• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

How can it be called orthodox if it is not biblical?

Lucis

Lost soul
Apr 26, 2009
563
62
haruðóz
✟15,967.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Wouldn't "church tradition" be a better way to describe this denomination? The bible never mention anything about praying to dead people or angels :angel: or the mother of Jesus. Instead it says that it is just one name that people can be saved by. And I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems like in this denomination people are very interested in empty rituals :liturgy:, long beards :priest:, fancy clothes, long ritualized prayers :crosseo:, incense, icons etc. and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us. :holy:

So how can this denomination that seen to got so much unbiblical be called things like "the ancient way", when the bible tells nothing about the tings that is common in it? Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more :preach:, and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.
 

AureateDawn

Love & Peace
May 2, 2006
3,774
145
34
Knoxville, TN
✟27,273.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us. :holy:

You haven't heard a heated, fiery, passionate sermon from my priest! ;)

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.

Well, you certainly come across as if your intention is to be offensive and/or provocative.

But I think this is a valid question! :) I, however, am poor at explaining things. Someone will pop by in here and do the job much better than I could! :p

Welcome to TAW! ^_^ :hug:
 
Upvote 0

NHB_MMA

Veteran
Apr 9, 2006
1,389
52
✟24,314.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
A more fundamental answer to your question that addresses the base level is that Christianity was practiced for decades before the canon was ever finalized. For that matter, Christianity was obviously practiced before the New Testament was even anywhere near completed. Therefore, why would a mere absence of mention in Scripture make something errant by default? There are many aspects of Christianity that have little Scriptural mention, but are pillars of the faith, such as the Trinity.
 
Upvote 0

Lucis

Lost soul
Apr 26, 2009
563
62
haruðóz
✟15,967.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
The Bible says nothing about some doctrines that Protestants believe in too, such as the Age of Accountability, for example.
mark 10:14 But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.

For that matter phrases like "personal relationship with Jesus Christ" are not found in Scripture either.

john 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

jer 4:22 For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge.

rom 8:9 But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His.

"Ask Jesus to come into your heart" isn't there either.
rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

See? I can explain my faith. So I would be glad if anyone here would do the same with the things I questioned in my first point. :) Just verses from the bible that explain the things that is part of the denomination, would be nice. Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

choirfiend

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2005
6,598
527
Pennsylvania
✟77,441.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sure! Everything that Orthodox do and believe is supported in SOME way in Scripture, as well, of course, in historical record as what the early Christians believed, taught, and did. I genuinely hope that we can answer some of your questions---but please, remember that in order for us to do so, you MAY have to keep an open mind---and realize that you have a TON of biases and presuppositions that you have been instilled with. You may be viewing things through glasses you don't even realize you are wearing. Even, in the end, if you think that another belief is right, we can certainly tell you some about the Church and explain our beliefs---all of which point to, glorify, and stem from the Person of Jesus Christ.

The most important thing: After all, in order to understand why we have ANY teaching or practice, you must first know what we believe about CHRIST. And our beliefs about CHRIST are what make us different from any Christian denomination.


As opposed to simply presenting ALL of the teachings here, I'd like to offer you a few links that explain things fairly well, and may help give you some kind of "basis" or grounding in the Orthodox view of creation, the Fall, the Incarnation, the Resurrection, and the relationship between God and Man in all of this. Which, of course, is the summation of Christianity. With a greater understanding in mind (which in my opinion, is best helped by visiting an Orthodox church for more than one service and getting some answers and help from a real live priest) you can ask more informed and specific questions, which will allow us to answer you better. Sound good?

This series of short books has topics broken up into indexes.
OCA - The Orthodox Faith


I like this book for a 'back to basics" on Orthodox foundational teachings that differ from denominations teachings. Divine Energy: The Orthodox Path to Christian Victory

This website has a large selection of articles on various topics. A few of them are certainly more pertinent to your questions than others---so, if you can give one specific question at a time, we can address it without lots of asides and distractions.
Our Faith Articles — Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kreikkalainen
Upvote 0
M

Mikeb85

Guest
Wouldn't "church tradition" be a better way to describe this denomination? The bible never mention anything about praying to dead people or angels :angel: or the mother of Jesus.

Denying the Saints' intercessions and the fact they're still alive by the grace of God is to deny God's power to transform people from sinners to saints....

Instead it says that it is just one name that people can be saved by. And I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems like in this denomination people are very interested in empty rituals :liturgy:,
If you took a close look at those rituals you'd realize they all serve a purpose, and are all biblical

long beards :priest:, fancy clothes, long ritualized prayers :crosseo:, incense, icons etc. and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us. :holy:

Beards and 'fancy clothes' were part of ancient Judaic practice and have much symbolism attached to them, incense is again a practice mentioned in Revelation (and a continuation of Jewish practice), and no, we don't forget any words of the Bible. Icons were also part of ancient Jewish tradition - it's only in more modern rabbinical Judaism that they've been mostly eliminated , not to mention theologically speaking they are less offensive than the pictures found in Protestant Bibles and books.

So how can this denomination that seen to got so much unbiblical be called things like "the ancient way", when the bible tells nothing about the tings that is common in it? Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more :preach:, and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.

The Orthodox Church is the earliest Church in existence, any historian who has excavated ancient Churches in the Holy Land will tell you the same thing. Furthermore, the collection of books in the Bible itself wasn't even canonized until well after the formation of the Church and the first Ecumenical Council...
 
Upvote 0

maybenotcrazy

Okay okay...
Sep 25, 2008
538
28
nowhere
✟23,328.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Scripture as we know it today isn't in "scripture" The bible was compiled by people long after the bible was written which orthodox christians like to think was a little bit more tradition based than protestantism would like to admit. The trinity is not in the bible. Hmmm what else is tradition? By the way praying to saints has been done since the 3rd century AT LEAST. And Jews did it before christ. Not to mention the crazy experiences I had that confirmed to me that praying to saints is valid... Which I will not disclose here. But trust me, as a non credible person I nevertheless have been shown that the ORTHODOX CHURCH IS IT. But hey, you don't need that to know it all the evidence lies in our church's history. Just read and learn...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

maybenotcrazy

Okay okay...
Sep 25, 2008
538
28
nowhere
✟23,328.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Wouldn't "church tradition" be a better way to describe this denomination? The bible never mention anything about praying to dead people or angels :angel: or the mother of Jesus. Instead it says that it is just one name that people can be saved by. And I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems like in this denomination people are very interested in empty rituals :liturgy:, long beards :priest:, fancy clothes, long ritualized prayers :crosseo:, incense, icons etc. and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us. :holy:

So how can this denomination that seen to got so much unbiblical be called things like "the ancient way", when the bible tells nothing about the tings that is common in it? Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more :preach:, and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.

By the way, who is martin luther that we orthodox christians should be listening to him? Is he god on earth? The man? Trust me one man's work is not ground for destruction of an ancient "tradition" or should I say CHRISTIANITY ITSELF.


Nice link that shows that far be it from what I thought martin luther actually thought that orthodoxy was pretty orthodox, but not "orthodox" enough for him.

http://www.stpaulsirvine.org/html/lutheran.htm
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Julina

Veteran
Apr 14, 2008
2,415
163
37
New Joisey
Visit site
✟25,785.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Wouldn't "church tradition" be a better way to describe this denomination? The bible never mention anything about praying to dead people or angels :angel: or the mother of Jesus. Instead it says that it is just one name that people can be saved by. And I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems like in this denomination people are very interested in empty rituals :liturgy:, long beards :priest:, fancy clothes, long ritualized prayers :crosseo:, incense, icons etc. and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us. :holy:

So how can this denomination that seen to got so much unbiblical be called things like "the ancient way", when the bible tells nothing about the tings that is common in it? Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more :preach:, and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.
to put it simply, the Church was around before the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Joshua G.

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2009
3,288
419
U.S.A.
✟5,328.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Wouldn't "church tradition" be a better way to describe this denomination? The bible never mention anything about praying to dead people or angels :angel: or the mother of Jesus.
We don't pray to dead people. IN fact, we ask for the prayers of people who are much more alive than you or I
Instead it says that it is just one name that people can be saved by.
Christ.... where have you read differently?

And I don't want to offend anyone, but it seems like in this denomination people are very interested in empty rituals :liturgy:,
Where did you get the idea we are interested in or even practice empty rituals? Please show us.

long beards :priest:,
It was good enough for Jesus.... lol But seriously, my priest has a short beard that changes a lot, I don't have a beard and another priest I know has a super long beard. Should I be suspect of him because he wants a beard? Seems a bit closed minded, it woudl seem. Monks tend to have long beards and so do many priests in various countries but these are outwards symbols. No one believes that a person is made holy by a beard. Since when is it wrong to find Symbols helpful? Do you not have a picture of a cross in your room or on your chest?

fancy clothes,
Like a tux? lol But really, when I hear that, I always think of the woman who put expensive perfume on Jesus feet and then Judas said that could ahve been sold and the money given to the poor. There is a time when we give our best (materially) that we have to God not because he can use it but because it reminds us that all we have here on Earth is His. There is a time to where cut-off jeans and ratty t-shirts (like when building Orphanages in Tijuana) and a time to use our most ornate. The Liturgy is where we offer our most expensive perfume to Christ. But surely you don't beleive the Sunday Service is the only time Christ is present, right? WIth that said, it is fair to say that we Orthodox are interested in all sorts of apropraite atire for God's sake. "Fancy clothing" when worshipping Him as a community on the day of His resurrection, jeans and a tshirt when helping the less fortunate, khakies and a tie when going to the job he gave us, toutous and spandex when dancing in a ballet or a football uniform according to the gifts He has given us. It depends. God is present at all times and our attire does matter because it allows us to do what we are called to at that moment and focuses us on the job at hand.

long ritualized prayers :crosseo:,
we are interested in all kinds of prayers. Short ones in times of distress or great need, repetative ones to keep our minds focussed on him when working on menial tasks, offering good deeds to God, when we say a simple "thanks" to HIm when something goes well and yes, long ritualized prayers. Those prayers help us not stray on our beliefs. If we pass the same prayers down from generation to generation, we learn how to pray from the masters. I won't go too deeply into this, but to say that when we pray those set prayers every day on our own or every week at Church, we have a blue print to go back to. This is why we don't mess with the Lord's Prayer, the greatest prayer of all of them. That is our blueprint. As an Orthodox, there are time when I pray spontaneously to God, but my spontaneous prayers have matured over the years due to learning from those long ritualized prayers. Im not referring to fancy language or the Thees and Thous, but how to pray... and how NOT to pray.
incense, icons etc.
incense is completely biblical and while not necessary, who said anything about getting rid of everything that isn't necessary. When we use incense we are using one of our five senses that God gave us. In fact, we use all five senses in worship. Seeing the icons, touching the icons, hearning the hymns, tasting the Blood and Body of Christ and smelling the insense. Worship is for the entire human being, NOT just his mind. We are careful not to overintellectualize the faith but rather to ingrain into every aspect of our being. Faith is spiritual, mental and physical (which is why at certain times we bow so low that we touch our noses to the ground becuase we are human not just spiritual like the angels, human... like Christ).
and seem to be forgetting the words in the bible that the Kingdom of God is within us.
What do you base that we have forgotten that on?

So how can this denomination that seen to got so much unbiblical be called things like "the ancient way",
We may have things that aren't explicitly from the Bible, but by unbiblical I think you actually mean anti-biblical... if that's so, where are these anti-biblical practices?
when the bible tells nothing about the tings that is common in it? Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more
The ones that ignore the words of Christ when He says "This is My Body, this is My Blood?"

and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.
Have you come here to learn or just preach to us?

Not writing this to offend anyone, just curious about things that seem strange to me. :) God bless.
You may not be writing to OFFEND, however you are not writing just because you curious because curious means you want to learn. Let's be honest here, seriously, you are writing because you wish preach to us.... in our home. If you can at least admit that, an honest dialogue can progress, but posting under the guise of "I am curious" while simultaneously imposing your uninformed notions based almost purely on your emotions is not an effective way to start an honest dialogue....

Joshua
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

buzuxi02

Veteran
May 14, 2006
8,608
2,514
New York
✟219,964.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The bible is precisely just that: Tradition- and not the totality of it. The bible is not greater than the Church which bore it.

Following "only" the bible is proof that ones denomination was created years after the bible was written. For how can the church be "bible only" whhen it was born of the Holy Spirit on pentecost in 33 A.D., yet the NT was written of a span from 50 a.d. to 100 a.d.? Was there no church before the gospel of John was written in 95 a.d.? If so, to which 'established' community was John writing to then?

Churches relying on the "bible only" (a belief rejected by that same bible) is proof that they are not the ancient church of the NT. It is proof that such an organization was organized centuries later, and needing instruction found it in hindsdight searching through the past, to find something to grasp onto, that is the bible.

Such an organization could not even have existed before 380 a.d., since no NT canon had yet existed. It is also proof that such an organization allowed the Orthodox Church to choose its canon, since before this period many writings existed which were considered divinely inspired by some and fraudulent by others, such as the gospel of the Egyptians or pseudo-Clement. Also certain texts which are found in the NT canon were not considered NT at all in 100 a.d. or 200 a.d. for that matter. Such was the book of Revelation and the book of Hebrews.

Thats why we are the "ancient way" because we precede the NT, and deciphered which are the divinely inspired books. First by our Father Cyril of Jerusalem in 350 a.d. who first compiled the exact NT that we have today minus the book of Revelation. Then this NT list of St Cyril's was approved at the church council of Laodicea in 363 a.d. and along with certain latin councils of the late 4th century have passed down to you the bible in its present form. Anotherwords the bible used by the "bible only" believers is the bible WE TOLD YOU TO USE. It is the authority for some denominations because WE TOLD THEM IT WAS AUTHORATATIVE. And these "bible only denominations" humbled themselves and obediently accepted the memoirs of the apostles as we deemed them.

