...
False, like I have demonstrated in another thread:
Actually, mutations is adequate in meeting this demand. There are many kinds of mutations: Deletion, Duplication, Inversion, Insertion and Translocation.
Picture source: Wikipedia
One causes a loss in formation, two are neutral and two cause a gain. All are observed. In fact, Translocation can also cause a gain in information:
Wrong again. For this segment of this post, I would like you to keep very well in mind this table as I go through the processes by which DNA mutations gain totally new information. Each of the boxes in this table represents an amino acid. The left of the box represents the codon series of three rybonucleic bases on the transfer RNA (tRNA) which instructs rybosomes how to produce a chain of polypeptide (protein). AUG produces Met, or Methionine, which signals the start of ALL protein chains, while UAA, UAG, UGA signals the rybosome to cease coding.
Now, let's say we have a line of code that goes AUG-CAU-GAU-CGA-AAG-UCA-UAG. This codes into Met-His-Asp-Arg-Lys-Ser-Stop. Below are diagrams demonstrating each of the types of mutations shown in the diagram in the above segment of the post can produce "totally" new information:
The mechanisms for BOTH increasing the VOLUME of information AND creating of NEW information for new amino acids being coded in new places have been demonstrated. So where, then, is this "magic barrier" to prevent macroevolution from occuring?