's different on different people and it's fine this way.
and that's also the reason i believe people shouldn't push their interpretation of the bible on others to tell them how to live their life.

You believe we were debating the authority of a source, hmm, well ok.:scratch: I thought we were talking about what parts of the scriptures can be taken literally or not.:confused:

So I ask what are we suppose to do about the scriptures that tell us to rebuke, reproof, correct, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine?

How can we do the above things if we can't know what is sound doctrine?

Let me ask the question this way. Do you believe the scriptures that tell us to rebuke, reproof, correct, etc. should be taken literally? If not why?

Is it not a fact that the scriptures tell us to use the scriptures for those things so that we might stay strong in the faith? Do you believe the scriptures that say that should be taken to mean what they say, and are they for today or were they only good for the time that they were written?

Thanks!

1 Tim 5:20
20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

2 Tim 4:1-5

1I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
2Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.
3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
5But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

Titus 1:9-16

9Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
10For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
11Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
12One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
13This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
14Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
15Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
16They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

2 Tim 3:16
16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Ok, below is the quote I was resonding to.



You believe we were debating the authority of a source, hmm, well ok.:scratch: I thought we were talking about what parts of the scriptures can be taken literally or not.:confused:

So I ask what are we suppose to do about the scriptures that tell us to rebuke, reproof, correct, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine?

How can we do the above things if we can't know what is sound doctrine?

Let me ask the question this way. Do you believe the scriptures that tell us to rebuke, reproof, correct, etc. should be taken literally? If not why?

Is it not a fact that the scriptures tell us to use the scriptures for those things so that we might stay strong in the faith? Do you believe the scriptures that say that should be taken to mean what they say, and are they for today or were they only good for the time that they were written?

1 Tim 5:20
20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

2 Tim 4:1-5

1I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom;
2Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.
3For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
5But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry.

Titus 1:9-16

9Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
10For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision:
11Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake.
12One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, the Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies.
13This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith;
14Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.
15Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
16They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.

2 Tim 3:16
16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:



MYTH #1: The Bible condemns homosexuality & same-gender relationships.

FACT: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one’s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.


http://www.opendoorcenter.com/myths_&_facts.htm




Get to know the facts:

http://whosoever.org/bible/


Do research:

http://gaychurch.org/Gay_and_Christian_YES/gay_and_christian_yes.htm


read, read, read, read, read. And digest digest digest.


:blush: :sorry:
 
Upvote 0

savedandhappy1

Senior Veteran
Oct 27, 2006
1,831
153
Kansas
✟26,444.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Perhaps we should read tarot cards instead. ^_^ ^_^ ^_^

I'm not sure if that's a good idea because I don't believe that the death card really means that. I believe that they didn't understand death as we understand it today, so they couldn't have a card that really goes with the culture of today.:p :p
 
Upvote 0
D

DMagoh

Guest
...when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.


I dont see the word homosexual used in this verse...

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Romans 1:27

All I just see is:
  • men abandoning natural relations with women
  • men inflamed with lust for one another
  • men committing indecent acts with other men
and because of that, they
  • receive the due penalty for their perversion
How do you misinterpret that?
 
Upvote 0

savedandhappy1

Senior Veteran
Oct 27, 2006
1,831
153
Kansas
✟26,444.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
FACT: No one has the right to point a finger, calling you a sinner.

Romans 3:23 "ALL have sinned (missed the mark) and come short of the glory of God."

FACT: Stating that all sin doesn't prove that we aren't to tell someone that is sinning that they are. In fact 1 Tim. 5:20 says the opposite.

1 Tim 5:20
20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.



FACT: The only ingredient necessary for any person - homosexual or heterosexual - to have perfect peace with God, is faith in Jesus Christ.

Romans 5:1 "Being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ."

FACT: If we don't take the whole Bible to get the true understanding of the word then we will lack some of the things we need.

James 2:17-20

17Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
18Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
19Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. 20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

FACT: The person who condemns you based on your innate sexuality confesses his or her ignorance of the Biblical Doctrine of Salvation.

Ephesians 2: 8,9 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast.

Titus 3:5 He saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of His mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit..."

FACT: Not sure what the scriptures that you posted have to do with what you stated as a fact?:scratch: :confused:

Second, calling a sin a sin and rebuking, reproofing and correcting someone is scripturial. (I have already posted some of those scriptures, so won't do that again) Posting the scriptures that say who will not inherit the Kingdom of God, is just showing why someone believes what they are stating as fact. If that is taken as condemning, then I would just remind people that it isn't my words, but words taken from the inspired word of God.

FACT: Your sexual constitution has nothing to do with salvation.

Romans 10:9 "If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved."

FACT: The Bible states in many places that sexual sins, along with other sins, will cause people to not inherit the Kingdom of God. I will list just one below.

Gal. 5:16-21
16This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.

