• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How to answer the bible errors

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
First of all I'd like you all to know that I am a believer.

I have stumbled across some, what looks like bible errors, and here is my questions.

Do you think the bible has any errors at all? Any translations errors?

I will paste below somethings I found online.

If I were on an island with a non believer who questioned me about this, and let's say we had no greek/hebrew commentary...all we had was just God's Spirit to count on. Would you be able to answer these questions?

When I have asked people, they say "let me check with my pastor, or look it up" but for someone stuck on an island, wouldn't they have to just trust God for an answer? I want to see if any of you can answer without checking with a pastor or commentary...please, because we could all do that and since we know many pastors and teachers are divided, I don't really want to hear a ton of different versions from your pastor/teacher...just you relying on God's spirit...please!

__________________________________________________-

Bible Errors and Contradictions - P. Wesley Edwards
(updated 1-Sept-2004)
Bible debates, perhaps more than any other debate topic, can become lost in endless details of interpretation and subtle questions of translation. It can easily seem that to get into the debate at all requires one to be a Biblical scholar. Fortunately, this is not the case, particularly when dealing with fundamentalists who claim that the Bible is free of error and contradiction.
The claim of Biblical inerrancy puts the Christian in the position of not just claiming that the original Bible was free of error (and, remember, none of the original autograph manuscripts exist) but that their modern version of the Bible is the end result of an error-free history of copying and translation beginning with the originals. Such a position is so specific that it allows one to falsify it simply by reference to the Bible itself. For example, Gen 32:30 states, "...for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." However, John 1:18 states, "No man hath seen God at any time..." Both statements cannot be true. Either there is an error of fact, or an error of translation. In either case, there is an error. And if there is an error, then infallibility of the Bible (in this case the King James Version) is falsified. A typical defense used here is to look up the meaning of the original Hebrew / Greek, read that one of the words can have multiple meanings, and then pick the meaning that seems to break the contradiction. For example, the Christian might argue that "seen" or "face" means one thing in the first scripture, and something completely different in the second. The logical flaw in this approach is that it amounts to saying that the translator should have chosen to use a different word in one of the two scriptures in order to avoid the resulting logical contradiction that now appears in English—that is, the translator made an error. If no translation error occurred, then an error of fact exists in at least one of the two scriptures. Appeals to "context" are irrelevant in cases like this where simple declarative statements are involved such as "no one has seen God" and "I have seen God." Simply put, no "context" makes a contradiction or a false statement, like 2 = 3, true.

If one is prepared to allow for the possibility of translator or transcriber errors, then the claim of Biblical inerrancy is completely undermined since no originals exist to serve as a benchmark against which to identify the errors. Left only with our error-prone copies of the originals, the claim of infallibility becomes completely vacuous. Pandora's Box would truly be open: You could have the Bible say whatever you want it to say by simply claiming that words to the contrary are the result of copying or translation/interpretation errors, and nothing could prove you wrong.

Let's look at several more of these context-independent contradictions and errors of fact.1

