You mean the con-man that claimed to have angels speak to him and who said that it is blasphemous to speak about the father, the son and the holy spirit? He was against the trinity, you know.
But I'm sure you ignored that part. You just picked him because he kickstarted the whole faith-healing movement. That's the kind of opportunistic person you are... pick a few things that you feel support the point you are making at that particular time, and just ignore everything that contradicts your beliefs.
It's so pathetic.
.
You need to do some research on William Branham. You are glazing the top only? There is only 4 years of thousands upon thousands of Supernatural events manifested and witnessed before citywide meetings.
And you skimmed to reply the above info? And follow with erroneous statements?
.
Last edited:
Upvote
0