17For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.
18But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
19Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, 21Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

We see in the Bible how a person is washed clean when they confess and repent unto salvation. Those sins are remember no more, by God, we are also told in the scriptures. Yet, I have not seen any scripture that says someone is saved if they refuse to believe that stealing is a sin, and continue to do it after they profess Christ. Not saying that we don't sometimes repeat a sin we have ask forgiveness for, but the key here is refusing to believe what we are doing is a sin.

In Revelation we see how the church at Thyatira allowed a Jezebel, who called herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce the Lords servants.

Than we see how when the Jezebel refused to repent what her and those that believed her and her doctrine would have to go through because of this. Thankfully also seeing how those who didn't follow her doctrine were saved from any more burden.

I think I will just post the scriptues and people can interpretate them for themselves. I did highlight some parts of the scriptures I felt were important, knowing that others may feel other parts of these verses are more important. Or that they might have a different understanding of these scriptures. I hope that those who might find something else in the meaning of the scriptures to please post your thoughts so we can consider it as we strive to increase our wisdom and understanding of the word.

Thanks!

Rev. 2;18-29
18And unto the angel of the church in Thyatira write; These things saith the Son of God, who hath his eyes like unto a flame of fire, and his feet are like fine brass;

19I know thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and thy patience, and thy works; and the last to be more than the first.
20Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.
21And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.
22Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.
23And I will kill her children with death; and all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according to your works.
24But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.
25But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.
26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.
28And I will give him the morning star. 29He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.
 
Upvote 0

teen4jesus92

Waiting is the hardest part
Jan 8, 2005
804
33
33
USA
Visit site
✟23,657.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I dont see the word homosexual used in this verse...

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Romans 1:27

All I just see is:
  • men abandoning natural relations with women
  • men inflamed with lust for one another
  • men committing indecent acts with other men
and because of that, they
  • receive the due penalty for their perversion
How do you misinterpret that?

DMagoh is right, davedjy. In fact, there are lots of references in the Bible that are against homosexuality that don't actually say, "homosexual". (like the one above)
... But they're still against homosexuality. Again, how do you misinterpret that? Or, how can anyone read this and say homosexuality is perfectly okay? :confused:
 
Upvote 0

teen4jesus92

Waiting is the hardest part
Jan 8, 2005
804
33
33
USA
Visit site
✟23,657.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
...and I stand with the gay Christian Churches with the true interpretations. The interpretations that set me free from Satanic strongholds!

So, you believe in the interpretations that "set you free" from Satan? Or... make you okay when you sin?
Hmmmm....:confused:
Again, how can anyone read the above verses and misinterpret them. How 'bout you tell us what you think they mean.
 
Upvote 0

savedandhappy1

Senior Veteran
Oct 27, 2006
1,831
153
Kansas
✟26,444.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
MYTH #1: The Bible condemns homosexuality & same-gender relationships.

FACT: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one’s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.

http://www.opendoorcenter.com/myths_&_facts.htm




Get to know the facts:

http://whosoever.org/bible/


Do research:

http://gaychurch.org/Gay_and_Christian_YES/gay_and_christian_yes.htm


read, read, read, read, read. And digest digest digest.


:blush: :sorry:

Have and continue to do research!!!!

Frankly, for anyone to think that those who stand on what the scriptures say wouldn't love to be able to find where they were wrong. Is totally wrong.

I would love to say that you are right and you will be in heaven with me someday, but with all the research I have done so far that isn't the case.

I will continue to search for the truth and if the Lord shows me that either 1) it isn't a sin or 2) you can be saved inspite of this unrepented sin then I will be dancing and praising the Lord for all the wonderful people I will be in heaven with.

Until then I will continue to stand on what the scriptures tell me to do, reprove, rebuke, correct, etc. I will continue to tell a person that what they are doing is a sin, also as the scriptures tell me to do.

1 Tim 5:20
20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.


Unfortunently, I will be continuely called a hater, bigot, closed minded, etc. These labels will not stop me from doing what I feel the Lord has told us to do.


Good Day All! I have others things to do.:wave:
 
Upvote 0

MercyBurst

Senior Veteran
Aug 20, 2006
2,570
41
South
Visit site
✟28,885.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So, you believe in the interpretations that "set you free" from Satan? Or... make you okay when you sin?
Hmmmm....:confused:
Again, how can anyone read the above verses and misinterpret them. How 'bout you tell us what you think they mean.

You're asking the fox to guard the henhouse!!!!^_^
 
Upvote 0

Bianca87

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
733
41
Oxford
✟23,770.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
MercyBurst, I just laughed! :) Good point.
teen, you presented yourself as someone who was so confused and doubtful about the whole issue, when you clearly had a crystal clear opinion from before. a little bit disloyal , don't you think?
</IMG>
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,100
6,132
EST
✟1,119,989.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
[SIZE=-1]MYTH #1: The Bible condemns homosexuality & same-gender relationships.

