House releases overview of evidence against Biden

[Ana the Ist]

Right. Less of course all those who served time in jail. Sentenced to jail. And indicted.

Well most of those were "not cooperating" with what turned out to be a bogus investigation anyway.

 

[Say it aint so]

Well most of those were "not cooperating" with what turned out to be a bogus investigation anyway.

That must be it. A bogus investigation that sent people to jail. Sentenced people. Indicted people.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Doesn't answer my question. I know the claim is abuse of power, but what abuse of power in particular?

If you're not going to even look at the evidence presented, don't ask for evidence.

The IRS agents have not one thing to do with Joe Biden. But feel free to impeach Hunter.

The Bidens have 20 million going through various shell corporations.

You know what a shell corporation is, don't you?

 

[Ana the Ist]

Doesn't answer my question. I know the claim is abuse of power, but what abuse of power in particular?
The IRS agents have not one thing to do with Joe Biden. But feel free to impeach Hunter.

I'll try this again...

Because we're talking about IRS agents who specialize in international fraud, tax evasion and money laundering.

They're part of a highly specialized team of just 12 agents in Washington DC who do this. There's literally no one better.

Does the agent say...


"I didn't have any evidence this led back to the President."


Or


"We had evidence leading back to the President, but we weren't allowed to follow-up on it."


Which one?

 

[Always in His Presence]

Which means nothing. Specially since Sept 21, 2017. Joe is a private citizen.

Except for the fact that Biden stated repeated times he was not involved in Hunters business, and new nothing about it.

Then there are those pesky 170 suspicious activity reports that the bank filed with the government.

 

[NxNW]

Like receiving more than 20,000,000 dollars from foreign sources and filtering through 20 shell corporations?

Questions are not evidence.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Questions are not evidence.

There is no question in the post you quoted - I don't have a clue to what you are referring to.

170 different suspicious activity reports from banks - filed as required by the Dept of Homeland Security, blocked by the Biden Administration from the Congress - which they had the rights to do until he came into office. That is something needing an investigation.

20,000,000 to Biden family members through 20 different shell companies and an active 1023. The bank records Joe is not allowing the treasury department to release, would exonerate or convict him. Why is he not allowing their release?

 

[Say it aint so]

If you're not going to even look at the evidence presented, don't ask for evidence.




The Bidens have 20 million going through various shell corporations.

You know what a shell corporation is, don't you?

1) I can't find any evidence of abuse of power by Joe Biden in the allegations. Perhaps unlike Comer of Jordan, you can lay that out.
2) You mean the companies that Hunter was associated with had 20 million. 7m went to Hunter, the rest to multiple non family associates.
3) Yes I know what a shell company is. Companies that have business functions and produce a service are not shell companies.

 

[Say it aint so]

I'll try this again...

Because we're talking about IRS agents who specialize in international fraud, tax evasion and money laundering.

They're part of a highly specialized team of just 12 agents in Washington DC who do this. There's literally no one better.

Does the agent say...


"I didn't have any evidence this led back to the President."


Or


"We had evidence leading back to the President, but we weren't allowed to follow-up on it."


Which one?

You are the one claiming evidence Joe Biden abused power. Make your case. Show where the agents implicate Biden.

 

[Say it aint so]

Except for the fact that Biden stated repeated times he was not involved in Hunters business, and new nothing about it.

Then there are those pesky 170 suspicious activity reports that the bank filed with the government.

So what concludes for you providing the sharing of a office by two separate businesses means Joe Biden and Jill Biden were involved with Hunter's business? Keep in mind Joe and Jill live in Delaware. Would it be out of the question to share an office with Joe's son for their separate family foundation?

 

[Always in His Presence]

So what concludes for you providing the sharing of a office by two separate businesses means Joe Biden and Jill Biden were involved with Hunter's business? Keep in mind Joe and Jill live in Delaware. Would it be out of the question to share an office with Joe's son for their separate family foundation?

Oh, the pictures of Joe with Hunter and their business partners in the White House - in the VP residence - on visitor logs from the Whitehouse - in emails and by direct testimony.

 

[Say it aint so]

Oh, the pictures of Joe with Hunter and their business partners in the White House - in the VP residence - on visitor logs from the Whitehouse - in emails and by direct testimony.

Again, so what does that mean? To infer that means they were all in business together is just not there.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I think this is a good graphic:

 

[Always in His Presence]

Again, so what does that mean? To infer that means they were all in business together is just not there.

Connected with millions of dollars being transferred to shell corporations - it means a whole lot.

 

[Say it aint so]

Connected with millions of dollars being transferred to shell corporations - it means a whole lot.

Companies that have a function and provide services aren't shell companies. In the Oversight report, one of the 20 has the attributes of being a shell company. And shockingly, those companies like all companies are in the pursuit of making money for product or services rendered. So yes, they made millions. Again, where is Joe implicated by evidence that is actions are high crimes and misdemeanors?

 

[USincognito]

Oh, conflicting stories…. Something that should be investigated.

It's been three years. You'd think if there was a connection someone would have made it vy now.

 

[Ana the Ist]

1) I can't find any evidence of abuse of power by Joe Biden in the allegations. Perhaps unlike Comer of Jordan, you can lay that out.
2) You mean the companies that Hunter was associated with had 20 million. 7m went to Hunter, the rest to multiple non family associates.
3) Yes I know what a shell company is. Companies that have business functions and produce a service are not shell companies.

Ok...so what are we talking about?

I'm sorry @Say it aint so , I'm going to be taking the word of the highly experienced and decorated team of international crime experts who sacrificed their jobs over some internet rando who can't be bothered to watch a short video.

If they say they found evidence....there's probably evidence.

 

[USincognito]

Then there are those pesky 170 suspicious activity reports that the bank filed with the government.

What, exactly is "pesky" about them? The only thing that makes such transfers "suspicious" is that they're an amount over $10,000 there's probably 10,000 generated every day.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Again, so what does that mean? To infer that means they were all in business together is just not there.

Think of those IRS whistleblowers as the "Dr Faucis" of international crime if that helps lol.

You're never going to have any effect on their claims of evidence. They know what these crimes look like, you dont.

 

[Always in His Presence]

1) I can't find any evidence of abuse of power by Joe Biden in the allegations. Perhaps unlike Comer of Jordan, you can lay that out.
2) You mean the companies that Hunter was associated with had 20 million. 7m went to Hunter, the rest to multiple non family associates.
3) Yes I know what a shell company is. Companies that have business functions and produce a service are not shell companies.

Ana said it best:

Ok...so what are we talking about?

I'm sorry @Say it aint so , I'm going to be taking the word of the highly experienced and decorated team of international crime experts who sacrificed their jobs over some internet rando who can't be bothered to watch a short video.

If they say they found evidence....there's probably evidence.