Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
daneel said:Strong's Number: 726 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
aJrpavzw from a derivative of (138)
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Harpazo 1:472,80
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
har-pad'-zo Verb
Definition
to seize, carry off by force
to seize on, claim for one's self eagerly
to snatch out or away
King James Word Usage - Total: 13
catch up 4, take by force 3, catch away 2, pluck 2, catch 1, pull 1
As 'catch up' seems to be used the most, I'll take that as the definition.
'pluck' is a good one too.
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=726
<><
Mar 13:26 And then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
Mar 13:27 And then He shall send His angels and shall gather His elect from the four winds, from the end of the earth to the end of heaven.
EchoPneuma said:That's your perogative. Just know that it's not the true meaning of the greek word that Paul used. KJV translators in 1611 were all futurists. There WAS a bias there when they translated that word. IMO .
And now.....adieu...until the next debate
daneel said:Strong's Number: 3625 Browse Lexicon
Original Word Word Origin
oijkoumevnh feminine participle present passive of (3611) (as noun, by implication of (1093))
Transliterated Word TDNT Entry
Oikoumene 5:157,674
Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech
oy-kou-men'-ay Noun Feminine
Definition
the inhabited earth
the portion of the earth inhabited by the Greeks, in distinction from the lands of the barbarians
the Roman empire, all the subjects of the empire
the whole inhabited earth, the world
the inhabitants of the earth, men
the universe, the world
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/NewTestamentGreek/grk.cgi?number=3625
Mat 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be proclaimed in all the world as a witness to all nations. And then the end shall come.
Question: What does He mean by "the end shall come?"
Does the 'end of the earth to the end of heaven' refer also to the Roman empire?
daneel said:Of course they were futurists.....Jesus has'nt returned yet
<><
What are you referring to? A particular scripture?
And here I thought that you were ready for the debate to end .
And you really DON'T believe that Jesus is here with us? You think He's still up in heaven and isnt here with us now?
daneel said:Yes, Mar 13:26,27......it's clearly visible to you, to be seen with all eyes, coming in a cloud.....post #283bottom of page
nope. that was you.....
Depends on what you mean ....
But Jesus did tell the disciples the He would always be with them and never forsake them. But then, that was before 70 also.
But then, He was only talking to the disciples and not us, correct?
I mean what I asked. Do you really believe Jesus is still up in heaven and hasn't returned to be with us yet? I'm not talking about the Holy Spirit. I'm talking about Jesus Himself. Do you believe He is still in heaven and not here with us?
Hey, now you're getting it. Yes, He was talking to the disciples.
Now, all a person has to do to enter the Kingdom is turn to Jesus in faith and seek forgiveness.
By "in full bloom" I mean fully functioning. We haven't been delivered from it yet. It's still in effect in our bodies. But you are correct that it no longer has mastery over us. Jesus has broken the power of the old sin nature in us. Now we sin because we CHOOSE to , not because we are a slave to it.
daneel quotes:
I already did. It was in regards to the temple and offering of animals till 70 ad that is false.
What is false? Josephus said they were offered right up until the temple was destroyed. It's history.
If God wouldn't have accepted those sacrifices, that He had COMMANDED the Jews to offer, then God would have lied to them. Remember, the Jews knew that as long as the temple stood that they had the command from God to go there and offer sacrifices.
If the temple still stood, and yet God refused to accept those sacrifices it would make God a liar in the eyes of a Jew.
So that is why it was SO important for Jesus to destroy the earthly temple. That's why His prophecy in Luke 21 was so significant. Because when the temple was destroyed, God was showing them that the Old Covenant was GONE. That He no longer accepted those sacrifices because He destroyed the temple.
YOu have to look at this through Jewish eyes to see the significance.
I don't believe this, in any way, conflicts with the gospel message. Jesus death, burial and resurrection paid for sins (it is finished) and then God gave that generation of Jews a chance to repent and follow Him (40 years of grace) before He destroyed it all.............as the sign to apostate Israel that Jesus really WAS the sacrifice that ended all sacrifices.
daneel said:agreed
The Jews rejected Jesus of whom was foretold of in the Scriptures. It is not God who lied to them, it is they who rejected God.
No. We have to look through God's perspective to see the significance.
And a wicked generation saw many signs and wonders and still rejected Jesus.
The jews may have still offered sacrifices till its destruction, but it was a worthless endeavor.
Hidden Manna said:Hi EchoPneuma,
This is a good debate, your doing a good job even a child could undertsand it.
drstevej said:This is an excellent discussion. I appreciate the tone of the participants.