Contradictions
2 Kings 8:26 says "Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign..." 2 Chronicles 22:2 says "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign..."
2 Samuel 6:23 says "Therefore Michal the daughter of Saul had no child unto the day of her death" 2 Samuel 21:8 says "But the king took...the five sons of Michal the daughter of Saul"
2 Samuel 8:3-4 says "David smote also Hadadezer...and took from him...seven hundred horsemen..." 1 Chronicles 18:3-4 says "David smote Hadarezer...and took from him...seven thousand horsemen..."
1 Kings 4:26 says "And Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses for his chariots..." 2 Chronicles 9:25 says "And Solomon had four thousand stalls for horses and chariots..."
2 Kings 25:8 says "And in the fifth month, on the seventh day of the month...Nebuzaradan...came...unto Jerusalem" Jeremiah 52:12 says "...in the fifth month, in the tenth day of the month...came Nebuzaradan...into Jerusalem"
1 Samuel 31:4-6 says "...Saul took a sword and fell upon it. And when his armourbearer saw that Saul was dead and...died with him. So Saul died..." 2 Samuel 21:12 says "...the Philistines had slain Saul in Gilboa."
Gen 2:17 says "But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day thou eastest thereof thou shalt surely die [note: it doesn't say 'spiritual' death] Gen 5:5 says "And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died."
Matt 1:16 says, "And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus..." Luke 3:23 says "And Jesus...the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli"
James 1:13 says "..for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man." Gen 22:1 says "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham..."
Gen 6:20 says "Of fowls after their kind and of cattle [etc.]...two of every sort shall come unto thee..." Gen 7:2,3 says "Of every clean beast thou shall take to thee by sevens...Of fowls also of the air by sevens..."
Luke23:46: "And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost." John 19:30 "When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost."
Gen 32:30 states "...for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." John 1:18 states, "No man hath seen God at any time..."
Factual Errors
1 Kings 7:23 "He made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about." Circumference = Pi() x Diameter, which means the line would have to have been over 31 cubits. In order for this to be rounding, it would have had to overstate the amount to ensure that the line did "compass it round about."
Lev 11:20-21: "All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you." Fowl do not go upon all four.
Lev 11:6: "And the hare, because he cheweth the cud..." Hare do not chew the cud.
Deut 14:7: " "...as the camel, and the hare, and the coney: for they chew the cud, but divide not the hoof." For the hare this is wrong on both counts: Hare don’t chew the cud and they do divide the "hoof."
Jonah 1:17 says, "...Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights" Matt 12:40 says "...Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly..." whales and fish are not related
Matt 13:31-32: " "the kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed which…is the least of all seeds, but when it is grown is the greatest among herbs and becometh a tree." There are 2 significant errors here: first, there are many smaller seeds, like the orchid seed; and second, mustard plants don't grow into trees.
Matt 4:8: " Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them." Unless the world is flat, altitude simply will not help you see all the kingdoms of the earth.
 
Last edited:

ashout

As Tall as Goliath and as fearsome too!
Oct 27, 2009
1,571
200
39
Home
✟17,556.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
the mistakes you have pointed out are all interesting, but do they really amount to anything? a little fudge in numbering, or an exageration that couldn't literally be true? the message of the bible is flawless and untill all things are revealed to us, we're probably going to have to take that for granted becuase it's worded in such a way as to cause much confusion, even amongst believers. the reason for that is another thing we'll probably have to wait for the answer for. maybe to humble us so that we lean on God and not his word.
 
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
First of all I'd like you all to know that I am a believer.

I have stumbled across some, what looks like bible errors, and here is my questions.

Do you think the bible has any errors at all? Any translations errors?

As much the Bible is the word of God, the revelation of God, it has not errors or mistakes. As much the bible have been copied and translated by humans it does contain errors. But those errors must be clearly explained as human errors. When an error is found it is necesary to explain how it happens. Anyhow is not a practice to correct it back to what we believe was the correct text.

The Bible is inerrant concernin internal probles like contradictions; and is inerrant concerning external problems like conflicts with fisics or history for example.

How do we deal with that? With faith. It is an exercise. Have faith in that an unexplained error has an explanation; until somebody telsyou that missing explanation.

Let me clarify somes I have already the answer. And give me few day for checking myself the others.
 
Upvote 0

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
As much the Bible is the word of God, the revelation of God, it has not errors or mistakes. As much the bible have been copied and translated by humans it does contain errors. But those errors must be clearly explained as human errors. When an error is found it is necesary to explain how it happens. Anyhow is not a practice to correct it back to what we believe was the correct text.

The Bible is inerrant concernin internal probles like contradictions; and is inerrant concerning external problems like conflicts with fisics or history for example.

How do we deal with that? With faith. It is an exercise. Have faith in that an unexplained error has an explanation; until somebody telsyou that missing explanation.

Let me clarify somes I have already the answer. And give me few day for checking myself the others.

Is it really God's word or is it God's story by man? The reason I ask is that I know God is perfect, but if I see any flaw, I begin to think it's not totally God's word, or else it would be error free and clear. This causes me to have to depend on God first and not a book with error. Does this make sense? I used to teach sunday school and after visiting so many churches, one of them cultish, I don't want so many "spirit filled" men to all disagree and give me all different interpretations. Has anyone ever been where I am at. The older I get, the more I see all I know is that God is love and i am nothing without him...but all of the things I thought I used to know...I am not so sure I am there right now.
 
