xianghua
Well-Known Member
actually some ancient eyes were more complex (in some features) than modern eyes:
An eye-opening fossil
evolution doesnt predict that.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
actually some ancient eyes were more complex (in some features) than modern eyes:Ancient fossils with eye sockets with a hole for an optic nerve indicate that those eyes were pretty much like modern eyes. No evolution needed.
Evolution does not predict that increasing complexity is inevitable.actually some ancient eyes were more complex (in some features) than modern eyes:
An eye-opening fossil
evolution doesnt predict that.
That test doesn't apply to something that isn't falsifiable. An apple will still be an apple regardless of how many tests it is given.
Let's say we test the eye for falsifiability. In order to prove it is falsifiable we have to go back to it's evolutionary past and prove that it may have developed into a foot, or something else, instead.
As another pointed out all the parts of the eye must come together within the gestation period, fully functional, or no eye. Organisms don't build their working parts over time.
If you don't have a falsifiable test to determine when this complexity is present or not, any evidence you claim is meaningless.
so show me how the first light detector evolved. if its not realy a big step as you say it should be very easy to show that.
fine. so basically you have no problem to believe that a watch can evolve naturally (of course only if it has all the traits you have point to).
I'm an OEC.
To the OP. My testable evidence is anatomy; the irreducible complexity thereof.
Can you give an example imod an irreducibly complex biological system?To the OP. My testable evidence is anatomy; the irreducible complexity thereof.
OK. What characteristics of life indicate a guiding hand rather than indicating evolution guided only by feedback from the environment?
In a word, the sheer wonder of it all.
EVERY LIFE indicates THE CREATOR, ALL CREATION REVEALS HIS GLORY and POWER.In a word, the sheer wonder of it all.
EVERYTHING truthful that I know of , true science, true faith, true history, and so on,How is 'wonder' incompatible with natural evolution?
Say, don’t you think magical animal-cars are real? I keep asking and you never answerso if that watch had those traits you will say its just evolved?
They are for sale at disney land aren't they ?Say, don’t you think magical animal-cars are real? I keep asking and you never answer
EVERYTHING truthful that I know of , true science, true faith, true history, and so on,
is totally incompatible with so-called evolution.
Can you give an example imod an irreducibly complex biological system?
Irreducible complexity (IC) is the idea that certain biological systems cannot evolve by successive small modifications to pre-existing functional systems through natural selection.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?