• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How is God just?

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
Everything up to here is not relevant to my question. Sorry, that's just the nature of the question.

No. I'm not guilty of injustice, per se. I am presumably guilty of sin. Justice is a matter of balance, and actions having consequences. Injustice is not a synonym for sin. It doesn't matter what the nature of that sin is, who may be a victim if there is one, or what the outcome is the non-Christian will have to deal with the consequences, and somewhat harshly. The Christian will never have to with the consequences of their sin. The Judge ensures they will never face justice.
So how can we say God is just?

What follows is not relevant to my question.

You can redefine injustice however you choose to, that doesn't change the truth. God is the judge and creator of all things, he is the supreme Lord who defines justice objectively regardless of how his rebellious creations wish it was defined.

To God you have committed an injustice. We all have. And it must be paid for. Jesus' sacrifice allows our sins to be paid for, for us to be counted as justified in receiving salvation, removal of our guilt. We are made righteous. Instead of being damned for eternity we are given everlasting life. And the justice of God is satisfied. Through Jesus, God is no longer wronged by us. But if you do not have Jesus' sacrifice covering you, then your injustice to God has still not been dealt with. Your sins still stand before him.

Everything I said is relevant to your question, including the last statement I made. You want to call God unjust for giving us salvation, when in fact salvation through Christ Jesus is the only way for us to be justified to God. Christ wants you to come to him because that way you are no longer a sinner against the Lord. It is a way to reconcile the justice of God with His love for us. It is how God can be merciful and just at the same time. No sin is left unaccounted for. Justice will be restored through Jesus, or through judgement. It is absolutely relevant to this thread; whether you want to hear it or not is another matter.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Right but I am trying to get to the bottom of why he's asking this. He doesn't like the fact that Christians are washed clean from sin while non-believers still face damnation. A Christian could very well lose their way and commit murder, then come to their sense and return to Jesus, and they would be saved because Jesus paid for all of our sins, past, present and future.

Wait. You don't understand my question. It's not that I "don't like it". The claim is that God is just. Saying that punishment for sin should be eternity in hell, but this person will not be punished is contrary to that claim.

If the punishment for sin was hell but God worked it so nobody had to go, God would still not be just.

The difference between the Christian and non-Christian illustrates this.
 
Upvote 0

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
Wait. You don't understand my question. It's not that I "don't like it". The claim is that God is just. Saying that punishment for sin should be eternity in hell, but this person will not be punished is contrary to that claim.

If the punishment for sin was hell but God worked it so nobody had to go, God would still not be just.

The difference between the Christian and non-Christian illustrates this.

No, because God "worked it" so nobody had to go and also so that justice has been paid. He didn't just "let it go", only through Jesus' death was it possible. And even now only through faith in Christ, who paid the price, is it allowed.

To put it in simpler words, God worked it so nobody had to go, and also in a just way.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Obviously JGG is conflating the term 'justice' with 'fairness'.

No, I mean justice. We are told that sin is punished with hell and this is just. So if you're saying that Christians sin, but are not punished with hell then that is unjust.

But His ways are way beyond ours. Many think God must fit into their concept of what is fair and right or He simply cannot be.

Okay, then we shouldn't claim that God is "just". We have an understanding of what "just" means, and we do, if we use the word "just" to describe God, then we are saying that God fits our understanding of "just". Essentially, what you're telling me is that in the sentence "God is just" the word "just" is meaningless.

I could say that God is a "blueberry". I don't mean "blueberry" like we understand and use the term "blueberry" but in a different way we don't understand. Thus, God is a blueberry. What meaning does this sentence have if we don't know what blueberry means anymore? Saying God is a blueberry is now misleading.

Using a word that has a particular significance, or particular meaning to say something completely different completely inhibits understanding.

So. How is God just?
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
No, because God "worked it" so nobody had to go and also so that justice has been paid. He didn't just "let it go", only through Jesus' death was it possible. And even now only through faith in Christ, who paid the price, is it allowed.

No, no. Justice is not something that is paid. Justice is not a synonym for sin, or debt. Justice is upheld or not upheld. Others cannot serve justice on your account, that is the meaning of justice. Justice is that you are accountable for your actions not anyone else, and nobody can be held accountable for yours. If you find a way to sidestep or escape your accountability, justice is not done. You're saying Christians are not accountable for their actions, thus justice is not done.

