No, he taught the word and he was a product of that.Paul was a man of his time in history and a product of his culture.
A prophet, as Paul was calling himself, is one who has received revelation of the mystery concerning Christ and the church Ephesians 3:5 which revelation is the foundation for the building of the church Ephesians 2:20No, he taught the word and he was a product of that.
1 Corinthians 14:37 If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord.
Is this scripture true or false?A prophet, as Paul was calling himself, is one who has received revelation of the mystery concerning Christ and the church Ephesians 3:5 which revelation is the foundation for the building of the church Ephesians 2:20
It stands to reason to question deeply whether it is being built on rock or sand.
Not if all prophets die in Jerusalem as he set out to do. But, spiritually speaking, I would say yes. But in a Balaam sorta way imo. I don’t approve of the method of throwing women under the bus to prove a point.Is this scripture true or false?
1 Corinthians 14:37 If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord.
You agree then that the things Paul writes are the commands of the Lord Himself?Not if all prophets die in Jerusalem as he set out to do. But, spiritually speaking, I would say yes. But in a Balaam sorta way imo. I don’t approve of the method of throwing women under the bus to prove a point.
Based on his description of a prophet that I gave you the scripture for. But why nitpick when he also said some things are his own interpretation of what that revelation meant.You agree then that the things Paul writes are the commands of the Lord Himself?
It’s moot ... God demands the topic but people are set in their own minds. So frankly my position is clear, but it’s questioning like this that is aimed at muddying the waters again. More smokescreen. What I really want to say is go pester someone else. Just because someone sticks to their guns in not dissecting the NT then some gunslinger comes along and say ‘but I insist’ Have a god-blessed day and do your own homework. It seems the census has God not only dead but the church in it’s death throws so good luck. I don’t have the patience to babysit you. Report me if you like but it doesn’t change facts.Forgive me but you cant support your assertion then. Correct?
No worries i wont report you.It’s moot ... God demands the topic but people are set in their own minds. So frankly my position is clear, but it’s questioning like this that is aimed at muddying the waters again. More smokescreen. What I really want to say is go pester someone else. Just because someone sticks to their guns in not dissecting the NT then some gunslinger comes along and say ‘but I insist’ Have a god-blessed day and do your own homework. It seems the census has God not only dead but the church in it’s death throws so good luck. I don’t have the patience to babysit you. Report me if you like but it doesn’t change facts.
Nor give any attention to what was said or ask an intelligent question that takes any thought based on what was said. Or so it seems.No worries i wont report you.
Don’t we all give our own approval to what is right? Based on Christ as the foundation try redrawing the lines from what He(Paul) said to what He(Christ) meant by the revelation of Christ and the church. But I write that for others benefit not yours. It’s not trivia.Your opinion is noted but not proven.
You have shown zero scripture to support your assertion. Why then should i believe you over Paul?Don’t we all give our own approval to what is right? Based on Christ as the foundation try redrawing the lines from what He(Paul) said to what He(Christ) meant by the revelation of Christ and the church. But I write that for others benefit not yours. It’s not trivia.
For the same reason that you would believe Jesus as to the new birth and as you believe Paul to be spiritually minded and not of the law. Nuff said. But I am willing to bet that you read the bible as Paul being highlighted to Him. Why would I know that? Because it was a habit I had to break myself of.You have shown zero scripture to support your assertion. Why then should i believe you over Paul?
It’s not allowed on this forum for the direction you are taking it, that much is certain.I should bow out, im unsure if debate is allowed. Thank you for your time.
It's clear from context that this refers to his instructions on behavior of prophets.Is this scripture true or false?
1 Corinthians 14:37 If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord.
I think that if Paul were to visit our churches today, he would welcome Women's leadership and ministry in the church. He would say, "I know what I thought and said in the First Century, but I now see how that women are educated, resourceful, have their own role in the body of Christ, and the Holy Spirit is fully supporting what they are doing. I still don't believe they should usurp the authority of their church leadership, but then again, I don't think men should either."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?