I agree. He has absolutely no intent of discussing anything or even trying to understand the theory of evolution.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes your trolling is. Almost as rediculous as how many people still take you seriously and try to respond to your antics sincerely.
Humans are indeed apes. It's our classification. You can mess with the words all you wish but...
Humans are apes.
That is not what the Bible says. The Bible says that the people listed in Luke were decendents of Adam and Eve. Even the Bible says that the Gentiles are not descendants of Adam and Eve. That is why we are adopted into the family. Or we are a wild branch grafted onto the natural tree.
I agree. He has absolutely no intent of discussing anything or even trying to understand the theory of evolution.
I might believe you except you go on to say, ...I understand evolution, ...
... and the theory of evolution says nothing of the kind. So you don't understand the theory of evolution. To even hint at the only other possible explanation for posting such a falsehood, would probably get me banned from this forum. (Truth is not a defense.)...it is saying that one genus can interbreed with another genus, ...
That's right. If we did see one genus crossbreeding with another it would be strong evidence against the theory of evolution, and biologists or even non-professuionals would have noticed.... which we don't see. Even with billions of years of evolution in the middle.
I might believe you except you go on to say, ...
... and the theory of evolution says nothing of the kind. So you don't understand the theory of evolution. To even hint at the only other possible explanation for posting such a falsehood, would probably get me banned from this forum. (Truth is not a defense.)
That's right. If we did see one genus crossbreeding with another it would be strong evidence against the theory of evolution, and biologists or even non-professuionals would have noticed.
how can apes and humans have a common ancestor if one genus didn't cross breed with another genus somewhere down the line?
your being silly
Humans share a common ancestor with the other great apes, most recently with the chimps. Some of the common ancestral species evolved into humans and some evolved into the common ancestor of chimps and bonobos. In other words, they quit interbreeding. And now the can't, or at least, they don't.how can apes and humans have a common ancestor if one genus didn't cross breed with another genus somewhere down the line?
Let's start with the basics. Do you understand the difference between an ancestor and a descendent?your being silly
how can apes and humans have a common ancestor if one genus didn't cross breed with another genus somewhere down the line?
your being silly
Humans share a common ancestor with the other great apes, most recently with the chimps. Some of the common ancestral species evolved into humans and some evolved into the common ancestor of chimps and bonobos. In other words, they quit interbreeding. And now the can't, or at least, they don't.Let's start with the basics. Do you understand the difference between an ancestor and a descendent?
there is no purposeful difference between ancestor and descendent in my opinion, that is a distinction only evolutionists carry to promote their agenda.
secondly, you prove my point thank you.
I mean you confessed that "they quit interbreeding"
so two genuses must have interbred somewhere down the line of things.
even if it took millions of years.
you have no evidence of this whatseover, and this is what is silly.
Oh my!there is no purposeful difference between ancestor and descendent in my opinion, that is a distinction only evolutionists carry to promote their agenda.
When they quit interbreeding they were still the same species. At the point in time that they could no longer interbreed, they became different species, but they were still the same genus.secondly, you prove my point thank you.
I mean you confessed that "they quit interbreeding"
so two genuses must have interbred somewhere down the line of things.
Well, there are biochemistry, genetics, embryology, and the fossil record. But if you haven't actually looked at and understood these things, I can see why you might say that.even if it took millions of years.
you have no evidence of this whatseover, and this is what is silly.
go ahead and tell me in your own words, if you understand your own theory (that is)
there is no purposeful difference between ancestor and descendent in my opinion, that is a distinction only evolutionists carry to promote their agenda.
secondly, you prove my point thank you.
I mean you confessed that "they quit interbreeding"
so two genuses must have interbred somewhere down the line of things.
even if it took millions of years.
you have no evidence of this whatseover, and this is what is silly.
Did you bother reading the OP?Phred said:Humans are indeed apes. It's our classification. You can mess with the words all you wish but...
Humans are apes.
Why is this thread back up?
Did you bother reading the OP?
Tiberius said:Ape, meaning an animal in the category:
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorrhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Parvorder: Catarrhini
Superfamily: Hominoidea
I fail to see how anything in the OP shows this to be wrong. Seems that the OP is just trying to use wordplay to disprove the fact that Humans and Chimps are in the same group, whatever you want to call it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?