To put it in simpler words, God worked it so nobody had to go, and also in a just way.

But how is it just? You can't just say "God did it and it's just" that is not an explanation. How is it that God is just?
 
Upvote 0

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
No, no. Justice is not something that is paid. Justice is not a synonym for sin, or debt. Justice is upheld or not upheld. Others cannot serve justice on your account, that is the meaning of justice. Justice is that you are accountable for your actions. If you find a way to sidestep justice, or escape your accountability, justice is not done. You're saying Christians are not accountable for their actions, thus justice is not done.

But how is it just? You can't just say "God did it and it's just" that is not an explanation. How is it that God is just?

Like I said, you can redefine justice however it suits you. Doesn't change what God says justice is, and that supersedes you. I already explained how salvation through Jesus justifies us to God. Itt's not "letting us off the hook" or however you want to spin it. It's a justified way of reconciling us back to God. If you don't accept that, coolio. The offer still stands as of today.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Like I said, you can redefine justice however it suits you. Doesn't change what God says justice is, and that supersedes you.

I'm sorry, I was told that God's definition of justice is one that we cannot understand. I didn't realize it was defined for us.

What is God's definition of justice?

I already explained how salvation through Jesus justifies us to God. Itt's not "letting us off the hook" or however you want to spin it. It's a justified way of reconciling us back to God. If you don't accept that, coolio. The offer still stands as of today.

I will wait on this until I know what the real definition of justice is.

In the meantime, if Christians understand justice to be something other than what the rest of us understand it to be, should Christians be able to serve as judges and lawyers?
 
Upvote 0

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
I'm sorry, I was told that God's definition of justice is one that we cannot understand. I didn't realize it was defined for us.

What is God's definition of justice?

I will wait on this until I know what the real definition of justice is.

In the meantime, if Christians understand justice to be something other than what the rest of us understand it to be, should Christians be able to serve as judges and lawyers?

God's justice says that Jesus' sinless death on the cross allows us to be washed of our sins when we faithe in Him. It is not a copout or lack of justice. It is justice paid by Christ, and allows forgiveness for us from God.

There's no reason to think Christians shouldn't be judges and lawyers. If anything a Christian who is governed by the Word of God is better equipped to be a judge or lawyer with integrity than a non-believer who doesn't have that guidance.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
God's justice says that Jesus' sinless death on the cross allows us to be washed of our sins when we faithe in Him. It is not a copout or lack of justice. It is justice paid by Christ, and allows forgiveness for us from God.

Several things:

Firstly, what is God's definition of justice?

Secondly, God doesn't get His own justice. If "God's justice" is different from ours then it is not justice in a way that we understand, and should be called something else.

Thirdly, you cannot just say "it is not a copout or a lack of justice" that's a bald assertion. How is it not a copout or lack of justice? Do Christians face the consequences of their actions or not?

There's no reason to think Christians shouldn't be judges and lawyers.

Sure there is. Based on the Christian model of justice you are describing to me, Christians cannot ever be convicted of a crime, and do not deserve to be prosecuted. How would a Christian judge rule when faced with a Christian and a Jew both charged with the same crime? How would a Christian prosecutor prosecute a person who does not deserve to go face punishment if he's guilty, and send someone to the electric chair for running a red light?

If anything a Christian who is governed by the Word of God is better equipped to be a judge or lawyer with integrity than a non-believer who doesn't have that guidance.

Really. In what other ways are Christians superior to non-Christians?
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,913
11,658
Space Mountain!
✟1,376,132.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No, no. Justice is not something that is paid. Justice is not a synonym for sin, or debt. Justice is upheld or not upheld. Others cannot serve justice on your account, that is the meaning of justice. Justice is that you are accountable for your actions not anyone else, and nobody can be held accountable for yours. If you find a way to sidestep or escape your accountability, justice is not done. You're saying Christians are not accountable for their actions, thus justice is not done.



But how is it just? You can't just say "God did it and it's just" that is not an explanation. How is it that God is just?

So, which source for philosophy of law are you referencing in the attempt to establish the meaning of 'justice'?
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
So, which source for philosophy of law are you referencing in the attempt to establish the meaning of 'justice'?