Thanks,
Steve
No, you have to look at this through the eyes of those Jews. This is all about the JEWISH Old Covenant coming to an end. That's what it is all about. That OT covenant was to JEWS. It was their light and life. It was all they had to help them relate to God. Yes, Jesus died to pay for sins and finished that work on the cross, but the Jews as a nation had no evidence that His claims were true because the temple still stood and the LAW said that they MUST go to the temple and offer sacrifices.
That's why Jesus said that not one JOT OR TITTLE WOULD PASS FROM THE LAW until ALL was fulfilled.
They had the law COMMANDING them to go to the TEMPLE IN JERUSALEM and offer sacrifices for their sins. So as long as that temple stood they were supposed to go there.
Luke 21:21-23 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. 22For this is the time of punishment IN FULFILLMENT OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN23How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against this people.
No, you have to look at it through the OT Jewish law that was still in effect until it was all fulfilled. The law was binding until it was ALL fulfilled. Jesus said it was ALL fulfilled when the temple and nation was destroyed during the time of punishment. That IS God's perspective according to Jesus.
Well, according to Hebrews, the offering of the OT sacrifices was ALWAYS a worthless endeavor. That God was never satisfied with them.....yet He REQUIRED them according to the law. Look: Hebrews 10 -
Siince 70AD, NOT ONE temple sacrifice has been offered by a Jew. WHY? Because all the OT law was fulfilled by the temple's destruction and the nation being exiled.
Jewish rabbis today will tell you that 70AD was the changing of Judaism from BIBLICAL Judaism to Rabbinic Judaism. They all admit that what they practice today is NOT biblical Judaism.....BECAUSE there is NO TEMPLE to offer sacrifices in.
A friend of mine who is a Jew said this very thing was what led him to Christ. He said that since the law commanded that they, as Jews, had to offer their sacrifices of atonement at the temple in Jerusalem, and yet God had allowed it to be destroyed and it had never been rebuilt, then God MUST have provided ANOTHER WAY for their sins to be forgiven. He wouldn't just leave them with no way to have their sins forgiven. And he began to search for that "other way"....and found Jesus the lamb of God.
That would have never happened if the temple would have remained in Jerusalem. He would have, like a good Jew, gone there and offered his sacrifices IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW and believed that they were forgiven. THe temple being destroyed was what showed him that the OT law couldn't be in effect any longer. That God had provided another way.
That is the significance of it to a Jew.
For a Gentile, like you and I (I assume you are) it's not that relevant. We simply accept that Jesus was the sacrifice for our sins. BUt then WE were never under the OT law of sacrifices LIKE A JEW WAS.
The bible says "salvation if of the Jews". So it all has to be looked at through those glasses.
daneel said:No. You need to look through the perspective of God.
1. Jesus fulfilled it.
2. Jesus said, "It is finished".
3. Jesus completed the Fathers will.
Yes, the LAW commanded them to go there. They also had the Scriptures that foretold of the Christ. They had the Christ in front of them and totally rejected Him.
The jews had obvious proof that the Messiah had come. It is with such hardness of heart they rejected Him.
Grace would now abound, and the Law was done away. The new covenant for Israel.
The Old covenant was done away.
You're going to need to differentiate between what Jesus fulfilled and what prophecy regarding the wrath of God is fulfilled. It does'nt add validity to temple worship and sacrifice there.
The difference between temple stuff and Grace is Jesus
Ok....can you show me where any of the disciples or Paul went to the temple to offer sacrifices? THey went to the temple to preach, yes.
Did Paul teach of the Law still in full effect? Or did he teach something else?
Still, the unblemished Lamb of God had pleased God.
There is some significance when Jesus asked, "Who do people say I am?" And it was Peter who said, "You are the Son of God."
You're forgetting that many Jews were converted by Jesus in His time. Many heard and followed.
But there are many who heard and did'nt follow.
Do you really think those that heard Him, saw Him, and rejected Him have validity in God's eyes for validity in temple stuff???
No, salvation is for 'whosoever'. We have a much larger perspective with which to see.
The Jews expected the Messiah. Their perspective was quite limited with Him standing in front of them. Their rejection of Him through hardness of heart gives no validity in God's eyes as to temple stuff.
Salvation is for all, both Jew and Gentile.
I AM looking at it throught the perspective of God. It was Jesus that said that not one jot or tittle of the law would pass away until ALL was fulfilled. Then He said that the time of punishment was to fulfill ALL that had been written. How can you interpret that any other way. What do you think the ALL was? He said "ALL THAT'S BEEN WRITTEN". Doesn't that mean the OT scriptures?
