Hello Daddy, when is the accident over?

[Dannager]

Like myself, for instance. My previous post was a somewhat sarcastic way of saying that the things he equated had nothing to do with each other (apples and oranges).

I really don't like when people pit evolution against creation, as if they're opposite or mutually exclusive. I am very much a creationist; I believe that God created the heavens and the earth and that all that exists owes its existance God. However, I find no problem with theories that try to explain the history of the universe and of life. If the universe is very old, so be it. If it's young, so be it.

So as a creationist who has a decent layman's grasp on what evolution, plate techtonics, etc. are (and are not), it bothers me to see posts like the OP. Not every person who believes in creation believes that the standard of christian orthodoxy is that the earth is very young. It would behoove the YEC world to get a better grasp of what "secular scientists" actually believe and what their conclusions actually are.

Psa 19:1-2 The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. Day to day pours out speech, and night to night reveals knowledge.

It seems odd that God would tell us that the heavens reveal Him and give us knowledge, but then deliberately make them so that they give us a different story than He revealed in Scripture.

Ah, I stand corrected. I checked your Origin of Life View but it's too vague to determine which side you're coming from. Good for you.

 

[MrSnow]

Ah, I stand corrected. I checked your Origin of Life View but it's too vague to determine which side you're coming from. Good for you.

I firmly believe that all that exists owes its existance to God. But as far as how God did it all, I believe that that is beyond the scope of Scripture. It is intentionally vague, as I do not cling to either view, since I think that either side could be right (old or young). I really don't think it matters (although I tend to lean towards it being old). Either way, we're here now, we're sinners, and we need a savior.

 

[Dannager]

I firmly believe that all that exists owes its existance to God. But as far as how God did it all, I believe that that is beyond the scope of Scripture. It is intentionally vague, as I do not cling to either view, since I think that either side could be right (old or young). I really don't think it matters (although I tend to lean towards it being old). Either way, we're here now, we're sinners, and we need a savior.

Oh. I think what was being referred to was the lack of young-earth creationists correcting their own. That's what is usually meant here when the word "creationist" is used (to distinguish, we use Theistic Evolutionist to describe the other camp).

 

[MrSnow]

Oh. I think what was being referred to was the lack of young-earth creationists correcting their own. That's what is usually meant here when the word "creationist" is used (to distinguish, we use Theistic Evolutionist to describe the other camp).

I have noticed that. What I think happens is that when a YEC sees the "creation vs theist evolution", many of them think that we don't believe that God created things. So I prefer YEC vs TE, or YEC vs OEC, or something else like that.

 

[Dannager]

I have noticed that. What I think happens is that when a YEC sees the "creation vs theist evolution", many of them think that we don't believe that God created things. So I prefer YEC vs TE, or YEC vs OEC, or something else like that.

Yeah, the lingo does get dropped every once in a while.