Just retributive justice. Justice should be consistent and actions have consequences. There's no point in going deeper than that.
 
Upvote 0

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
Several things:

Firstly, what is God's definition of justice?

Secondly, God doesn't get His own justice. If "God's justice" is different from ours then it is not justice in a way that we understand, and should be called something else.

Thirdly, you cannot just say "it is not a copout or a lack of justice" that's a bald assertion. How is it not a copout or lack of justice? Do Christians face the consequences of their actions or not?

Sure there is. Based on the Christian model of justice you are describing to me, Christians cannot ever be convicted of a crime, and do not deserve to be prosecuted. How would a Christian judge rule when faced with a Christian and a Jew both charged with the same crime? How would a Christian prosecutor prosecute a person who does not deserve to go face punishment if he's guilty?

Really. In what other ways are Christians superior to non-Christians?

God's justice is that the wages of sin is death, and all sin will be accounted for. It's not that God gets "his own" justice, it's that God defines justice objectively, and all of creation must face it regardless of how you would define it yourself. If you define it differently than God than you define it wrong. It's not a question of justice in a way "you understand", if you took the time to study God's Word you would understand it. It's not impossible, it just requires you to actually do some studying and contemplation.

I can absolutely say it is not a copout or lack of justice. God does not remain wronged by us through Jesus' sacrifice. Justice has been paid by Christ. The Law is fulfilled, not destroyed. Fulfilled means ended by completion. It was not side-stepped or otherwise left lacking. You can keep refusing to accept this, but it doesn't change anything.

Obviously the laws of the world are not in line with God's. That's just how it is, the world governments and courts are not going to follow the Bible, they will use the established law. But that doesn't mean God can't use his faithful ones to have compassion and just rule if they choose to faithe in Him.They would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes. They are trusting in Jesus. Unfortunately I don't know many judges or lawyers of that sort.

Christians are not superior to non-Christians. We are all the same. Christians just have salvation through faith in Jesus. It's Christ that gives us righteousness and holiness, not ourselves.
 
Upvote 0

lt11

Newbie
May 31, 2014
97
3
✟22,749.00
Faith
Christian
When we accept the sacrifice of Jesus and put our faith in him we are sealed with the Holy Spirit who resides in us. We become a new being the Holy Spirit aides in our transforming from the old sin nature to us conforming to be like Christ who is without sin. When Jesus returns we are no longer only transforming the process will be complete and we will no longer be attached to our sin nature we will be restored to how it was before the fall. Anyone is welcome to be Christian and it is anything but an easy path because true Christians must not conform to the pattern of sin that is in this world but be transformed to the image of Christ by Holy Spirit and the renewing of our minds. The reason that non believers will not be going to heaven is because they are not going to be transformed into the likeness of Christ ie sinless and restored because how can you be like the one you don't even acknowledge how can you conform into the image of the one the you can't see clearly. When all the Christians and God is removed from this world of course hell is going to be bad because God explains to us that he is love that he is light and if you remove him you are left without love and without light. And in the judgement God is only giving people what they chose. I don't don't think it injust to forgive those who accept Christ sacrifice who follow him and are therefore transformed into his image and are going to no longer sinful in the end when judgement occurs. The penalty is paid by Christ so that we can be new and therefore not the people who sinful by nature. There is no reason to punish a person once they are no longer doing what is against the Lord
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hakan101
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
God's justice is that the wages of sin is death, and all sin will be accounted for.

Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin.

It's not that God gets "his own" justice, it's that God defines justice objectively, and all of creation must face it regardless of how you would define it yourself.

It's not how I define it, it's how our society defines it. Our societal concept of justice is very different.

So justice, from the Christian point of view is that Christians (being special) should not be punished for any crime or sin in our society? That's Real Justice?

If you define it differently than God than you define it wrong.

It isn't a matter of defining it wrong. This is the method of justice we have developed, and the title we've given it. God may have meant for a cow to be named a "toaster" but we call them cows. When I say cow, you know I mean cow, and when I say toaster you know I mean toaster. When I say justice, we refer to what we call justice. God can have his own "justice" but we shouldn't call it that.

It's not a question of justice in a way "you understand", if you took the time to study God's Word you would understand it. It's not impossible, it just requires you to actually do some studying and contemplation.

Again. Do you agree with a justice system where Christians should never be punished for any crime they commit? Is that justice?

