B
bluelime2
Guest
David murdered one of his best soilders to cover up the fact that he'd slept with the mans wife. The cost was the life of his son. Since it was probably widely known over time, particualarly regarding the child, he possibly would have lost a lot of respect and face with the nation. Not fun when you've so openly trusted and worshipped God throughout your life and rule as king.
People can perhaps say 'but the child died and he was innocent' - if you look at the context, he would likely have been rejected by the nation as king in the future because of the illigitamacy which could have spelled death at the hands of his brothers. It also tells us later on reagarding one of the wicked kings of Israel that God took the life of one of his children 'because something was found in him that pleased the lord' whereas the rest of the family were slaughtered for their wickedness. So God can take a childs life to save them.
But anyway.
The point is, David was still called 'a man after Gods own heart' and was the best king Israel ever had. He was a mighty man of God. He stuffed up. The two don't automatically cancel each other out.
(So did Sampson, Gideon, Abrahem, Jonah, Noah, Peter, Paul).
People can perhaps say 'but the child died and he was innocent' - if you look at the context, he would likely have been rejected by the nation as king in the future because of the illigitamacy which could have spelled death at the hands of his brothers. It also tells us later on reagarding one of the wicked kings of Israel that God took the life of one of his children 'because something was found in him that pleased the lord' whereas the rest of the family were slaughtered for their wickedness. So God can take a childs life to save them.
But anyway.
The point is, David was still called 'a man after Gods own heart' and was the best king Israel ever had. He was a mighty man of God. He stuffed up. The two don't automatically cancel each other out.
(So did Sampson, Gideon, Abrahem, Jonah, Noah, Peter, Paul).
Upvote
0