Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!

[David Hine7]

You will find all secular guesses come from desparation to challenge God. The rule is "If the Word of God runs counter to your guesses, your guesses are wrong and will cause you deep embarrasment, and your pride a joke". There is nothing in those following equations that runs counter to God's Word:-

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc


Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........

Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C.

=============================================================================================
Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring light years as years only.

 

[sjastro]

Squinting through the eyepiece of a telescope won't tell you much about the universe. It's a fake claim to compare that to history books written by poeple of the past who were there. The Bible is also a History book of the events of Creation, where the Prophets, such as Moses and Isaiah were in direct communication with God, the Creator who explained to them about Creation. Do YOU claim what you see when squinting through your telescope reveals more than God's Word?? Remember, God did it!!!

It is not a fake claim as you were not there to witness Moses and Isaiah or even definitively state they existed.
Since you seem to be alluding to Edwin Hubble get your facts straight, he was part of a scientific process where observation supported a theory.
One of the proponents of the Big Bang theory was the scientist/priest Georges Lemaître.
It was Lemaître who came up with an early estimation of the age of the universe of 2 billion years.
Are you one of these narrow minded creationists who would think this would make Lemaître a lesser Christian or not one at all?

 

[sjastro]

You will find all secular guesses come from desparation to challenge God. The rule is "If the Word of God runs counter to your guesses, your guesses are wrong and will cause you deep embarrasment, and your pride a joke". There is nothing in those following equations that runs counter to God's Word:-

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc


Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........

Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C.

=============================================================================================
Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring light years as years only.

Repeating the same idiotic nonsense does not make it right.

 

[Yttrium]

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc. God did it!!!

This short work supports the universe was Created by God. The Hubble Constant, Ho, (universe expansion) is central to Creation.
The equations here are HATED by secular science, BECAUSE they support that God Created the universe and the maths framework that controls it:-

Huh. Personally, I would love it if God created the universe. I'm not following your reasoning, though. Even if the equation somehow worked the way you think it does, what does that have to do with God?

 

[David Hine7]

It is not a fake claim as you were not there to witness Moses and Isaiah or even definitively state they existed.
Since you seem to be alluding to Edwin Hubble get your facts straight, he was part of a scientific process where observation supported a theory.
One of the proponents of the Big Bang theory was the scientist/priest Georges Lemaître.
It was Lemaître who came up with an early estimation of the age of the universe of 2 billion years.
Are you one of these narrow minded creationists who would think this would make Lemaître a lesser Christian or not one at all?

Lamaitre was not using the universe expansion (first reported by Isaiah Ch. 40, and later by Hubble) as a challenge to God. Lamaitre claimed he was studying God's Creation (which is what non currupted PROPER non corrupted science is about) so that point you make is an invalid accusation of the integrity of Lamaitre as a worker for God.. .

 

[David Hine7]

Huh. Personally, I would love it if God created the universe. I'm not following your reasoning, though. Even if the equation somehow worked the way you think it does, what does that have to do with God?

First understand the equations, but if you can't just accept them as truth.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I am absolutely failing to understand the point of this thread, except for the OP's weird desire to bash non-believers because he thinks he's worked out an entirely different speed of light... which has exactly WHAT to do with God?

 

[Hans Blaster]

You will find all secular guesses come from desparation to challenge God. The rule is "If the Word of God runs counter to your guesses, your guesses are wrong and will cause you deep embarrasment, and your pride a joke". There is nothing in those following equations that runs counter to God's Word:-

If I wanted to challenge you god, I would use the Bible. This is not the place for that. This is a place for discussing science topics.

Hubble Constant (Ho) fixed to light speed, C and calculated as 71 k/s/Mpc


Ho is now "fixed" to local light speed, C by this simple Ho equation worked in the old algebra style of Maxwell:-


2 x oneMpc x C, divided by Pi to the power of 21 = 70.9449 k/s/Mpc



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMPC is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Pi is 3.142..........

Astronomers measuring Ho give the "ballpark" values of Ho, and now we have an Ho equation that "fixes" Ho to
local light speed, C, which has to be much more precise.

Note:- In the numerator, distance (Mpc) is multiplied by speed (k/s), and that is NOT an error in this situation, as the "distance squared" does not affect the numerical value of the Ho redshift by
"spreading out" (as any light source does) when viewing that redshift for Ho along just
one dimension only.

The dimensionless denominator Pi^21 sets the scales of this Ho equation correctly into the Dynamic Aether framework.
The Dynamic Aether Framework is not the static aether that the Michleson-Morley experiment could not detect, but
the Dynamic Aether that Faraday knew caused electrical "reluctance", and that Maxwell used as the basis for his
electric and magnetic "inertia" constants, and used in his Aether equations to calculate light speed. C.

