Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is the SAME thread reread the first page.So you're wanting to continue a discussion from a diffrent thread here in this thread?[/FONT]
Naming one as the Enemy of the Week does not necessarily call one a traitor, as I previously mentioned.
My mistake. You attributed a quote to me that I didn't make instead. I'm having trouble figuring out your point since your bringing up things that aren't part of the discussionThis is the SAME thread reread the first page.
Hannity himself recently defines it as someone who "threatens the very fabric of this country".
http://mediamatters.org/items/200701160010
And he was referring to Michael Nifong, the Durham NC DA in the Duke lacrosse team rape case.
Enemy of the State, Enemy of the Week, anyone is up for grabs; Hannity's desperate attempts to get ratings and attention, ala Ann Coulter, is based on slandering others to get it.
There seems to be a problem with those pagesAm I the only one who can't access page 9 and 10 of this thread?
There seems to be a problem with those pages
post 81 to 100 is MIAAm I the only one who can't access page 9 and 10 of this thread?
At least Hannity operates in the free market.
http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7150
Wow...they monitor all forms of media for conservative misinformation...that's some busy, busy people.
I have to pay for my cable. Is somebody getting cable for free???
Not only that:Wow...they monitor all forms of media for conservative misinformation...that's some busy, busy people.
the organization's concept of "misinformation" includes anything that "forwards the conservative agenda." Thus political differences of opinion are often portrayed by Media Matters as lies or worse.
I never attributed the quote to you. I said that YOU asked for the link that was provided byt the person quoted.My mistake. You attributed a quote to me that I didn't make instead. I'm having trouble figuring out your point since your bringing up things that aren't part of the discussion
You quoted me, then added a quote without a name giving the distinct impression that I made both quotes. At any rate, your point doesn't seem to follow the spirit of the discussionI never attributed the quote to you. I said that YOU asked for the link that was provided byt the person quoted.
Well, it does, I've been trying to get information on this and received nothing but dodges to it.You quoted me, then added a quote without a name giving the distinct impression that I made both quotes. At any rate, your point doesn't seem to follow the spirit of the discussion
So? Good for Media MattersDon't see any difference between how a cable channel is funded and the funding of Media Matters by James Hormel, Peter Lewis, George Soros and other mega-rich liberal operatives ?
One can go out of business if enough people don't tune in.
Why can't liberals at least link to the New York Times or other liberal newspapers? Media Matters is simply a Democratic Party operation (the left wing of the party).
Not very equalitarian or working class, if I may say so, to repeatedly use a source which is funded by a very small, very elite circle of the richest people in America.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?