Then you don't kill them, which means you don't fit my criteria in the OR.
You can not win this.
You can not win this.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Spinrad said:Then you don't kill them, which means you don't fit my criteria in the OR.
You can not win this.
As soon as you took the members communication out of context for the mocking, one side had already lost... and it wasn't me. Lokisdottir said:I think hunting, if it is to be done, should be done without guns.
Use a bow and arrow. Or better yet, a knife.
It's not much of a sport if one side has all the power.
No, that's not what I'm assuming. But think of it this way: one side has the all-powerful touch of death at his fingertips, and the other side has... a couple of pointy sticks attached to his head, along with improved hearing. Yeah, that's an even fight, huh?skinner said:One side has a weapon of some sort, the other side has superior power of all the senses, actually makes it somewhat even. Maybe you assume that having a rifle always makes hunting easy. Not.
Because nobody hunts purely for food. If all they wanted was a bite to eat, they'd go to the grocery store. There's always a sporting element.Anyway, if we are hunting for food, why should we make things especially sporting? Yeah, I'm gonna jump out of a tree onto a deer, that should be a nice, clean, humane kill!![]()
Lokisdottir said:Because nobody hunts purely for food. If all they wanted was a bite to eat, they'd go to the grocery store. There's always a sporting element.
christianmarine said:Is hunting immoral? I like to ask questions of these sorts, as noone can come up with a clear answer.
As an outdoorsman, I enjoy the time I spend hunting. Not because I get to kill something, but simply because I can be alone with the wonderful scenery that the Lord made for us.
christianmarine said:Is hunting immoral? I like to ask questions of these sorts, as noone can come up with a clear answer.
As an outdoorsman, I enjoy the time I spend hunting. Not because I get to kill something, but simply because I can be alone with the wonderful scenery that the Lord made for us.
psychedelicist said:I find it funny that the majority of the thread does not like hunting because it is killing, especially when hunting just for sport rather than survival. What I think they forget is that animals kill each other all the time in nature, often for more pointless reasons than sports. Granted, we are the dominant species on the planet, and I'm sure with our intelligence we can find ways around killing. But to call hunting for sport "immoral" is like calling ant colonies that kill each other over territory "immoral" as well.
I myself do not hunt for sport, I have hunted before but it's just not really my thing. But I gotta admit, venison thats that is that fresh tastes much better than store boughtIf I was to actually have to hunt for survival I would have no qualms about it, though.
freewilly said:animals don't kill for sport, unlike us.
psychedelicist said:No, but many will kill one another over who gets which mate, or in my ant example, for no seeable reason at all except for territorial reasons perhaps. The point is, they kill for non-survival reasons, so to say that we as humans are immoral in doing so, would also have to admit that many animals also behave immorally as well.
freewilly said:WEll first I didn't say it was immoral and second:
EVerything animals do is to survive. Territorial is survival.
If a lion deos not protect its' trritory than that means less food for him/her.
I take it you don't eat your meat from living animals. You could.
12volt_man said:What I'm not looking forward to is having to cull these large herds of deer, that are now overpopulated, diseased, starving, causing injury to drivers, and crop damage because of the people who said, "we can't hunt them, they're too cute".
That's a terrible waste that could have been avoided if not for the people who wanted to save the deer.
Ironic that the people who keep telling us how much more compassionate and morally superior they are because they don't hunt, while we do, are causing the worst suffering to the animals they claim to care about.