Wiccan_Child said:
Doesn't it bother you to based things on faith, on the unseen, on the unknown?
It doesn't.
Because I experienced what I know and I already have it.Why not experiencing what I don't know and never see.
I lived the material life and knew by the sense of touching the difference between the cold and the hot, the dead and the alive, the dangerous and the safe...etc. but why do I have to touch while I already have the knowledge to make me not use my five senses.
And don't forget that there are humans living among us, who can't see, can't hear, can't touch/walk, can't taste/speak, can't smell and can't think. Do you think that they belong to your world of Athiests or our world of believers? You give them one chance which is this life by throwing them on hard rocks. But believers do tell them that they have another chance to get what they lost and more.
Athiests life is for the lucky and the happy but believers' life is for the sick, the poor, the sad, the disabled, the blind, the deaf..etc.
You might give them help but you can't give them back what they lost.
And you take hope from them that this life is their only chance and they will never have what they lost.
Perhaps, but that's hardly an argument for theism, is it? We want to know what
is, not what feels good. It's all very well and good pretending to the blind and infirm that there is some magical hereafter where all their dreams come true, but that doesn't tell us whether it actually exists.
Heavenly teachings teach us that we are all equal and will be treated equally. Some Athiests problem is that they don't think of anyone else but themselves. Their sight is so short which goes no further than their shadow.
That is the problem of some theists too.
Athiests can never live without their five senses to learn about the material world.
But I prefered to use my spirit to learn. Because without it, I will be dead and not able to learn.
Spiritual wit is higher than materialistic wit. The first is based on what you can't see, hear, touch, smell or taste unlike the second one.
Why do you accept inventions that never exist before while you can't use your spirit ( the unseen )?
My mind is free of human limits when I think spiritually but I will be bounded forever to what theories says whenever I use my materialistic thinking.
You forget that these theories have to be thought up in the first place. Where do you think the Einsteinian model of spacetime came from?
Wiccan_Child said:
There's a lot of things we can't see, and that we don't know. I can't see fairies at the bottom of my garden; should I have faith in them, too?
And why do you have to believe in fairies?
We believe in Angels because they guard us, they pray to the Almighty to save us, they carried the Heavenly message to prophets and they saved many prophets from danger.
To believe in something means that you are connected to it.
I can say that I don't believe in dragons because it has nothing to do with religion. I didn't see them and they are only mentioned in fairytales.
When you believe in a religion means that this belief has a direct impact on your spirit and your life.
I disagree. When I say I believe in something, I'm saying I think it exists, or I think it's true. You say you believe in angels, and God. Why?
Wiccan_Child said:
No, we don't. We have spiritual people telling us that it exists, but they've never actually said what it is, or given us any reason to believe it exists. It's like those garden fairies.
Your question about the spirit ( the soul ) was asked to prophet Muhammed ( peace be upon him) 1500 years ago:
17:85
And they ask you, [O Muhammad], about the soul. Say, "The soul is of the affair of my Lord. And mankind have not been given of knowledge except a little."
But you might think of the first human.
Who was he?
Where did he come from?
How he became alive after being a statue of clay while he has all his organs? What was the missing thing in his creation to make all of his organs alive?
I do not believe the first human was a statue of clay. I don't even believe there was a first human at all.
Are you asking what separates living flesh from, say, rocks?
Wiccan_Child said:
If we can't see it, feel it, or prove it, how do we know ___ 'One' is actually creating anything at all?
Then explain to me the changing of weather? Why weather changes from normal into natural disasters? It is the space influence on the Earth. So, what is the thing that changes the space? What is that power?
Notice that everything is depending on the other like the circle of life.
Why it is only the humans ( who can think ) are the ones who can never be in harmony all of them all together like nature?
Why creatures that humans can't control have their own system which never failed. Why Earth is created before humans?
Why does it have the round shape which we don't know where the starting point is.
I could answer all of those questions without once appealing to some 'Creator' or 'One', but I don't think that's what you're looking for.
Why everything in life should have a starting point and ending point.
And the circle is called the life of a particular plant or an animal.
If the earth didn't have humans when it was created, then this means that it didn't have plants, animals, water, land.....etc.
This means that humans arrived after a series of additionals to the Earth. Who added them? And if nature is creating itself? why didn't it creat itself all at once- plants, animals, humans....etc.
Because nature takes time. It is, after all, just one big system interacting with itself. You can't have humans before you have the Earth, so that is why everything wasn't created at once: some things just so happened to come after others, and some things necessarily came after others.
The real question is: why
should everything have come at once?
just look at the different natures of everything on Earth. Plants can't bring out animals and animals can't creat plants while humans are not capable of creating animals or plants. So, who have this Power if it is not the nature? Why do you believe in world powers while you are not able to believe in the Creator?
Because I can
see world powers, but I
can't see a Creator. All the evidence in the world points to a natural, mundane, and unguided origin of life, the Earth, and the universe.
We know how life can form on its own, without some divine Creator being involved. We know how planets and stars and galaxies can form on their own.
There is nothing in this universe that requires a Creator as an explanation, though I would very much like it if you could cite an example to the contrary.
But this is to show you that there is always the One who created everything.
It would help if you actually showed something, instead of resorting to rhetoric and sophistry.