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Matt 1:16 says, "And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus..." Luke 3:23 says "And Jesus...the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli"

Matt is giving the genealogy by joseph line; and Luk is giving the genealogy by Mary line. Notice that Matt is saying "begat" all along the entire genealogy. But didnt say that Joseph begat Jesus. Matt is recording biologycal father-son until Joseph. Luk is saying "son of". In hebrew tradition - and there is many biblical examples - "son of" can mean many thing. Can mean grand father, grand grand father, and also father in law. Heli could be the father in law of Joseph.
 
Upvote 0

ashout

As Tall as Goliath and as fearsome too!
Oct 27, 2009
1,571
200
39
Home
✟17,556.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
God didn't want us to depend on the bible more then we depend on him, but the bible is where we get our knowledge of him at this point. when he speaks to his prophets, often times he uses the bible to say what he's trying to say. it's going to last forever, which means that it is of God and not of man, becuase the things of man last a couple centurys or whatever at most. usually less then that, how long will plato last for? forever? no no no. He might live forever in heaven with Jesus, but his works will perish at the lastest, when this world does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Let me clarify somes I have already the answer. And give me few day for checking myself the others.

I so appreciate you even wanting to answer me...someone who has so many questions...bless you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
God didn't want us to depend on the bible more then we depend on him, but the bible is where we get our knowledge of him at this point. when he speaks to his prophets, often times he uses the bible to say what he's trying to say. it's going to last forever, which means that it is of God and not of man, becuase the things of man last a couple centurys or whatever at most. usually less then that, how long will plato last for? forever? no no no. He might live forever in heaven with Jesus, but his works will perish at the lastest, when this world does.

You guys are so sweet to take time for me...thank you so much!

So, is it safe to say that the bible is really not God's word...but a history book with a plan of salvation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

ashout

As Tall as Goliath and as fearsome too!
Oct 27, 2009
1,571
200
39
Home
✟17,556.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
You guys are so sweet to take time for me...thank you so much!

So, is it safe to say that the bible is really not God's word...but a history book with a plan of salvation?

well, no. absolutly not. The bible is certainly God's word. it's perfect, every verse fitting perfectly with the next. some of the verses even have multiple uses and meanings, it is used to kill people as well a save people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Is it really God's word or is it God's story by man? The reason I ask is that I know God is perfect, but if I see any flaw, I begin to think it's not totally God's word, or else it would be error free and clear. This causes me to have to depend on God first and not a book with error. Does this make sense? I used to teach sunday school and after visiting so many churches, one of them cultish, I don't want so many "spirit filled" men to all disagree and give me all different interpretations. Has anyone ever been where I am at. The older I get, the more I see all I know is that God is love and i am nothing without him...but all of the things I thought I used to know...I am not so sure I am there right now.

You are changing the direcvtion of your own treath. I can share with you more explanations for the aparently errors. But you have change the issue.

How can you depend on God alone? If you try to do so, you will be exposed to your own thots and feelings. saying "God toldme" is the most dangerous thing.

The so called errors and contradictions have explanation. Somes are just aparent erros like the one of the Jesus genealogy. You see that it was right all the time. Some are copy or translate problems. Any how, I strangly believe that those "errors" do not change the basic doctrine in the Bible.

Theology is a disciplene based on the Bible. It has some rules like every single doctrine must be supporte with several verses, never one alone. That makes practically immposible to enter a doctrinal mistake for an error of copy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
James 1:13 says "..for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man." Gen 22:1 says "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham..."

That is an English translation problem. James is "tempteh" as seduce somebody to sin. Genesis is "tempt" as tried out, proved, tested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Gen 6:20 says "Of fowls after their kind and of cattle [etc.]...two of every sort shall come unto thee..." Gen 7:2,3 says "Of every clean beast thou shall take to thee by sevens...Of fowls also of the air by sevens..."

