To me, the question has been settled by Hugh Ross and the folks at Reasons to Believe (reasons.org). They do a beautiful job of reconciling the creation stories in Genesis and Job and Psalms with the science that is being done in top notch universities today (which actually goes back to the attitude of many scientists of previous times who were trying to unfold the splendors and wonder of God's creation). Hugh Ross was himself a research professor at Cal Tech before he started Reasons to Believe back in the 80s. I just wish that I had been aware of Reasons to Believe long before I became aware of it, because the explanations are so elegant and have proven to be so accurate and we don't have to make up these stretches of imagination about how to force Genesis to mean something inaccurate. In fact, they have posited that using the Bible is the best guide for trying to understand the findings in various sciences (cosmology, anthropology, genetics, etc.) and have made a pretty good case for it. As another point of validation for the traditional scientific community (PhDs, etc.) it is interesting to note the the Nobel Prize winner Richard Smalley was so taken by the writings of Hugh Ross that he converted, and Hugh Ross spoke at the funeral of Dr. Smalley.