I can absolutely say it is not a copout or lack of justice. God does not remain wronged by us through Jesus' sacrifice. Justice has been paid by Christ. The Law is fulfilled, not destroyed. Fulfilled means ended by completion. It was not side-stepped or otherwise left lacking. You can keep refusing to accept this, but it doesn't change anything.

But why? How is God just in a way we can comprehend? You are merely asserting and making claims with no reasoning except "because I say so."

Obviously the laws of the world are not in line with God's. That's just how it is, the world governments and courts are not going to follow the Bible, they will use the established law.

Again, we agree in a perfect justice system, only non-Christians would be punished for crimes?

But that doesn't mean God can't use his faithful ones to have compassion and just rule if they choose to faithe in Him.They would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes.

Wait. I'll come back to this.

They are trusting in Jesus. Unfortunately I don't know many judges or lawyers of that sort.

Christians are not superior to non-Christians. We are all the same. Christians just have salvation through faith in Jesus. It's Christ that gives us righteousness and holiness, not ourselves.

But you just made a statement to Christian superiority:

"[Christians] would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes."

You're saying that non-Christians are more susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are selfish and power hungry? If non-Christians are evil, selfish and power hungry, and Christians are...better than them...isn't it safe to say that Christians take themselves as superior?

Did you not also say earlier that Christians are better equipped to be lawyers and judges because they have integrity? Does that not imply that non-Christians don't have integrity?

I understand now why you take God as just. The superior people are not accountable for their actions, the inferior ones are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

lt11

Newbie
May 31, 2014
97
3
✟22,749.00
Faith
Christian
JGG said:
Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin. It's not how I define it, it's how our society defines it. Our societal concept of justice is very different. So justice, from the Christian point of view is that Christians (being special) should not be punished for any crime or sin in our society? That's Real Justice? It isn't a matter of defining it wrong. This is the method of justice we have developed, and the title we've given it. God may have meant for a cow to be named a "toaster" but we call them cows. When I say cow, you know I mean cow, and when I say toaster you know I mean toaster. When I say justice, we refer to what we call justice. God can have his own "justice" but we shouldn't call it that. Again. Do you agree with a justice system where Christians should never be punished for any crime they commit? Is that justice? But why? How is God just in a way we can comprehend? You are merely asserting and making claims with no reasoning except "because I say so." Again, we agree in a perfect justice system, only non-Christians would be punished for crimes? Wait. I'll come back to this. But you just made a statement to Christian superiority: "[Christians] would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes." You're saying that non-Christians are more susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are selfish and power hungry? If non-Christians are evil, selfish and power hungry, and Christians are...better than them...isn't it safe to say that Christians take themselves as superior? Did you not also say earlier that Christians are better equipped to be lawyers and judges because they have integrity? Does that not imply that non-Christians don't have integrity? I understand now why you take God as just. The superior people are not accountable for their actions, the inferior ones are.
you are limiting God to justice only God actually refers to himself as love he also has no darkness in him at all he has compassion patience and should he for go those aspects of himself to only see justice for our sins done. The reason why Jesus pays the price is because there is no way that we can pay it sin eternally separates us from God. The Bible tells of how the world as we know it now will end and how we have been offered restoration. God is also power and majesty you can't define him alone in justice. We wouldn't even limit ourselves to just one of our traits
 
Upvote 0

lt11

Newbie
May 31, 2014
97
3
✟22,749.00
Faith
Christian
JGG said:
Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin. It's not how I define it, it's how our society defines it. Our societal concept of justice is very different. So justice, from the Christian point of view is that Christians (being special) should not be punished for any crime or sin in our society? That's Real Justice? It isn't a matter of defining it wrong. This is the method of justice we have developed, and the title we've given it. God may have meant for a cow to be named a "toaster" but we call them cows. When I say cow, you know I mean cow, and when I say toaster you know I mean toaster. When I say justice, we refer to what we call justice. God can have his own "justice" but we shouldn't call it that. Again. Do you agree with a justice system where Christians should never be punished for any crime they commit? Is that justice? But why? How is God just in a way we can comprehend? You are merely asserting and making claims with no reasoning except "because I say so." Again, we agree in a perfect justice system, only non-Christians would be punished for crimes? Wait. I'll come back to this. But you just made a statement to Christian superiority: "[Christians] would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes." You're saying that non-Christians are more susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are selfish and power hungry? If non-Christians are evil, selfish and power hungry, and Christians are...better than them...isn't it safe to say that Christians take themselves as superior? Did you not also say earlier that Christians are better equipped to be lawyers and judges because they have integrity? Does that not imply that non-Christians don't have integrity? I understand now why you take God as just. The superior people are not accountable for their actions, the inferior ones are.
God forgiving our sins doesn't mean that in this world there are no consequences for that sin. We are told as Christians to abide by our laws we are even told to pay our taxes. We are told to live on another we are told that we should pray for our enemies we are told to repay evil with good. What in essence God is ultimately getting done in the cross is restoration.
 
