MrsFoundit
Well-Known Member
- Dec 5, 2019
- 899
- 200
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Apparently, B's free will is of no consequence.
The infringement on B is of enormous consequence. It just does not involve selective deprivation of free will, it is a false dichotomy to say if A is not outright prevented from acting then the imposition is of no consequence.
Upvote
0