Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
1. How does evolution account for the doctrine of Original Sin?
2. How does evolution account for the Adamic Nature?
3. How does evolution explain Ussher's time line?
4. How does evolution explain Jesus being a man?
I would like this thread to be open for any of the lurkers that have questions about evolution, science and it's impact on Christianity.
Please just honest questions about the subjects, I tire of the standard creationist vs evolutionist claptrap.
OK. Here is a serious one:
People suggested that Christianity is the foundation of the modern science. Is it a valid idea?
Maybe it had better start then.
There are too many hurdles that evolution has to clear, if I am to accept it as a viable explanation for anything other than my Roundup losing its efficacy at year's end.
My Boolean standards end at my Prime Directive.You don't have to accept it. You just have to use your "boolean standards" to partake in the benefits of this false doctrine.
It doesn't. Research into evolution will continue in spite of and regardless of how persistently other people assume nonsensical things to be true. It has no comment on original sin, no comment on the "Adamic Nature" and couldn't care less about Ussher. Your hangups with evolution not fitting into claims you're assuming are true are your problem, no-one elses.1. How does evolution account for the doctrine of Original Sin?
2. How does evolution account for the Adamic Nature?
3. How does evolution explain Ussher's time line?
4. How does evolution explain Jesus being a man?
Scientific theories in no way seeks to explain myths. It would be akin to asking how our current understanding of electrical thunderstorms explains how big Thor's hammer is.1. How does evolution account for the doctrine of Original Sin?
2. How does evolution account for the Adamic Nature?
3. How does evolution explain Ussher's time line?
4. How does evolution explain Jesus being a man?
May I assume then that that is your answer to the OP as well?It doesn't. Research into evolution will continue in spite of and regardless of how persistently other people assume nonsensical things to be true. It has no comment on original sin, no comment on the "Adamic Nature" and couldn't care less about Ussher.
My Boolean standards end at my Prime Directive.
So, are you saying that you won't use any technology, medicine, or whatever that used evolutionary theory in its development?
What technology uses macroevolution in its development?So, are you saying that you won't use any technology, medicine, or whatever that used evolutionary theory in its development?
What technology uses macroevolution in its development?
Then you won't mind if I go ahead and use 'technology, medicine, or whatever', will you?Macro and micro evolution have the same mechanism. It's all evolution.
Then you won't mind if I go ahead and use 'technology, medicine, or whatever', will you?
Not a chance.Depends on whether you want to accept evolution, both micro and macro.
Not a chance.
I don't run on the all-or-ridicule principle.
1 x 0 = ?Accepting micro without macro is like saying addition and subtraction exist but multiplication and division don't.
Accepting micro without macro is like saying addition and subtraction exist but multiplication and division don't when they hit a boundary (0) they cannot cross.1 x 0 = 0
1/0 = universe explodes
your point?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?