=============================================================================================
Hubble Constant (Ho) Hubble Horizon Distance light years calculated from Ho of 70.9449 k/s/Mpc.



oneMpc X C, divided by Ho, and then divided by one billion = 13.7758 billion light Years



In this equation, directly input the values below:-

oneMpc is 3260000 light years

C (local) is 299792.458 k/s

Ho is 70.9449 k/s/Mpc

one billion is 1,000,000,000 used to give the answer in convenient units of
billions of light years.


Note:- This Hubble Horizon Distance equation prevents falsifying the terminology of
declaring light years as years only.

You CAN'T derive the Hubble constant. It is a *measured* property of the current expansion rate of the Universe.

 

[Yttrium]

First understand the equations, but if you can't just accept them as truth.

Why?

I could say "just accept that this dog is really a porcupine", and it doesn't get me any closer to figuring out whether God created the universe or not. You've multiplied some numbers together and ask us to accept that the units make sense somehow. People aren't disagreeing with you because they don't want God to be involved in creating the universe, they're disagreeing with you just because the units don't work. All that has nothing to do with God.

 

[David Hine7]

If I wanted to challenge you god, I would use the Bible. This is not the place for that. This is a place for discussing science topics.


You CAN'T derive the Hubble constant. It is a *measured* property of the current expansion rate of the Universe.

Say the expansion rate stays at 71 k/s/Mpc, which looks likely, what then?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Say the expansion rate stays at 71 k/s/Mpc, which looks likely, what then?

How exactly does any of that connect to your personal religious belief that God did it? I fail to see the connection.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Say the expansion rate stays at 71 k/s/Mpc, which looks likely, what then?

As explained in post #11, the "Hubble constant" is not actually constant. It changes with time as the Universe expands. Though none of us will live long enough for it to change.

The observed value will likely change as the measurements are refined. That is how science functions.

 

[David Hine7]

As explained in post #11, the "Hubble constant" is not actually constant. It changes with time as the Universe expands. Though none of us will live long enough for it to change.

The observed value will likely change as the measurements are refined. That is how science functions.

Ho has to stay around 71 k/s/Mpc as that is the fixed rate of the stretching of the skies (Isaiah Ch. 40)... Slight observed vairiations of Ho will be caused by changes in C, relative to the observer, due to local influences acting on C in distant space regions. This would cause the "Hubble tension" observed. It's not coincidence calculated Ho at 71 is the mean value of Ho. Keep measuring Ho and praising the Lord for His Creation.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ho has to stay around 71 k/s/Mpc as that is the fixed rate of the stretching of the skies (Isaiah Ch. 40)... Slight observed vairiations of Ho will be caused by changes in C, relative to the observer, due to local influences acting on C in distant space regions. This would cause the "Hubble tension" observed. It's not coincidence calculated Ho at 71 is the mean value of Ho. Keep measuring Ho and praising the Lord for His Creation.

Really? Biblical numerology?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

It's entirely one thing to say "I believe that God did it" and it's an entirely different thing to say "I can SHOW that God did it."

Honestly, the former is a lot more convincing and a lot more humble.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Ho has to stay around 71 k/s/Mpc as that is the fixed rate of the stretching of the skies (Isaiah Ch. 40)...

Isaiah 40 says nothing of the sort. Even if you make the incorrect reading of the "stretching" to be spacetime expansion, there is no number given.

Slight observed vairiations of Ho will be caused by changes in C

c doesn't change. It is a constant.

, relative to the observer,

c is the same for all observers.

due to local influences acting on C in distant space regions.

c is not different in different regions.

This would cause the "Hubble tension" observed.

No.

It's not coincidence calculated Ho at 71 is the mean value of Ho.

When you use numerology to hunt for numbers to mash together until it matches you can always dig up another number to smash in such that it matches. It might have at least been intriguing if this "math" had given 71 km/s/Mpc in 1990, but today it is utterly uninteresting.

Keep measuring Ho and praising the Lord for His Creation.

 

[David Hine7]

The two Hubble equations show you God did it. They are "spot on" in numerical value, and solve the Hubble issue. Ho is a very important Constant in cosmology, as C and Pi are. These are the keys to understanding some things about the universe.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The two Hubble equations show you God did it. They are "spot on" in numerical value, and solve the Hubble issue. Ho is a very important Constant in cosmology, as C and Pi are. These are the keys to understanding some things about the universe.

That really doesn't mean squat though. Just because you say they're 'spot on' numerically, does nothing to show that God did it. By that same token, you can call even the most basic maths of 1+1=2 means God did it.

 

[David Hine7]

You are quite right. 1+1=2. God also did that.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You are quite right. 1+1=2. God also did that.

Use the reply function, it exists for a reason. You've used it before, so you can keep using it for talking to other people. First thing.

Second thing: you're doing nothing to prove that to anyone but yourself that God did anything. You see God as doing everything, as you are right to do, but not everyone else is going to accept what you say. Let alone when your argument is something that people are soundly debunking