Upvote 0

Hospes

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
1,245
117
Arizona
Visit site
✟71,387.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin.
The bulk of this thread is due to you using a definition for just that is not the definition the Apostle Paul uses, and therefore, by extension, not the definition most Christians use. If I assume for the moment your definition for just, then you are correct in writing God is not just. Regardless, I choose to accept the definition for just from the same source that proclaims God to be just.

In essence, given your definition for the term "just", you are debating a premise most Christians do not assert as true. Assuming the Christian definition for the term "just", my guess is you wouldn't want to argue the point.

You see, the real disagreement is not regarding God being just, but is that Christians do not agree "Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin."

Not the best written; I hope this helps nonetheless.
 
Upvote 0

preacher4truth

Jesus saved me.
Nov 26, 2014
180
22
60
✟26,370.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The bulk of this thread is due to you using a definition for just that is not the definition the Apostle Paul uses, and therefore, by extension, not the definition most Christians use. If I assume for the moment your definition for just, then you are correct in writing God is not just. Regardless, I choose to accept the definition for just from the same source that proclaims God to be just.

In essence, given your definition for the term "just", you are debating a premise most Christians do not assert as true. Assuming the Christian definition for the term "just", my guess is you wouldn't want to argue the point.

You see, the real disagreement is not regarding God being just, but is that Christians do not agree "Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin."

Not the best written; I hope this helps nonetheless.

Good post. JGG is actually arguing what he believes to be fair or unfair, not justice.
 
Upvote 0

TheImmortalJellyfish

Unnaturally elected...
Oct 20, 2014
345
12
✟23,151.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Yes. Exactly. I will go back to the quote in the other thread: God does not act so much a judge as a Christian Membership Card scanner.

What would you have God do to murderous Christians? Revoke their "membership card"? Then what was the point in providing a Savior...?



Not all who confess and repent of their crimes are Christian. Think Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists.

What do Buddhists confess their sins to? Buddha? And I'd rather not start dragging other gods into this; since you brought up one in particular, let's stick with Him, or this thread will end up going down a deep rabbit-hole...



That does not make God just. That just means that God allows the Christian to escape justice, and nobody else. That is not just.

Maybe God just allows them to escape your justice...but no, never His.


I thought unrepented sin was grounds for eternal damnation.

I apologize if I've led you to believe that. But it is not, unless you don't believe. I mean, if you don't believe in something, how does it makes sense that you ask for its help? I'm not asking Santa Claus for anything this year either...;)

If you don't believe in it, eternal damnation should be of no concept to you, regardless of who tells you about it.



Forgiveness and mercy mean that one is not held accountable for their crime. How is that just?

So...you don't believe in forgiveness and mercy? I sincerely hope you don't have children, were that the case.
 
Upvote 0

Hakan101

Here I Am
Mar 11, 2010
1,113
74
Earth
✟1,715.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Engaged
Our concept of justice says that a person must account for their own sin.

No, your own personal belief on justice says that. JGG says a person must account for their own sin with no substitutions. God says that a perfect sacrifice may be killed to pay for one's sin, in place of themselves. He accepts that sacrifice as accounting for your sin. Society has varying views of justice, but they are not what's going to get us back to God.

It's not how I define it, it's how our society defines it. Our societal concept of justice is very different.

No, that's how you define it. Depending which society you're in over the world, justice can be dealt in different ways. Doesn't change the fact it is not God's justice. That's what matters when it comes to our sins against him. God lets the established governments rule with their laws, but when your life is over you're not going to face the US courts or whichever country you are from. You're going to face God himself.

