• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

How did apes evolvle into humans?

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jet Black

Guest
Grengor said:
Um, for the record, we didn't evolve from apes....

yes we did: humans by definition of ape, are apes. What I think you meant to say is that we didn'e evolve from any of the currently existing apes. an ape is a primate with no tail. and a primate is a mammal with an unusually large brain-body ratio (the other primates have this too, but not as much as us!) forward looking eyes, flexible fingers, a general dental pattern (as opposed to say canines which have very specialised dental patterns) have an unspecialised body plan, closed eye orbits and short fingernails.
 
Upvote 0

john crawford

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2003
3,754
9
84
usa
Visit site
✟3,968.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
QUOTE=Freodin:

"Of course there is a way of knowing what species or race of male animal in Africa mated with African Eve! The only species that is biologically capable of mating with her: her own!"

So you admit and confess to the biased neo-Darwinist evolutionist theory that Homo neanderthalenis, erectus and ergaster men were incapable of impregnating African Eve, just as Lubenow and I suspected. What evidence do you have of African Eve's sexual partners, or are you just imagining her mythological existance as neo-Darwinist theorists of human evolution out of Africa want you to?

"I guess that you are trying again to appeal to our emotions again, and evoke the picture of poor little Eve (pictured in our minds like on the renaissance works-of-art) being continuously raped by hairy, filthy apes."

I have no such imaginative pictures in my mind. What makes you think that African Eve got raped at all?
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
john crawford said:
How do you know this to be categorically or scientifically true? What evidence exists to prove that African Eve didn't mate with some member(s) of a Homo erectus or ergaster tribe? How do we know that she didn't have multiple partners and that those different sexual partners don't account for the evidential racial diversity in the human race nowadays?

well it is ok, because those species are human too, just not "modern human" which relates to the difference in erectus, ergaster and sapiens. Namely our much larger cranial capacity and other differences in facial positioning and dentition, brow prominence and so on. However Erectus only appears to have survived up to about 400,000 years ago, and Mt Eve is from 150,000 years ago. There is certainly no evidence of erectus or ergaster being around at this time.

Your point about multiple partners is irrelevant. While Mt Eve is the sole ancestor of all current mitochondria (well that have been studied), many of her other genes will have no current ancestors, and all the genes that we have will come from common ancestors older or younger than her. She is merely the individual ancestor that we can date for a particular genetic piece, due to the fact that mitochondria do not mix like other genes. you arguments about Mt Eve indicate that you do not really understand what the analysis of mitochondria is saying about her, and this could be leading to many of your misconceptions regarding racism.
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
55
Visit site
✟29,869.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
john crawford said:
How do you know this to be categorically or scientifically true? What evidence exists to prove that African Eve didn't mate with some member(s) of a Homo erectus or ergaster tribe? How do we know that she didn't have multiple partners and that those different sexual partners don't account for the evidential racial diversity in the human race nowadays?

Because to say so would show a complete misunderstanding of what African Eve is and a denial of the evidence that racial diversity came about after the species left Africa.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟260,281.00
Faith
Atheist
john crawford said:
How do you know this to be categorically or scientifically true? What evidence exists to prove that African Eve didn't mate with some member(s) of a Homo erectus or ergaster tribe? How do we know that she didn't have multiple partners and that those different sexual partners don't account for the evidential racial diversity in the human race nowadays?

A compelling piece of evidence that "African Eve" did not have sex with any Homo Ergaster or Erectus is that there seem to be some hundredthousand years between them.

Quite the same evidence exists that JFK - who had tons of unknown liasons - did not have sex with Cleopatra...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deamiter
Upvote 0

Deamiter

I just follow Christ.
Nov 10, 2003
5,226
347
Visit site
✟32,525.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
*** Mod Hat On ***
Could we try to stay away from the racism claims here? It's no good derailing perfectly legitimate topics like this. Evolutionary theories have never been racist. Current evolutionary (and indeed, any biological) theories do not even distinguish between "races" in humans today! The term race is meaningless in biology and human evolution. Yes, social darwinism was racist. However this thread is about how humans evolved from apes. Lets try to stay on topic shall we?
*** Mod Hat Off ***
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.