Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because we're apes, not monkeys. Primates split into monkeys and apes, and we emerged from the latter category. Thus, we are humans, we are apes, and we are primates, but we're not monkeys.
Well, that depends on what we call a 'horse'. The modern organisms today we call horses, and our benchmark for colloquial taxonomy is what exists today. Each ancestor of a given horse is less horse-like than the last, to the point where it doesn't have any of the defining features. Nomenclature is a testament to human language, not a detriment to evolution: we call doves and pigeons by different names because they look superficially different, yet they're essentially the same animal."Horse-ish"?
If evolution is still an ongoing process then this horse-ish transition is still ongoing and what we call a horse is really still a horse-ish.
As science can be defined as what we know to be true (or at least as yet not proven to be not true) by rational, logical, intelligent thinking based on evidence, it is unlikely that your statement is correct.
In France they call steer "acier". Therefore, by your AV Logic, the whole of material science and construction is fundamentally flawed. They have a different name for it, gosh darn it!
-- Must be a private joke.
Why don't you plod through almost 2.3 million posts and find out for yourself?
Stop whingeing and just answer the question. You habitually avoid and ignore questions, give evasive answers and change the topic, and then you have the gall to whinge about someone else's question being unanswered. Answer it yourself. Go on, have a go.
Has it yet been proven that all that scientists claim to know is actually true?
If scientists are so rational, logical and intelligent in their thinking when they analyze evidence, then they should never be wrong. Yet, they often are. Why is that? How can a rational, logical, intelligent thinking being ever be wrong?
Since scientists consider themselves animals then your point is meaningless.
God didn't create animals in His image as scientists believe they are, so your point is, again, meaningless.
Do you mean remove our mind as in not focusing our mind on the junk promoted by scientism? We already did that.
It encourages us to stop thinking like scientismists and recognize there is more to reality than the scientific.
The dismal standards of thinking demonstrated by scientismists here is not interesting at all.
