- Jan 25, 2009
- 19,765
- 1,429
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
Been processing on what it takes for someone to truly be considered as a saint....and it seems some are considered more so than others, even though many believers do some of the same things and never get the title "saint." In example, as much as I may like St.Moses the Black or St.Anthony or St.Patrick...I greatly respect people such as George Washington Carver (famously called the "Peanut Doctor" and one responsible for revolutionizing the world with his creations), whom many consider to be an Eco-Monk/Eco-Missionary for the extensive amount of ways that he transformed communities/sought to show the love of Christ. He's similar. In many ways, a different version of St.Bartholomew the "Green Patriarch" ( #1 ,#6, #28 ) in the way he loved the Lord's creation and saw it as a means of saving others.
But of course, many would not consider him to be saintly enough...but he's someone I value. Interestingly enough, he based aspects of his work with plant hybridization on a monk known as Gregor Mendel (the "Scientist Monk" who did work on plant breeding while at St Thomas's Abbey of the Roman Catholic church). For more information on Gregor Mendel, one of the best books out there is known as The Monk in the GardeN: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. And for others:
All of that is said in regards to the larger issue of seeing how others are able to be considered as saints when while others aren't even though there may be the same actions in both. Praying that my question makes sense
But of course, many would not consider him to be saintly enough...but he's someone I value. Interestingly enough, he based aspects of his work with plant hybridization on a monk known as Gregor Mendel (the "Scientist Monk" who did work on plant breeding while at St Thomas's Abbey of the Roman Catholic church). For more information on Gregor Mendel, one of the best books out there is known as The Monk in the GardeN: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. And for others:
- "Famous Scientists Who Believed in God" ( )
- "Rocky Road: Gregor Mendel" ( )
- --"Mendel: Man and Mind - Mendel Museum of Genetics" ()
- The Christian DNA of Modern Genetics | Christian History" ( )
All of that is said in regards to the larger issue of seeing how others are able to be considered as saints when while others aren't even though there may be the same actions in both. Praying that my question makes sense
Last edited: