- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,070
- 16,820
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Well, since humans are primates, I'm not sure what differences you're talking about.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are we only enzymes away from the primates becoming human? I could have sworn there was more to our differences than that...
Circular reasoning...
...you assume the fossil bearing layer represents something
Fossils are organisms.
By Creationism I assume you are referring to the first chapter in the Bible. Genesis Chapter two on is more of a history book covering the last 6,000 years. If you want to falsify the Bible then you would have to produce some sort of evidence to show that the Bible is wrong.How can Creationism be falsified?
By Creationism I assume you are referring to the first chapter in the Bible. Genesis Chapter two on is more of a history book covering the last 6,000 years. If you want to falsify the Bible then you would have to produce some sort of evidence to show that the Bible is wrong.
It would be impossible to show that the Bible is wrong. All the evidence that Science has shows that the Bible is accurate and true. Science and the Bible need each other. Science shows us the Bible is true and the Bible shows us when Science is accurate and true. Like your left and right hand. The scientific method is a way we can show that the Bible is accurate and true.What evidence would need to be found in order to show that the Bible is wrong?
It would be impossible to show that the Bible is wrong. All the evidence that Science has shows that the Bible is accurate and true.
The Bible talks about four rivers. This is a map that shows us where the Garden of Eden was. Right now if we use space photography like google earth this would indicate that the Garden of Eden in the Bible is under the Persian gulf north of the Straits of Hormuz. We know from our Biology book what a biodiverse ecosystem is. We know a lot about the Botany in the the Middle East. We know how the plants and the animals evolved in this part of the world. None of what science has to offer contradicts anything that we read in our Bible about the Plants and Animals that we find in the Middle East.I am not asking about the evidence we have found, at least not for the moment. I am asking a hypothetical. What evidence would science need to find in the future in order to show that the Bible is wrong? How do you determine if evidence supports or disproves the Bible?
The Bible talks about four rivers. This is a map that shows us where the Garden of Eden was. Right now if we use space photography like google earth this would indicate that the Garden of Eden in the Bible is under the Persian gulf north of the Straits of Hormuz. We know from our Biology book what a biodiverse ecosystem is. We know a lot about the Botany in the the Middle East. We know how the plants and the animals evolved in this part of the world. None of what science has to offer contradicts anything that we read in our Bible about the Plants and Animals that we find in the Middle East.
So you tell me, how do you prove if an allegory is true or not?
NOTHING contradicts the Bible. You can not contradict the Bible and you can not falsify the Bible. Man can be corrupted. His understanding can be corrupted. You can not corrupt God and you can not corrupt the Word of God.Then what would contradict the Bible?
NOTHING contradicts the Bible.
You can not contradict the Bible and you can not falsify the Bible. Man can be corrupted. His understanding can be corrupted. You can not corrupt God and you can not corrupt the Word of God.
the words of the LORD are flawless, like silver purified in a crucible, like gold refined seven times. Psalm 12 6
Anything that would contradict Science would contradict the Bible. You can not contradict one without contradicting the other. Pat Robertson in his book teaches that the laws in the Bible are just as valid as the laws of thermodynamics or the law of gravity. So in your opinion what would contradict the law of gravity? Even though there is some difference between Newton and Einstein when it comes to gravity, they both are talking about the exact same law.What would contradict the Bible, if found?
Anything that would contradict Science would contradict the Bible.
Pat Robertson in his book teaches that the laws in the Bible are just as valid as the laws of thermodynamics or the law of gravity.
So in your opinion what would contradict the law of gravity?
Just as weight occurs when gravity is resisted, religion occurs when the Bible is resisted.Anything that would contradict Science would contradict the Bible.
I think not.The orbit of Mercury contradicted the law of gravity.
You do not have any evidence. I forget the name of the commentary but there was a book written by a Catholic Seminary dropout that made everything in the Bible look like it is wrong and in error. But every one of those so called contradictions was based on the same faulty logic and reason. We can go over this as many times as you want until you finally understand that the Bible is just as predictable and testable as anything science has to offer. If anyone thinks there is a problem with the Bible it always turns out that the problem is in their logic, reason, understanding and their missed attempt to understand the truth. That is why we are told let God be true and every man a liar. (Romans 3:4) The Bible stands up to every test that the Scientific Method has. That is why we are told: "come let us reason together" (Isaiah 1:18)Can I interpret this as stating that no matter what evidence we will find, you will never accept it as showing the Bible to be wrong?
I am talking about gravity itself. Not man's vain attempt to understand or explain gravity. We know that the universe is very accurate and precise. Math is very predictable. You can use the scientific method to study gravity. In the same way the laws we find in the Bible are just as accurate and predictable as the laws of science are. Pat Robertson in his book talks about: The law of reciprocity, the law of use, the law of perseverance and so on. Thomas Edison knew about the law of perseverance. As a construction worker I know that you do not quit. You keep working and eventually you will finish the project. Even when everything looks impossible you keep working on a solution and eventually you will find a way to get it to work.The orbit of Mercury contradicted the law of gravity.
I am talking about gravity itself. Not man's vain attempt to understand or explain gravity.
We know that the universe is very accurate and precise.
Math is very predictable.
You can use the scientific method to study gravity. In the same way the laws we find in the Bible are just as accurate and predictable as the laws of science are.
Then I'm Genghis Khan.The Bible is also man's vain attempt to understand nature.
Tell that to these guys:Loudmouth said:It can be wrong just like Newton's Law of Gravity was wrong.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?