So justice, from the Christian point of view is that Christians (being special) should not be punished for any crime or sin in our society? That's Real Justice?

You can keep spinning it however you want to. There is no condemnation in Jesus Christ. His death paid the price of sin once and for all. We are reconciled back to God and justified. God looks at us and sees us as innocent. The only way we are "special" compared to anyone else is that we chose to faithe in Christ as Lord.

It isn't a matter of defining it wrong. This is the method of justice we have developed, and the title we've given it. God may have meant for a cow to be named a "toaster" but we call them cows. When I say cow, you know I mean cow, and when I say toaster you know I mean toaster. When I say justice, we refer to what we call justice. God can have his own "justice" but we shouldn't call it that.

This is the second ignorant statement of the week. God does not give justice a different name, the terminology remains but the definition differs between man and God. Man may say an eye for an eye, but God allows a sacrifice to be made in place of the eye. That's justified whether you like it or not.

A sin is first and foremost against God, and God is the ultimate Judge. He said "Vengeance is mine. I will repay." But it sounds like you would rather take things into your own hands then rely on God to repay. That's your choice buddy. The ironic part is by trying to take retribution into your own hands you are going to find yourself at the end of God's retribution. And it won't be pretty.

Again. Do you agree with a justice system where Christians should never be punished for any crime they commit? Is that justice?

I agree with God's justice system where those who faithe in Jesus are not condemned to hell, but have salvation through Christ's blood. In this world, let the laws of the courts of this world judge them as they will. They can handle judgement in this life, God has the ultimate judgement in eternity.

But why? How is God just in a way we can comprehend? You are merely asserting and making claims with no reasoning except "because I say so."

If you are having trouble comprehending Jesus' sacrifice there is plenty of sources and information available on the internet, and in libraries. I already gave you my reasoning, if that's not enough for you then feel free to do some research, if the answer is that important to you.

Again, we agree in a perfect justice system, only non-Christians would be punished for crimes?

No. Justice on earth differs from justice for eternity. God has allowed us to establish laws for this world. We follow those laws. In eternity God has the final judgement of our fate.

Wait. I'll come back to this.
But you just made a statement to Christian superiority:

"[Christians] would not be as susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are not suiting their selfish or power-hungry purposes."

You're saying that non-Christians are more susceptible to corruption and evil, because they are selfish and power hungry? If non-Christians are evil, selfish and power hungry, and Christians are...better than them...isn't it safe to say that Christians take themselves as superior?

No. I am saying Christians who faithe in Jesus for guidance instead of relying on their own sinful nature are not as susceptible to selfish or power hungry purposes like a non-believer would be. Either one can still fall to temptation, but at least the Christian may seek guidance from the Lord. It is always better to seek guidance from God first instead of doing everything with your own power and knowledge. Therefore Christians are not "superior", rather we rely on Jesus for guidance and wisdom, and in our own power we are no different than anyone else. As Paul said, "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." You can too JGG. You have no less opportunities than Paul, it's just as available to you as it is to everyone else.

Did you not also say earlier that Christians are better equipped to be lawyers and judges because they have integrity? Does that not imply that non-Christians don't have integrity?

I understand now why you take God as just. The superior people are not accountable for their actions, the inferior ones are.

No. If you honestly believe I am saying non-Christians cannot have integrity then I question your reasoning abilities. More likely you are twisting my words. The implication is not that non-Christians don't have integrity. The implication is that non-Christians, by rejecting God's greater guidance and wisdom, are more likely to leave integrity behind to pursue selfish desires.

Another word-twisting. Again, if you want to call Christians "superior" because they choose to faithe in Jesus and follow him, thus receiving salvation and reconciliation to God, that's your choice. I wouldn't call it superior at all, because it's an opportunity available to everyone. Jesus died for all our sins. I would say we made the wiser choice while anyone who turned away from God made a foolish choice, especially when you spend your whole life knowing about Jesus and his sacrifice, yet refusing to repent.

Those who turn back to Christ and recognize Him as Lord and savior of all are not held accountable for their actions, because they are made righteous by Jesus, who paid the price for us. Those who rebel and hate Christ are held accountable, because they are evil and reject Christ's righteousness for their own. And what did God say about our righteousness? It's nothing but filthy rags.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0