• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

How did apes evolvle into humans?

Status
Not open for further replies.

A4C

Secrecy and Christ likeness cannot co-exist
Aug 9, 2004
3,270
25
✟3,626.00
Faith
Christian
Elduran said:
Well, I've finally decided that Carico and A4C are willfully ignorant enough for me to just block them and not miss out on any meaningful debate.

Congrats guys, you made my "ignoramus" list!

Actually it is a bit ironic but you put me on your "buddy" list apparently by mistake. As it happens I am not too sure what I would appreciate the most.:)
 
Upvote 0

A4C

Secrecy and Christ likeness cannot co-exist
Aug 9, 2004
3,270
25
✟3,626.00
Faith
Christian
category_Lattice%20Boom%20Crane%20Information%20Page.JPG
The foundations of that thing look a bit shaky.

Are you sure she won't topple?
 
Upvote 0

A4C

Secrecy and Christ likeness cannot co-exist
Aug 9, 2004
3,270
25
✟3,626.00
Faith
Christian
Heather S. said:
No. Actually it uses the word "we" because in ancient times, using a plural pronoun to refer to a single deity was a symbol of great power. The god of the Bible (especially of the Old Testament) was meant to be portrayed as huge and all-powerful. That is why the words "we" and "us" are used.

Well actually together with the plural pronoun is the description of God as Eloheim

There is no equivalent to this in English where it actually means more than one in a single being.
This is where we have the origin of the "trinity" -The Father (the creator) The Son (the Word of God) the Holy Spirit (the spirit of God)
Each of these was present within the one true God at creation -The Bible explains this to us.
It is that "triune" God the likeness of which we are made - ourselves being a three part being of spirit , soul, and body.
The fall of man certainly corrupted mankind but the good news is that through Jesus (a type of "second Adam) we are restored to the wholeness in which man was first created .
Amen
sermon over
anybody for tea and scones?
 
Upvote 0

Heather S.

Active Member
Jun 25, 2005
101
8
56
✟266.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Well actually together with the plural pronoun is the description of God as Eloheim
Yes and no. Elohim was typically used as a reference to many seperate deities. Christians pride themselves on being monotheistic, and describing the trinity as the Elohim, the author of the Bible would have been taking quite a bit of a stretch. After all, you wouldn't want to make anyone believe that Christians are polytheistic, right?
 
Upvote 0

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟35,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
A4C said:
Well actually together with the plural pronoun is the description of God as Eloheim

There is no equivalent to this in English where it actually means more than one in a single being.
This is where we have the origin of the "trinity" -The Father (the creator) The Son (the Word of God) the Holy Spirit (the spirit of God)
Each of these was present within the one true God at creation -The Bible explains this to us.
It is that "triune" God the likeness of which we are made - ourselves being a three part being of spirit , soul, and body.
The fall of man certainly corrupted mankind but the good news is that through Jesus (a type of "second Adam) we are restored to the wholeness in which man was first created .
Amen
sermon over
anybody for tea and scones?
I hate to burst your bubble, but the OT was written by people who don't believe in the trinity.
 
Upvote 0

A4C

Secrecy and Christ likeness cannot co-exist
Aug 9, 2004
3,270
25
✟3,626.00
Faith
Christian
Praxiteles said:
The OT was written by the Hebrews. The Trinity is a Christian concept.

Problem solved.
Problem not solved
Why did "hebrews" refer to God as Eloheim (plural)
Who did the "hebrews" believe YHWH was?
What was the spirit that annointed the "hebrew" prophets?

In fact the supporting "evidence " for the Christian belief in a "trinity " actually comes from the OT
 
Upvote 0
A4C said:
Problem not solved
Why did "hebrews" refer to God as Eloheim (plural)
Who did the "hebrews" believe YHWH was?
What was the spirit that annointed the "hebrew" prophets?

In fact the supporting "evidence " for the Christian belief in a "trinity " actually comes from the OT

Lots of words there.

The concept of the Trinity did not begin until the 1st century. The Hebrews and modern Jews did not and do not believe in the Trinity.

As to your question about their reference to Elohim (Gods): it seems clear that early Hebrews had a pantheon, but eventually trimmed their number of gods down to one.

Christians may indeed base their beliefs of the Trinity on the OT - but the fact remains that the writers of the OT had no concept of it.
 
Upvote 0

A4C

Secrecy and Christ likeness cannot co-exist
Aug 9, 2004
3,270
25
✟3,626.00
Faith
Christian
Praxiteles said:
Lots of words there.

The concept of the Trinity did not begin until the 1st century. The Hebrews and modern Jews did not and do not believe in the Trinity.

As to your question about their reference to Elohim (Gods): it seems clear that early Hebrews had a pantheon, but eventually trimmed their number of gods down to one.

Christians may indeed base their beliefs of the Trinity on the OT - but the fact remains that the writers of the OT had no concept of it.
A very shabby attempt at an in depth study of the Bible I must say
If you check you Hebrew you will find that Eloheim is not a plural word for god but a description of the one true God As I said there is no real equivalent in English - the closest being "Gods"
 
Upvote 0
A4C said:
A very shabby attempt at an in depth study of the Bible I must say

Thank you.

It's not my scholarship, though. I'm merely repeating what I've heard from those whose job it is to study it.

If you check you Hebrew you will find that Eloheim is not a plural word for god but a description of the one true God As I said there is no real equivalent in English - the closest being "Gods"

It's really not that hard. The statement was that the writers of the OT did not believe in the Trinity. Who were the writers of the OT? Jews. Do the Jews believe in the Trinity?
 
Upvote 0

L'Anatra

Contributor
Dec 29, 2002
678
27
41
Pensacola, FL
Visit site
✟969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A4C said:
Ask one if He believes in Eloheim.
Have you ever heard of an anachronism, A4C?

The word Elohim cannot be evidence for the Trinity because it appeared thousands of years before the Trinity was known.

Additionally, elohim is actually used to refer to other gods besides the God of Israel in the Old Testament (specifically, Exodus 20:3).

Have you read it?
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
nvxplorer said:
Isn't the Cambrian explosion when all the stuff exploded? You know, what was it called...the big explosion? The big burst? The big loud noise? I know I've heard of it before...


no, the cambrian explosion was the thing that killed the dinosaurs when the little itty bitty spinning speck went bang, and lots of rocks flew out and some hit the earth and burnt the trees. since there were no trees the monkeys started walking round on the soil and decided to give birth to humans who are better at living on the ground. all the elephants survived because they were on the other side at the time.
 
Upvote 0

corvus_corax

Naclist Hierophant and Prophet
Jan 19, 2005
5,588
333
Oregon
✟29,911.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
A4C said:
Problem not solved
Why did "hebrews" refer to God as Eloheim (plural)
From this site-
"However, without exception, whenever this word is used as God's name it is treated as singular. Thus, in the opening chapter of Genesis, where this name is employed exclusively, all the verbs associated with Elohim are conjugated in a singular form. When used to describe pagan gods, then Elohim is indeed used as a plural word meaning many gods."
A4C said:
Who did the "hebrews" believe YHWH was?
What a silly question
A4C said:
What was the spirit that annointed the "hebrew" prophets?
It was God's active force in the world, not some Christian trinitarian concept of God

A4C said:
In fact the supporting "evidence " for the Christian belief in a "trinity " actually comes from the OT
I can see that somebody hasnt spent much time on the NC forums on this site
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.