• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Aaron112

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2022
5,845
1,440
TULSA
✟125,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
free to accept or deny the science.
Which science - there's at least two - the world/carnal /opposed to God / "false science" which is always in error from the start of anything,
or "creation science" (might go by other names sometimes) which can be wrong but at least is right sometimes.
So then, "free"? to accept or deny "false world's science" or "creation science" ?
 
Upvote 0

FaithT

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2019
4,722
2,226
65
Midwest
✟464,679.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For the RCC along with many mainline Protestant denominations the age of the earth is not a moral or faith issue. In other words their adherent are free to accept or deny the science.
Yes, but the official teaching of the LCMS is no evolution and a 6000 year old earth, and Idont like that.
 
Upvote 0

Aaron112

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2022
5,845
1,440
TULSA
✟125,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Yes, but the official teaching of the LCMS is no evolution and a 6000 year old earth, and Idont like that.
Do you choose* to "like"/ "believe" God's Word when God's Word is the Standard by which to live ?
* - positive and.hopeful affirmative expected.
 
Upvote 0

FaithT

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2019
4,722
2,226
65
Midwest
✟464,679.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do you choose* to "like"/ "believe" God's Word when God's Word is the Standard by which to live ?
* - positive and.hopeful affirmative expected.
I’m not sure I know what you’re asking
 
Reactions: dlamberth
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,033
4,895
✟362,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Thankyou very much, by your definition I have engaged in the world/carnal /opposed to God / "false science" variety of science.
Explain as a follower of the creation science type why are there so many different creation dates.

 
Reactions: Astrid
Upvote 0

Aaron112

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2022
5,845
1,440
TULSA
✟125,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Thankyou very much, by your definition I have engaged in the world/carnal /opposed to God / "false science" variety of science.
Explain as a follower of the creation science type why are there so many different creation dates.
As a follower of Jesus, believing Him and learning from the Father/ the Creator,
There is only one Creation Date for anything or anyone.
The Creator Created (or Creates) everything and everyone as He Says.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,033
4,895
✟362,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
As a follower of Jesus, believing Him and learning from the Father/ the Creator,
There is only one Creation Date for anything or anyone.
The Creator Created (or Creates) everything and everyone as He Says.
You haven't answered my question, I gave you a list of creation dates interpreted by individuals who have a literal interpretation of the Bible as you do and if the creation date is in the Bible why are there are so many different dates quoted?
 
Upvote 0

Aaron112

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2022
5,845
1,440
TULSA
✟125,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
This post are you referring to ?

I "literally" do not see anyone who agrees with me in this post of yours.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,033
4,895
✟362,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
This post are you referring to ?

I "literally" do not see anyone who agrees with me in this post of yours.
You have a problem with basic comprehension or just trolling?
Let me try again explain why there are so many interpretations of the creation date in the Bible when there should only be one answer.
 
Upvote 0

FaithT

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2019
4,722
2,226
65
Midwest
✟464,679.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As a follower of Jesus, believing Him and learning from the Father/ the Creator,
There is only one Creation Date for anything or anyone.
The Creator Created (or Creates) everything and everyone as He Says.
And what do you think I wrote in post#647 a recipe for tic-tacs?
Lol
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,182
3,189
Oregon
✟966,297.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
This post are you referring to ?

I "literally" do not see anyone who agrees with me in this post of yours.
I'm out here waiting to see what creation dates you do give. You seem to be walking around an answer.
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
6,033
4,895
✟362,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Let’s get back to the science.
Evidently as a follower of the world/carnal /opposed to God / "false science" type of science, I need to explain a common YEC argument regarding half-lives that one needs to hang around for the half life of an element in order verity it is correct.
Obviously for elements such as ²³⁸U which has a half-lie of around 4.5 billion years this is not terribly practical.

Let’s look at an analogy of a car travelling at a constant velocity of 100 km/hr.
In order to verify the speed on the speedometer, do we need to travel 100km to measure the time taken or alternatively travel for 1 hr and measure the distance covered?
Clearly the answer is no since the distance-time (s-t) relationship is a straight line with a constant gradient which is the velocity and we can arbitrarily select a distance or time interval of any magnitude to calculate the velocity v.




In the case radioactive decay there is a straight line relationship between the decay rate dN/dt and the amount of radioactive material present N.
The gradient of the line depends on the decay constant k in the equation






The half life t(1/2) is given by the equation;



Nₒ is the initial amount a t=0.
Since there is a straight line relationship using a half life is not compulsory where 50% of atoms have decayed, we could easily use any other time interval such as where only 1% of atoms have decayed in which case the equation becomes.



The other question thrown up by YECs is the decay rate k being different in the past, this not a scientific question but a question in hope that a 6000 year old earth is supported by a false dichotomy.
The scientific answer is k only changes when the parent atom has decayed into a daughter atom which also undergoes decay for example;

²³⁸U → ²³⁴Th → ²³⁴Pa

50% of uranium-238 decays into thorium-234 in 4.5 billions years but 50% of thorium-234 only takes 24 days to decay to protactinium-234m.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,366
52,698
Guam
✟5,175,115.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You have a problem with basic comprehension or just trolling?
Let me try again explain why there are so many interpretations of the creation date in the Bible when there should only be one answer.

The correct creation date is not a matter of interpretation.

It is a matter of calculation.

One that a simple abacus/calculator/slide rule can handle.
 
Reactions: Aaron112
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,366
52,698
Guam
✟5,175,115.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm out here waiting to see what creation dates you do give. You seem to be walking around an answer.

4004 BC

More specifically:

23 October 4004 BC
 
Reactions: Aaron112
Upvote 0

FaithT

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2019
4,722
2,226
65
Midwest
✟464,679.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No you did not .
Yes she did. Why are there so many?
Did the interim pastor you talked to believe in evolution?
 
Upvote 0