Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If your study has proven evolution to be true why not present evolution as true. If brief articles written by experts are shot through with speculation what good does your study do? The truth is that evolution can't account for the complexity of life on earth. In fact it makes no attempt to do so.
The truth is that evolution can't account for the complexity of life on earth. In fact it makes no attempt to do so.
If your study has proven evolution to be true why not present evolution as true. If brief articles written by experts are shot through with speculation what good does your study do? The truth is that evolution can't account for the complexity of life on earth. In fact it makes no attempt to do so.
Evolution is true and is presented as such too.
Learn the basics.
Because that's how scientists communicate with each other.
Why don't they publish the odds implicit in their theories? Even weatherpersons do this in their forecasts.
Thats not how science works.
Most science is based on 100 percent accuracy, except the ToE. I (mostly) love what science has done for humanity, all except the ToE.
Most science is based on 100 percent accuracy
Most science is based on 100 percent accuracy, except the ToE. I (mostly) love what science has done for humanity, all except the ToE.
but genetic similarity can be evidence for a common designer too. so we cant realy use it as evidence for a common descent.
I've been asking how the specialized tissue evolves that makes it possible; down to the molecular level. So far....crickets.
I believe everything is a product of purposeful design, even when the design goes wrong and produces a monstrosity. If the wrong chemicals are mixed and blow up the mixture was 'designed' to do so.
Why don't they publish the odds implicit in their theories?
Most science is based on 100 percent accuracy, except the ToE. I (mostly) love what science has done for humanity, all except the ToE.
To what odds do you allude? How about giving us an example or two?Why don't they publish the odds implicit in their theories? Even weatherpersons do this in their forecasts.
Oh wow. That's some serious scientific illiteracy.Most science is based on 100 percent accuracy, except the ToE. I (mostly) love what science has done for humanity, all except the ToE.
I was asking for details.
Shot through with the usual suppositions and giant biological leaps. Nothing new here. Science says that nothing can be proven absolutely, but we are to believe the ToE as absolute fact. Or we are to believe the latest iteration...until a better one is devised. Curious.
This
How very convenient, Facts that change. Thats exactly my point, evolution science is not proven. Therefore it should only be taught as theory, and not paraded as fact.
Sorry but alot of your rebuttals have no actual back up and are just more provisional facts.
No slur intended my friend, just light hearted banter i thought.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?