In my opinion both
@Carl Emerson and
@Jipsah have a pious and correct view of the demonic and you are both predominantly correct because of your shared Anglican heritage. In high church Anglicanism, priests will exorcise the water used in baptism, and salt, and bless both, and make a sign of the cross using the blessed salt in the water before performing the baptism, and the Orthodox and other ancient churches also do this, and this to me does suggest
@Carl Emerson is correct in that objects can be desecrated, and be potentially occult, particularly idols and other things fashioned with occult purposes, not because of any intrinsic properties to the objects I think but rather because of the interface between the human perception of the object and the whisphering suggestions demons make to bolster that perception of spiritual power, which Christians instinctively react to negatively, if they notice it at all. Insofar as this effect depends on perception
@Jipsah is correct. Exorcising the objects removes any demons from them, and it also has a profound psychological impact so even if other demons are in the area, since the object is now perceived to be safe.
It is my belief that clergy should perform the exorcism and blessing of objects wherever possible, both because of our theological training and discernment, and also because from the vital perceptual aspect many people will be more convinced if we do it.
So in essence
@Jipsah and
@Carl Emerson my belief is you are both correct, although you don’t realize it, due to the shared tradition of the Book of Common Prayer which differentiates the two of you from non-liturgical Christians like our friend
@ARBITER01 , whose position on this issue I reject.
Now I personally would not accept a healing crystal as a gift and if one were given to me I would break it up into pieces and form them into a cross, if possible, or combine it with other crystals to make a cross, because as you both know, demons cannot tolerate the sign of the cross, so by doing that any possible demonic influence would be obviated. That said, I am not afraid of healing crystals; rather i regard their use as a form of spiritual delusion, or prelest, but I don’t wish to surround myself with them or other occult objects because there is a Patristic witness within Orthodoxy that says that is a bad idea. For that matter I don’t visit occult bookstores, since they are filled with books I don’t want and lack any books that I do want. For that matter I usually avoid Christian bookstores except for those at Orthodox, Anglican and Catholic and other liturgical churches because usually they don’t have anything of interest in me either. For me the litmus test of a Christian bookstore is: does it carry any kind of liturgical books, such as editions of the Book of Common Prayer, or missals, or Orthodox liturgical books like the Triodion, the Octoechos and the Menaion, and also various prayer books that follow the liturgy, and does it carry any editions of the Bible with the “deuterocanonical” books which we regard as protocanonical, sacred, and important in the Orthodox Church, books like Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, Tobit, 2 Maccabees and so on? And also does it have icons? If not, count me out. I have no interest in buying a CD of Hillsong or a copy of the writings of someone like Hal Lindsay.