How can u believe it?

[Tomatoman]

Doveman:

Has it yet been proven that all that scientists claim to know is actually true?

Read again what I wrote.

If scientists are so rational, logical and intelligent in their thinking when they analyze evidence, then they should never be wrong. Yet, they often are. Why is that? How can a rational, logical, intelligent thinking being ever be wrong?

Read again what I wrote.

Since scientists consider themselves animals then your point is meaningless.

Maybe I should have written "from other animals". The point remains the same.

God didn't create animals in His image as scientists believe they are, so your point is, again, meaningless.

This is gibberish.

Do you mean remove our mind as in not focusing our mind on the junk promoted by scientism? We already did that.

No. I mean exactly what I wrote. Your reply is proving my point.

It encourages us to stop thinking like scientismists and recognize there is more to reality than the scientific.

You're actually trying to prove my point now. Can I quote this sentence in future to demonstrate an example of what I mean?

The dismal standards of thinking demonstrated by scientismists here is not interesting at all.

Doctor, the lobotomy was successful.

 

[Hespera]

Has it yet been proven that all that scientists claim to know is actually true?

the only time scientist talk about facts is something like 'its a fact that this is the data i got". talking about "truth" is for philosophers.


If scientists are so rational, logical and intelligent in their thinking when they analyze evidence, then they should never be wrong. Yet, they often are. Why is that? How can a rational, logical, intelligent thinking being ever be wrong?

ever wonder why you are so wrong?

Since scientists consider themselves animals then your point is meaningless.
God didn't create animals in His image as scientists believe they are, so your point is, again, meaningless.

Scientists think "god" created animals in his own image? WHAT are ya smokin' pal? Do you ever wonder why you need to tell whoppers to present your "ideas"?



Do you mean remove our mind as in not focusing our mind on the junk promoted by scientism? We already did that.
It encourages us to stop thinking like scientismists


Scientismists. funny. Its also funny that you'd imply you could "stop" thinking like a scientist, when you never knew how in the first place.


and recognize there is more to reality than the scientific.

cool you propose to go above and beyond when you dont even have the basics.

The dismal standards of thinking demonstrated by scientismists

Even a scientismist, if should a thing were to exist, could hardly do worse than the gibberish coming from the theocreologists, who routinely make up things in order to have something to criticize. (the bit about scientists thinking god made animals in his own image is a rather recent example)



here is not interesting at all.

Theocreology is kind of intersting in an anthroplogy sort of way. i like to now and then send choice snippets back to China, where they think the falun gong is kinda nutty. They realize they have not seen nothing till they hear about flood water going to Neptune to ward off rogue angels; i will add to that that them scientists think god made animals in his own image.

Should I clean up the grammar in this a bit before i send it?.

"God didn't create animals in His image as scientists believe they are"

 

[Split Rock]

Has it yet been proven that all that scientists claim to know is actually true?

Of course not.

If scientists are so rational, logical and intelligent in their thinking when they analyze evidence, then they should never be wrong. Yet, they often are. Why is that? How can a rational, logical, intelligent thinking being ever be wrong?

Are creationists ever wrong? You told me that your interpretation of scripture is not infallible. If so, then how can some one be wrong when they are being guided by the Holy Spirit?

To answer your question, most of the time it is due to a lack of information, ie data.

Since scientists consider themselves animals then your point is meaningless.

He meant "other animals." Good catch, though

God didn't create animals in His image as scientists believe they are, so your point is, again, meaningless.

According to you guys, man's intellect is a special gift that separates man from beasts (that and a soul). So, the question is, why is it bad to use this gift?

Do you mean remove our mind as in not focusing our mind on the junk promoted by scientism? We already did that.

No, I think he meant youa re ignoring reality, to prop up a mistaken view of scripture. Really, does God want you to ignore reality?

It encourages us to stop thinking like scientismists and recognize there is more to reality than the scientific.

What is a "scientismist?"

The dismal standards of thinking demonstrated by scientismists here is not interesting at all.

Again, what is a "scientismist?" I don't know anyone here who claims to be a "scientismist."