Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Backwards again. You do not need a hypersonic round to have an effective weapon. .223 bullets can have velocities exceeding 3,000 feet per second. They will still kill very easily at half that speed if one can aim.Everything about it. It's total nonsense.
It would render many rounds completely useless.
You apparently don't understand how bullets work.
No. I want to avoid that. I could accuse you of wanting no private gun owners since an all or nothing demand quite often ends up with nothing.So we now see what you really want. No private gun owners.
You are now only applying this to only one caliber? How do you think it's going to be enforceable?Depending upon the distance one is firing one may have to adjust a scope a bit for a slower round, but aside from that why do you think that they would not work?
You have not even been paying attention? I guess that appears to be the case since all you have is denial and no ability to support your claimsSo what is the point again?
Did I even imply that? I was using the .223 as on example. And it is easy to limit what a manufacturer sells. We already do that. You will not find an open market for tracer rounds. There is no reason that they could not be made, wisely the government decided that shooting literally "hot lead" is not a good idea in forest lands.You are now only applying this to only one caliber? How do you think it's going to be enforceable?
Reloaders will just laugh and load em as they like.
" Joe, you know that ammo you sold me, it's just loaded way too hot. There go my plans to go shoot up the high school tomorrow. I was gonna commit mass murder but my conscience will just not allow me to do it with illegal bullets!"Did I even imply that? I was using the .223 as on example. And it is easy to limit what a manufacturer sells. We already do that. You will not find an open market for tracer rounds. There is no reason that they could not be made, wisely the government decided that shooting literally "hot lead" is not a good idea in forest lands.
The problem is that some rounds are far too destructive due to the amount of powder used to propel them.
A sad joke is all that you have? Seriously?" Joe, you know that ammo you sold me, it's just loaded way too hot. There go my plans to go shoot up the high school tomorrow. I was gonna commit mass murder but my conscience will just not allow me to do it with illegal bullets!"
Wow! Again with a strawman argument. You keep admitting that you are wrong with you debating techniques. People that can support their arguments do so. You only appear to have an irrational fear of losing your guns. Ironically you make it more likely to happen, not less, by opposing reasonable laws and regulations.Rotflol! Still in your fantasy world where hot loaded . .223's are the ultimate weapon of mass destruction, I see! Ever think that a person could just use a bigger bullet and do more damage? No, of course not, the .223 in your world is meaner than a .50 BMG.
Let's start with the glaring one: it's impossible to have a standardized amount of powder allowed in all the different calibers. The minimum amount needed to stabilize one bullet is going to far exceed the maximum amount safely used in another bullets casing.A sad joke is all that you have? Seriously?
You might as well admit that you have no valid complaints.
I'm not ignoring anything. I would much rather have at least a .243 if shooting something the size of a deer... it is about knock down power. If someone is trying to kill you, you want a round that stops them now, not one that can go straight through with minimal damage. Of course with perfect shot placement, even a .22 bullet is lethal. But for stopping someone charging at you? Why would you not want to maximum impact? How many bullet wounds have you examined?
For home defense, it would be hard to beat a 12 guage with 00 buckshot. You don't need precise shot placement when you have several .38 sized balls spreading out.
Not to mention a rabid badger
The size of the cartridge is not what would be banned. It is the amount of powder behind a round that would need to be limited. One is far less likely to over power a larger round since then one begins to have some serious problems with recoil. A small caliber gun with a very hot round, such as many current .223 cartridges are worrisome because they do allow multiple shots in quick succession without lost of control of the firearm. That along with huge clips can make "pray and spray" an effective method of attack. Try that with a .30-06. Regular rounds have a fairly high recoil.
that is crazyThose with criminal intent and live in areas with strict gun control have figured this out. That's why attacks and killings are up with knives. The result? Knife control: Knives taken off supermarket shelves in New Zealand after terrorist attack
A few inches is still better than a single projectile.
I actually have turkey loads instead of buckshot but I don't have any close neighbors to worry about either.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?