- Feb 5, 2002
- 190,604
- 70,620
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Hell as infinite punishment
When Thomas describes the justice of the infinitude of hellfire, he seems to mean something like this:
While Thomas sometimes uses the language of infinite guilt, he reduces it to a permanent outcome, i.e. if, in the time you have to accept it, you reject the one thing that can save, you have, well, rejected the one thing that saves in the one time you could have accepted it. The justice of hell is more a logical inference than a declaration of positive law.Some bad decisions have permanent outcomes for which there is no remedy.
Allowing the bad outcome of a bad decision can be a just punishment.
Some just punishments allow permanent outcomes for which there is no remedy.
As always with discussions of Hell as divine punishment, the insight into God is relatively superficial. We don’t have as deep an insight into God by meditating on his justice than by meditating on his mercy. The damned manifest something of divine glory, but the relatively swallower and less proper parts of it.
Hell as infinite punishment
When Thomas describes the justice of the infinitude of hellfire, he seems to mean something like this: Some bad decisions have permanent outcomes for which there is no remedy. Allowing the bad outc…