Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Circular reasoning. You said you can't communicate with someone unless they believe the bible is the source of truth. Faith is through hearing.The truth of Scripture... which you say is not the source of truth...
You were not baptized as an infant. You were wetted. As you said, if the individual being baptized doesn’t believe, then they just got wet, there is no salvation in that act.I am only discouraging people from thinking baptism, not faith, is how we are saved. That idea flies out a window when you consider the fact that despite being baptized during infancy, I was not ready to become a Christian for the next 20 years. If you don't believe in the Trinity, baptism is just getting wet.
Yes, but Jesus had not yet died at that point. Until he dies, a man’s Will can be changed as he sees fit. So too, until He died, Christ could do anything He wanted in terms of who He saved.At what point was the thief on the cross baptized? and yet Jesus saved him.
You are correct that baptism doesn’t save us. It is the Holy Spirit who saves us during baptism. Read in Rom 6:1-11 and Col 2:11-14 that it is during baptism that the Spirit takes action to cut our sins from us and unite us with Christ. That is when we are saved.I agree that baptism in itself doesn't do the saving. It's accepting Jesus' testimony as the only Son of God and only way of salvation through His sacrifice on the cross. In other words believing Jesus is who He says He is and accepting Him as Lord. Baptism is a beautiful declaration of that salvation. So yes I am against infant baptisms because they don't understand what's happening nor know who Jesus is yet.
So being wetted as a pre-teen makes all the difference?You were not baptized as an infant. You were wetted. As you said, if the individual being baptized doesn’t believe, then they just got wet, there is no salvation in that act.
Sorry, but that is incorrect.But baptism has never been connected to (a requirement for) a person receiving God's free gift of Eternal Life. The only requirement to receive God's free gift of Eternal Life is to believe,trust in The Messiah for God's free gift.
No, being wetted make NO difference. There is no salvation in getting wet as an infant.So being wetted as a pre-teen makes all the difference?
Strange logic, that.
Your whole approach is wrong anyway because being baptized does not insure salvation. Hardly any church which baptizes without an unscriptural age requirement DOES think baptism guarantees salvation.Sorry, but that is incorrect.
Repentance is required to receive forgiveness (salvation) - Acts 3:19 and many others.
Confession of Jesus as Lord publicly is required - Rom 10:9-10
Baptism is required - Acts 2:38, Mark 16:16, and many others.
No, being wetted make NO difference. There is no salvation in getting wet as an infant.
If one was not already saved, the water just got them all wet!You were not baptized as an infant. You were wetted. As you said, if the individual being baptized doesn’t believe, then they just got wet, there is no salvation in that act.
No, most of us don't baptize by submersion, therefore it would just be your head. So not to worry! And there's no reason to fear drowning, either!If one was not already saved, the water just got them all wet!
At what point was the thief on the cross baptized? and yet Jesus saved him.
Sorry, but that is incorrect.
Repentance is required to receive forgiveness (salvation) - Acts 3:19 and many others.
Confession of Jesus as Lord publicly is required - Rom 10:9-10
Baptism is required - Acts 2:38, Mark 16:16, and many others.
It is not the “public display” that saves. It is obedience to the Living God. And there was nothing g in his post that did not come directly from Scripture.It's facsinating how people who stand firmly on the revealed word of God feel no hesitation about writing some of it themselves.
And this ^ doesn't even make sense, all the theology aside.
Standing in front of a congregation and having water poured on your head sure as anything does amount to a "public display," every bit as much as having a minister baptize you in your backyard swimming pool!
So you need to go back and STUDY the Scriptures again.We went around and around about this on another thread a few days ago. Noting has changed from my perspective, so i really do not see the need to further go around and around again.
You are correct that baptism doesn’t save us. It is the Holy Spirit who saves us during baptism. Read in Rom 6:1-11 and Col 2:11-14 that it is during baptism that the Spirit takes action to cut our sins from us and unite us with Christ. That is when we are saved.
Are you saying that very few Church congratulations believe that baptism is the point of salvation? You are correct: there are very few congregations that teach the Biblical truth on this topic.Your whole approach is wrong anyway because being baptized does not insure salvation. Hardly any church which baptizes without an unscriptural age requirement DOES think baptism guarantees salvation.
So you need to go back and STUDY the Scriptures again.
Not at all. It make a great deal of difference is you believe in Christ. Ask Naaman if dipping (being baptized) in Jordan seven times made a difference.You just said being wetted makes no difference. That would mean it makes no difference if you're an adult, either. And that would mean that no baptismal ceremony is worth doing, despite the Bible's call for believers to be baptized!