- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,605
- 52,510
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Accuracy doesn't guarantee agreement.You're just being teased. It seems to many of us that if the Bible really was the literal, inerrant and perspicuous product of omniscient plenary verbal inspiration as you all claim then you all ought to agree on what it says. That you don't is something to make fun of.
Is that why we have some eight different theories as to how we got our moon?You won't find the same level of disagreement over science that creationists have over creationism.
Is that why we have some eight different theories as to how we got our moon?
Such a minor point. And there really are not eight different theories. At different times there have been different hypotheses.Is that why we have some eight different theories as to how we got our moon?
You're just being teased. It seems to many of us that if the Bible really was the literal, inerrant and perspicuous product of omniscient plenary verbal inspiration as you all claim then you all ought to agree on what it says. That you don't is something to make fun of.
Made fun of Because two people have differences on this one thing?
The fact that creationists can't agree on something as fundamental as the nature of the universe speaks volumes about creationism.
Of course evolutionists sometimes disagree. But then, they don't assert that their positions are absolute truth, either.Made fun of Because two people have differences on this one thing? And as if evolutionists never disagree, Stop it, please lol. You all must really be falling behind to have to grab at something so petty. You are delighted....over nothing.
Defense against what?Might want to take my suggestion and spend your time making an actual case for evolution...you know, looking for an actual defense.
Creationism has been out of the water, high and dry, for something like two hundred years. But theory of evolution doesn't rule. It's just a scientific theory, subject to being overturned at any time by new evidence.Yeah man, what's happened here changes everything! Blows the whole concept of creation right out of the water, and evolution now rules.
Creationism has been out of the water, high and dry, for something like two hundred years. But theory of evolution doesn't rule. It's just a scientific theory, subject to being overturned at any time by new evidence.
Yeah man, what's happened here changes everything! Blows the whole concept of creation right out of the water, and evolution now rules.
Of course evolutionists sometimes disagree. But then, they don't assert that their positions are absolute truth, either.
Do you not think that something as fundamental of the nature of our own universe might be important? Or do you just not care?
I've heard peer review can get quite heated.Of course evolutionists sometimes disagree.
It doesn't "cause" anything. Disagreement among creationists just suggests that the book you claim clearly expresses absolute factual truth about creation maybe doesn't.I guess you just aren't going to pick up on the fact this virtually nothing of a disagreement, means...well, virtually nothing, and does not cause all those things you seem to think it does.
Defense against what?But milk it FWIW, your side of this needs all the defense it can make up..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?