nobdysfool
The original! Accept no substitutes!
- Feb 23, 2003
- 15,018
- 1,006
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
We cannot have "rational, well-reasoned discussions"; and you know it. If you wish to believe it is my fault, that's ok with me.
It's not a matter of fault, Ben. It's a matter of owning up when you've been shown to be in error. You don't do so, and never have, that I have ever seen. As I've said before, no one is that good.
Ben said:Time after time it's been demonstrated that it's best for me not to reply, whatever I might say.
Yes, lest your errors be exposed, and you endure having to admit you're wrong. Unfortunately for you, your lack of response does not obliterate the fact that you have been shown to be wrong, repeatedly. Your response (or lack of same) does not affect what has been shown.
Ben said:So we'll agree to disagree, and you already know that I consider you my brother and friend.
Ben, I am serious when I say that if I ever get to Tulsa, I will buy you a steak dinner, and we will fellowship over that dinner. That is a completely separate thing from what we discuss here.
"Agreeing to disagree" is a principle of the Diaprax, which is a dangerous and insidious method of negotiation, in which the Truth is slowly but surely sacrificed on the altar of compromise and "can't we just all get along?" Getting along is not the end game of Theology, and Truth.
Upvote
0