squint
Well-Known Member
Your statements are from your misdefinition and misapplication of the words of the text.
Uh, no, they are not. Your case COULD be made IF DEVILS were not with/within mankind. I don't think the case that they are NOT with/within mankind can be made in the light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. You have not weighed in on this matter of the devils existence or location after several specific question attempts.
And again, since we are primarily dealing with Matt 24 and the changeover of the covenant age; In Matt 24 the word used for generation is not referring to the Genos or Gennema of Vipers weather or not that genos continues through to today.
That is again your own imposed funnel. I stated to Doc a post or so up and will state to you, Matt. 24 talks about DECEPTION. Is the DEVIL NOT INVOLVED in deception? lol with denial of that working of devils...IN mankind.
I'm not at all saying that there are not a genos of people inspired by their jealousy of God and his creation....or self-will.... or being misled by lies or whatever... neither am I saying that there is a specific group of devils living inside men. (again, Mark Eastman and Chuck Missler hold those concepts)
Well, you would not be the first observer to overlook the facts of the other parties involved. That to me will remain a very blinded view NOT CONTAINING open facts and therefore a 'logical fallacy' by NOT containing very important potential components.
So again, you should if you wanted to be simply polite, come to terms with that side of the equation as to the devils existence WITH/WITHIN mankind. And you know as soon as you do or do not you WILL have to then either remedy HOW they may (or may not) be addressed in Matt. 24.
If you weigh in on the non-existent side, then you are rightfully posting in the unorthodox theology category.
Neither am I saying that their may not be a repeated principle of wrath poured out on babylonic counterfeit religions at a future time; or rather that perhaps 'wrath' is simply a confusion and unfruitfulness/disharmony of life in those individuals and association of groups who are not given the spirit of life and truth.
None of which have addressed the basic premise of THEM. You seem to be able however to postulate many angles BUT...them.
What I am saying (again) is that Matt 24 doesn't address that issue but rather talks about things that were to occur in the very lifespan (GENEA)of people to whom he was speaking and the evidence is that all those things including the end of the age (not World) and the end of the old covenant Jewish nation did occur to the very GENEA (lifespan)they were spoken to.
ONLY if you disconnect DECEPTION from DEVILS. Jesus preambles Matt. 24 via the workings of DECEPTION and delineates that working repeatedly in Matt. 24. The very fulcrum of Matt. 24 is the final elimination of THAT working. So it might again appear that the parties involved with 'deception' may play a rather significant role in understanding just who is going to find their ENDING...can you spell the DECEIVERS?
Your attempt to make Matt 24 apply to a future wrath on a generation (genos) of devils changes the very words of the greek text and to put it gently stands condemned for that very attempt.
I clipped a large part of your various speculations to see if you can answer the devil questions.
Also, I do not defer wrath of any sort at any time. We know that wrath was upon the earth in near continuity from the beginning in various ways. There is in Matt. 24 a FINAL WRATH, which that scripture set deals with all the way through Matt. 25 where the DEVIL and his messengers are AGAIN specified. The 'generation' of VIPERS was addressed also in the Matt. 23 forefront.
IF you insist that the VIPERS were only the Jewish Pharisees, then you will have to confront another problem with that view, as ALL OF ISRAEL were taught by God to be GODS CHILDREN in the O.T. (Deut. 14;1/Psalm 82:6) God did assuredly did NOT spawn VIPERS as HIS CHILDREN...or if so then you will have to make GOD the FATHER of VIPERS...and instant connection to GOD Himself which most sane theological observers will not find any sort of credible.
I think the point that your missing is that the old covenant was the conditional/national covenent given to national Israel.
Uh, NO...that is entirely not true whatsoever and easily DISproven...
Jesus openly stated that MAN (not just Israel) shall live BY EVERY WORD of God...not just the N.T. Words.
Paul himself stated that ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of God and useful for multiple applications. So the notion of O.T. Words of God ONLY being for 'national Israel' does not hold ANY water. It's a false construct.
And you are welcome to DODGE THE DEVIL questions all the live long day ...which practice I detest as disingenuous, dishonest and non-existing attempts in the exchange of information in these matters.
enjoy!
squint
Upvote
0