Great. So is it OK to have an opinion on the formation that is the topic?God is the truth.
You had a link in your post I was quoting but I cannot post links yet. That link was of the WMAP sky map. I worked as part of the WMAP team.
So what your saying is Adam and Eve never accidentally stepped on an ant?
I know of one serpent in Genesis 3 that communicated with Eve; are you privy to more?Talking snakes,
I know of one serpent in Genesis 3 that communicated with Eve; are you privy to more?
Why scam?
So who mated with who?Serpents likely chat a bunch.
Who would mate with a chatty serpent unless one could respond?
Deep thought.
Sin, I guess.
Oh. The sky Chart. I read the follow up.
"It's not an actual map of the background radiation. You can't actually look at the chart and say 'This spot is cooler and this spot is warmer'. It's really just a chart of statistical variances. "
But that's not what the public was told. I followed the story every month.
So..what? You claim to know more than what the public were told? Care to tell us what? Or is is top secret!?It's a map of temperature fluctuations in the CMB. That is what the public were told.
It's a map of temperature fluctuations in the CMB. That is what the public were told.
But it's actually not. That's what the public was not told.
You may be referring to the map after Skylab was rebuilt
to actually read the data that was 10 times less than what the
sensors were designed to detect.
In other words, the BR was 10 fold smoother than all the theories.
The fictionists made up new fictions to accommodate the data.