FACT: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one’s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.[/SIZE]

Homosexual Urban Myth #12: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one’s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.

FACT: Both Hebrew and Greek had words to describe a person who had sex with another person of the same gender. Here are some of those words, from the links below.

• "sodomy,”
• “filth of sodomy,”
• ”lawless lust,”
• “lust,”
• “impurity,”
• “works of the flesh,”
• “carnal,”
• “lawless intercourse,”
• “shameless,”
• “burning with insane love for boys,”
• “licentiousness,”
• “co-habitors with males,”
• “lusters after mankind"
• “monstrosities”
• "Men play the part of women"
• "giving of the body to feminine purposes"

Recent posts: REAL evidence from Talmud, and other ancient Jewish writings, Link

REAL evidence from early church fathers, Link

FACT: From the time Moses delivered the law, to the Israelites, ca. 1200 BC, until the present, Jewish scholars interpreted the O.T. scriptures as condemning ALL same gender sex acts; by ALL persons, male and female; at ALL times, in ALL places, and under ALL circumstances, NO exceptions or exclusions.

The early church fathers, from 50 AD to 400 AD, also interpreted the N.T. scriptures as condemning ALL homosexual acts, with NO exceptions or exclusions.

The ancient Jewish scholars and the ECF did NOT even mention, and did NOT limit the condemnation of homosexual acts to, “homosexual rape,”“temple prostitution,”“enslaved boy prostitutes,”“effete, jaded Roman nobles,” pagan temples and/or pagan religious activities!
 
Upvote 0

Bianca87

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
733
41
Oxford
✟23,770.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Quote:
Originally Posted by davedjy
[SIZE=-1]MYTH #1: The Bible condemns homosexuality & same-gender relationships.

FACT: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one&#8217;s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.


Homosexual Urban Myth #12: There is not one condemnation of homosexuality as one&#8217;s innate sexual constitution in the Scriptures. In fact, any reputable Bible scholar will tell you that when the original manuscripts were written in the languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, in none of these languages did the word "homosexual," or any viable translation of the word, exist.

FACT: Both Hebrew and Greek had words to describe a person who had sex with another person of the same gender. Here are some of those words, from the links below.

&#8226; "sodomy,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;filth of sodomy,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8221;lawless lust,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;lust,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;impurity,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;works of the flesh,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;carnal,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;lawless intercourse,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;shameless,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;burning with insane love for boys,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;licentiousness,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;co-habitors with males,&#8221;
&#8226; &#8220;lusters after mankind"
&#8226; &#8220;monstrosities&#8221;
&#8226; "Men play the part of women"
&#8226; "giving of the body to feminine purposes"

Recent posts: REAL evidence from Talmud, and other ancient Jewish writings, Link

REAL evidence from early church fathers, Link

FACT: From the time Moses delivered the law, to the Israelites, ca. 1200 BC, until the present, Jewish scholars interpreted the O.T. scriptures as condemning ALL same gender sex acts; by ALL persons, male and female; at ALL times, in ALL places, and under ALL circumstances, NO exceptions or exclusions.

The early church fathers, from 50 AD to 400 AD, also interpreted the N.T. scriptures as condemning ALL homosexual acts, with NO exceptions or exclusions.

The ancient Jewish scholars and the ECF did NOT even mention, and did NOT limit the condemnation of homosexual acts to, &#8220;homosexual rape,&#8221;&#8220;temple prostitution,&#8221;&#8220;enslaved boy prostitutes,&#8221;&#8220;effete, jaded Roman nobles,&#8221; pagan temples and/or pagan religious activities![/SIZE]
deja-vù?


it's the 10th time i read this!!!!!!!
 
Upvote 0

teen4jesus92

Waiting is the hardest part
Jan 8, 2005
804
33
33
USA
Visit site
✟23,657.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
teen, you presented yourself as someone who was so confused and doubtful about the whole issue, when you clearly had a crystal clear opinion from before. a little bit disloyal , don't you think?
</IMG>

I'm sorry, maybe it was bit dishonest. :sorry: (Not disloyal, but dishonest) I felt that if I told everyone what I thought I would not be answered truthfully. I felt like I would just be passed off as crazy or "judemental" and not told what I wanted to know.
But my opinion wasn't "crystal clear", per say. I have a Christian friend who says homosexuality is perfectly okay, and I live in a world that says "anything goes" in terms of people's truth claims. I also have parents against homosexuality and I go to a school and attend a church that are both against it as well. And, of course, I have a Bible that speaks pretty clear on the subject. :scratch: So, I guess I was not "confused", just feeling unrest inside about these two conflicting sides, and I wanted to know the truth.
I haven't received many convincing arguments on the pro-homosexuality side, though. And the Bible is still my #1 truth. I guess my original "opinion" was right after all.
Any comments?
 
Upvote 0