Gen 6:20 is a short direction, and abreviated description og what Noa was supposed to do. Gen 7:2,3 is more detailed and specific
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Luke23:46: "And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost." John 19:30 "When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost."

Can you explainme what is the contradiction?
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

Goinheix

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2010
1,617
31
Montevideo Uruguay
✟2,018.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Gen 32:30 states "...for I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved." John 1:18 states, "No man hath seen God at any time..."
The disciples asked Jesus to show them the Father (that is God). Jesus replied that who have seen him (Jesus) have seen the Father (God). To see God face to face is a way of saying "very closely", ·"directly". God has not face that could be seen with eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
is this treath about to found explanation to the so called erros? or is about descouraging new christians? tomorrow i will continue for those sicere christians demanding answers.

It's so much easier to talk to people on a forum because you can ask questions you've always wanted to in church, but didn't have the courage to. So I am sincere with my questions.

I have a brother in law who I ran this site by. He is a believer.

I know God is perfect. Without God, we all have no hope. But I get confused with the bible.

We, my husband and I, have had so many different teachers, and our last christian friend told us he just calls the bible "the book" and I think it's because he feels in his heart to call it 'Gods word" is almost wrong because it can't be God's word or else everything would be perfect.

So I looked up bible errors and found that site I copied for you. There are things in there that are obvious errors. Does this mean God is not God? No, I don't believe so. I look around and see the evidence that our world is made by our Creator...but I am beginning to believe that since there are obvious errors in the bible, by man not God, that God must not want to change it or else he would? Does He want it that way so that we recognize the error and keep our eyes directly on Him? I don't know. Has anyone ever seeked God on this and God an answer directly from Him?

I don't mean to stumble any new christians and I am sure you are thinking my faith is weak...maybe it is in this area. I go to bed and pray that God will just become more and more alive to me in a way that I will know in my heart it is Him and not just saying "the Lord spoke to me".

I don't want to speak for God.

I hope I am not confusing you...I hope someone out there can understand what I am saying and can help me on how they got through this, and how we can answer those who would have the same questions.

Thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

joyusdays

Let's keep it real...with God's help!
Nov 12, 2006
372
18
✟23,150.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
the bible is actualy more perfect with all the flaws in it(if thats what they are). what effect do they have? they test our faith, they give evil people a reason to not believe.

Agree.

But my brother in law said he is going to ask his pastor about the number errors because it stumbles him to think the bible is not 100 percent perfect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

His_disciple3

Newbie
Nov 22, 2010
1,680
33
as close to Jesus as I can be
✟24,575.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I do believe that this OP is just another attack on the Authorized English Translation, KJB. And even if all these so called contradictions are explained you would not believe the explainations. But let me explain this before I attempt to answer some of these so called contradictions, when revelation says not to take away from the words, or if any man add unto these things. This is not saying that we can not take words away but rather we can not take away from the meaning of these words, and to add to these things, then we are not to add to the meaning of these things. the orginal 1611 for example the printing press letters were so small that I's and J's were often mixed up and U's and V's were also mixed Up. So if Iews was printed instead of Jews this did mean that God had not preserved His Holy Word. in translating some times word are added to clear up or taken away to better explain such as in America we say a toothbrush, in Mexico they say a brush of the teeth 1 compound or 4 words to explain the same object. May God bless all in their search for the Kingdom of God and His righteousness that all these things may be added unto you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0

His_disciple3

Newbie
Nov 22, 2010
1,680
33
as close to Jesus as I can be
✟24,575.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
2 Kings 8:26 says "Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign..." 2 Chronicles 22:2 says "Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign..."


there is no contradiction here in these two verses and we can see that there is none when we look at David, Samuel anointed David as King when David was just a lad, But it was much later when he actually took the throne, the same is with Ahaziah, he was anointed at 22 but didn't actually take the throne until he was 42. the reign part was as with a marriage, in these days when a couple was engaged to be married it was the same as if they were married so as with a king and his reign, if the king was dying His son maybe given the reign, but didn't actually enforce that reign until the father was dead. hope this has helped
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: psalms 91
Upvote 0