And all those things you mentioned not being in the bible, certainly are in the bible, such as the earthly saints praying to the heavenly saints (Rev 5.8) and to angels (Rev 8.3, Zech 1.12-13) for intercessions.
And the bible does indeed mention incense. In fact the bible prophecies that the gentiles will one day offer incense to the True God (Mal 1.11). Who are these gentiles? Obviously they are the christians of the Orthodox church.
And yes icons are permitted as well, the first icon being Jesus Christ himself, Who being God and invisible, took on the form of matter and became visible. Thus the incarnation of the Lord made flesh appeared in a bodily form and thus could be depicted. As Christ said to his disciple, "He who has seen me has seen the Father". He is the visible image of the invisible God. And other images and relics were allowed (Heb 9.2-5, Acts 19.12)
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,317
20,989
Earth
✟1,656,643.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
for starters, welcome to TAW!

I was in your shoes around four years ago when I was confronted with the Orthodox Church for the first time. I think something to keep in mind is that the Bible, while the books were written in the 1st century, they were not compiled until the end of the 4th century. so the Church preceded the canonized New Testament.

if you read Christian history, you will see that the Bible was put together by the Church to reflect her beliefs. it was put together for the community of believers, to reflect her beliefs and for her use. everything that you stated that is unbiblical, we actually can find in the Scriptures. don't take my word for it, but start researching Christian history and see what the early Christians had to say about what you are bringing up.

hope this helps
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
42,317
20,989
Earth
✟1,656,643.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Surely the true ancient way would be more like some of the non-denominational churches of today that only rely on the bible and nothing more :preach:, and that those churches would be the true orthodox churches.

actually this is also interesting. the Bible tells us to maintain the tradition whether by word or epistle. so there will be an oral as well as a written tradition. to the true ancient church would have a non-written aspect to it, and this Church would not only rely on the Bible.

something else to think about is that is Christ died in 33AD, and the earliest scripture was written in around 50AD, then what did the Christians use for 17 years? that's nearly a generation's worth of time with no New Testament. so there must be something other than the Scriptures only that Christians should look to.

hope this helps
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joshua G.
Upvote 0

Lucis

Lost soul
Apr 26, 2009
563
62
haruðóz
✟15,967.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Thanks for several interesting answers, specially Buzuxi02 that took the time to explain by scripture some of the things I questioned in my opening post. I could however not see anything in the verses you gave that suggested that Christians should use icons or pray to saints and angels. Remember the golden calf that the Israelis made. The bible also warn about summoning the dead. The angels themselves warned the prophets that tried to worship them and clearly told them not to do that. So I'm very skeptical about this and really hope it is not idolatry with the icons, and hope that the prayers to saints and angels is not something that takes the focus of where it should be (Jesus). I have never seen anything that suggest that this is something Christians should do. And that is basically why I'm questioning it, to see how it is justified. In my opinion it would be better to avoid something that Christians isn't clearly told to do by God. But that's just me.

I really am interested in the "ancient way", in the original Christianity, in the gospel as pure as it can get, and how the first Christians was living. And I haven't really thought of the idea that the bible came after the Christians before, but it is true. Is there any texts that are being used by the orthodox church that is not part of the standard bible? I do got the apocrypha's, but are there more of them?
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,205
21,429
Flatland
✟1,080,840.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
And I haven't really thought of the idea that the bible came after the Christians before, but it is true.

Obviously, what you read in the New Testament is Paul writing letters to churches, right? What were these early Christians (who we all admire so much) doing - having coffee hours until Paul's letters arrived? ;) No, they were worshipping the risen Christ in the ancient way.
 
Upvote 0

Julina

Veteran
Apr 14, 2008
2,415
163
37
New Joisey
Visit site
✟25,785.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Thanks for several interesting answers, specially Buzuxi02 that took the time to explain by scripture some of the things I questioned in my opening post. I could however not see anything in the verses you gave that suggested that Christians should use icons or pray to saints and angels. Remember the golden calf that the Israelis made. The bible also warn about summoning the dead. The angels themselves warned the prophets that tried to worship them and clearly told them not to do that. So I'm very skeptical about this and really hope it is not idolatry with the icons, and hope that the prayers to saints and angels is not something that takes the focus of where it should be (Jesus). I have never seen anything that suggest that this is something Christians should do. And that is basically why I'm questioning it, to see how it is justified. In my opinion it would be better to avoid something that Christians isn't clearly told to do by God. But that's just me.

I really am interested in the "ancient way", in the original Christianity, in the gospel as pure as it can get, and how the first Christians was living. And I haven't really thought of the idea that the bible came after the Christians before, but it is true. Is there any texts that are being used by the orthodox church that is not part of the standard bible? I do got the apocrypha's, but are there more of them?
the earliest churches had icons in them. in fact, according to tradition, the first icon ever was written by St. Luke the Evangelist, of the virgin Mary and Jesus.

and we do not summon the dead. summoning the dead is what mediums do at a seance, which is obviously not what we're about. we are just asking the saints and angels to pray for us, we are not praying to them.

we never take our focus off of Jesus.
 
Upvote 0