By who, exactly? The subject of the thread, or by the far right propagandists making up things she never said?Because it’s not just a small minority that’s being labeled with those terms.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
By who, exactly? The subject of the thread, or by the far right propagandists making up things she never said?Because it’s not just a small minority that’s being labeled with those terms.
One where the president declares those in question a threat to national security.
She's just the one who let the cat out of the bag.By who, exactly? The subject of the thread, or by the far right propagandists making up things she never said?
I'm pretty sure that most people understand the far right extremists she was talking about are a bit nuts. Jewish space lasers, anyone?She's just the one who let the cat out of the bag.
He most certainly didn't limit it to them.I think most any responsible leader would condemn in the strongest terms possible those who conspired against the US Government to attack the US Capitol.
Don't you get dizzy going in circles like that?This feels like one of those cases where it might not be best to invite such facts into a thread discussing the most dangerous elements of far right ideology. Better to stick with the whole "they're just being persecuted for political beliefs" approach and leave out the whole using violence to try and invalidate an election their leader lost.
non-left = far right. And they're mad as badgers you know, and therefore in need of "deprogramming".I'm pretty sure that most people understand the far right extremists she was talking about are a bit nuts. Jewish space lasers, anyone?
That would be because you can’t make up your mind what you want taken seriouslyThat being a symptom of the problem. You can't seem to understand when someone is making a serious comment or not.
What she can do and what she wishes she could do are two different things. We know that. But we take what she said seriouslyIt seems you're equating her making a rather tongue-in-cheek comment about MAGA extremists behaving like a cult for a policy statement about a law she would like passed. She did not actually propose any such law. Nor, frankly, can she at this point. She isn't in office anywhere.
-- A2SG, just so we're clear......
I'm guessing it's knows she was serious but doesn't want to admit it.That would be because you can’t make up your mind what you want taken seriously
There's always the possibility that what she said is something that's been discussed behind closed doors.What she can do and what she wishes she could do are two different things. We know that. But we take what she said seriously
Not according to the source quoted in the OP.non-left = far right. And they're mad as badgers you know, and therefore in need of "deprogramming".
He most certainly didn't limit it to them.
Don't you get dizzy going in circles like that?
There's a separate conspiracy theory section here for a reason.There's always the possibility that what she said is something that's been discussed behind closed doors.
I'm not the one pushing that the non-left are a radical cult of deplorables in need of deprogramming.Not according to the source quoted in the OP.
But hey, if you want to make the argument that the GOP has been radicalized, go for it.
Enough has been said out loud, in addition to Hillary's disclosure, to where that's hardly far fetched. They can't very well go on about others being a threat to national security cult, while claiming they mean them no ill will.There's a separate conspiracy theory section here for a reason.
No one is"pushing", much less proposing any such thing. That is a fiction invented by some on the non-left.I'm not the one pushing that the non-left are a radical cult of deplorables in need of deprogramming.
Proposing is just a euphemism for pushing, as in pushing the idea that they are making up all the stuff that's being broadcast against them.No one is"pushing", much less proposing any such thing. That is a fiction invented by some on the non-left.
"Not X, much less Y" is a common English construction meaning "neither X nor Y" with the added flavor of "not only not X, but it doesn't rise even to the lower threshold of Y".Proposing is just a euphemism for pushing, as in pushing the idea that they are making up all the stuff that's being broadcast against them.
Since no one is pushing or proposing, your retort is nonsensical.Proposing is just a euphemism for pushing, as in pushing the idea that they are making up all the stuff that's being broadcast against them.
Who is claiming that she proposed a law?She may have been, but that doesn't mean she was proposing a law to do that.
I'm sure they will. Just as I'm sure no actual law ever will.
-- A2SG, nor even an attempt to create one......