Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you want to know what an atheist is you ask an atheist. You do not go to a dictionary written largely by Christians. Would you go to a Muslim for a definition of what a Christian is?
How much longer do you think creationism will be tolerated in the US?
?? You're the one who claims that science says intelligence cannot be created. I was merely showing you scientific observations that seem to indicate otherwise. Can you show me, scientifically the origin of the intelligence that human beings possess, because it appears it developed during the evolution of our species.You will need to provide your sources for this intelligence theory you are inventing.
And an unchallenged theory is not a theory. It's just a whim.
And I'll bet you don't really know why that is.For that matter let's make a human just a different form of a pig. We do currently use pig heart transplants and pig skin in the medical field.
Nice. Accuse the entire scientific community of duplicity, bias and unfair tactics. One wonders where the golden rule applies. Apparently not here.Owned by Evolutionists, judged by Evolutionists, and if you dare insult or bring proof against their precious "Darwinian Evolution" dynasty there will be hell to pay and your funding will cease to exist.
I see. If an entire community of researchers gets one thing wrong, then your response is to never trust the results of any research they produce after that. I'm guessing that you don't go to doctors either, since the medical field has made mistakes many times in the past.Strawman tactics now?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
You all swore once they were extinct - they were wrong.
They told us it was fact they were a transitory species between land and water - they were wrong.
Yet now you insist because the majority tells us something else they are right - even if in every single case where they have done so they have been wrong.
Imagine that.
Even if evolution is completely false how does that make creationism true? creationism is a belief based on an old story as are all religions.
Yes, I have issues with someone who knows very little about the science of biology or the theory of evolution, but accuses all those scientists of lying and using unfair tactics to protect those lies. Do you believe that an uninformed accusation such as this is virtuous?You have issues
Yes, I have issues with someone who knows very little about the science of biology or the theory of evolution, but accuses all those scientists of lying and using unfair tactics to protect those lies. Do you believe that an uninformed accusation such as this is virtuous?
What is intelligence, but one's brain acclimating to the facts it absorbs??? You're the one who claims that science says intelligence cannot be created. I was merely showing you scientific observations that seem to indicate otherwise. Can you show me, scientifically the origin of the intelligence that human beings possess, because it appears it developed during the evolution of our species.
The one that says we're all Homos?You also need to work on your knowledge of the classification system used by science for the living things on this planet.
Yes...that one.The one that says we're all Homos?
Perhaps I shouldn't have matched her tone. Advice accepted.No its because your tone is so mad. You need to chill and eat a banana.
What does this have to do with the discussion at hand?What is intelligence, but one's brain acclimating to the facts it absorbs?
So much for the accuracy of evidence then.
Just curious, what led to the assumption that they went extinct?
Was it assumed on principle?
What part did the scientific method play in leading to that conclusion?
Really? Then why can't Christians honestly define atheism? And please, your analogy fails. If you wanted to be fair you would show that a dictionary written by a Christian could fairly define what Islam or Buddhism is. And since I am neither of those you would need to ask a member of Islam if the dictionary definition of their religion was correct or not.The religious have the capacity to be neutral and objective. It is not something exclusive to atheists. In fact, they have the capacity to be very biased as well.
Have you picked a dictionary lately whose definition of 'Christianity' is 'the one true religion of God'? Can't seem to find that one anywhere.
Is that why scientists think Hitler was a Christian?
With respect to your advice, or in spite of your advice?
Really? Then why can't Christians honestly define atheism? And please, your analogy fails. If you wanted to be fair you would show that a dictionary written by a Christian could fairly define what Islam or Buddhism is. And since I am neither of those you would need to ask a member of Islam if the dictionary definition of their religion was correct or not.
That is not the thought of scientists, that is the thought of people that have studied Hitler. He clearly was a Christian. He may have had faulty beliefs, though his actions are not all that different form other Christians that had absolute power in the past. And that fact has nothing to do with my suggestion. He may not have been your kind of "Christian" AV, but then your personal variety is rather unique.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?