What you're not getting is that as long as the law was in effect for those UNBELIEVING Jews, they had the command of God to go and offer sacrifices. God had to show them that the LAW was GONE. They had no reason to believe Jesus was the true sacrifice of God if the temple still stood. Stop and look at this through Jewish eyes.
It is obvious proof to US....but not to a 1st century Jew. They had the LAW that commanded them to go to the TEMPLE. They weren't going to just abandon the law without some kind of proof that Jesus was really the sacrifice of God. Lots of Jewish zealots of that time died on Roman crosses. That didn't make Him special. Even Him rising from the dead didn't do it for them.....since the bible records that many OT saints rose from the dead when Jesus was on the cross. It took something MORE for those Jews to see. The Day of Pentecost opened alot of eyes...but still the nation as a whole rejected Him. BUt when Jesus destroyed the temple and nation in 70AD....THAT was God's final word to the JEWS that there was ANOTHER WAY to forgiveness besides the temple sacrifices. That was the FULFILLMENT of ALL THAT HAD BEEN WRITTEN.....therefore the law (old covenant) could now pass away
Can you show me where it says that the old covenant was done away with when Jesus died on the cross. In Hebrews (which was written AFTER the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Jesus) it says in chapter 8 in regards to the old covenant...
Notice Paul doesn't say it HAS disappeared, but that it will SOON disappear. He was talking about the Old Covenant. He says that God has made it obsolete and since it is obsolete it will SOON DISAPPEAR. So at that point it had not yet disappeared.....and this was written after Jesus had already ascended to heaven.
Can you show me where they did NOT offer any sacrifices when they went? Even Jesus was baptized to "fulfill all righteousness". That was according to the OT law. Why would He subject Himself to the OT law if He didn't expect His disciples to? Until the law "passed away" it was still in effect. It couldn't pass away until it was ALL fulfilled (according to Jesus)....and it was ALL fulfilled during the time of punishment (according to Jesus)....hence THAT is when it passed away....in 70AD at the fall of the temple.
He taught it was soon to pass away according to the verses in Hebrews I posted above. He said that Jesus nailed it to the cross. He said that faith actually uphold the law. He tells Christians that they are no longer under the supervision of the law....but NOWHERE does he say that the OT law had all been fulfilled or that it had passed away. As a matter of fact in Hebrews he says that it will "soon pass away". It did.....15 or so years later.
Much significance. Your point?
I'm not forgetting it. I know many heard and believed. But the nation as a whole had MANY prophecies that had to be fulfilled for Jesus to be proven as the true Messiah. ALL the OT had to be fulfilled or the law couldn't pass away.
And NO, I told you that God wasn't pleased or satisfied with the temple sacrifices EVER....but the LAW DEMANDED THEM. THe Jews HAD TO OBEY THE LAW until it passed away and was fulfilled. Jesus said that happened during the time of punishment.
You are wrong. The law demanded that they continue to offer the sacrifices. THey had prophecies concerning the time of the end and the time of wrath. THose had to be fulfilled before the law could pass away and the new covenant could come. You need to look at this from a Jewish point of view.
daneel said:Let's look at what Jesus said:
Mat 5:17 Do not think that I have come to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I have not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.
Notice He says 'from the Law'.
Not from 'All that is written'.
By yielding Himself fully to the Law, the moral intent of the Law, He fulfilled it.
The Scriptures still show of the Messiah, of whom they rejected. Yes, they had no reason to believe Jesus in THEIR eyes. Their eyes were blinded by the LIght. They chose the Temple, and did not choose Jesus.
We know that some Jews rejected and some received Jesus.
Again, is unbelief validation in God's eyes?
Many heard and refused. The disiples of Jesus heard and accepted.
To my understanding there are still Jews today who are waiting for the Messiah?
Yes, Jesus said, "It is finished".
12For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
Well, it's apparrent from the verse you cited. "The first one obsolete, and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear."
So, temple stuff is obsolete, and what lingers of it will soon disappear....
Nuff said?
Mat 5:18 For truly I say to you, Till the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled.
Again, fullfillment of Law. Not fulfillment of all prophecy.
the old is obsolete and the remnants pass away. But validity of the Law is obsolete, and Grace abounds.
Regards perspective and who's perspective has all authority.
This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".
This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".
This goes back to Jesus fulfilling the Law and not "All the OT".
I stated earlier that todays Jews are still awaiting the Messiah. Am I correct or all wet? I'm on unfamiliar ground here.
Maybe someone besides Echopneuma and myself can answer?
thanx
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?