
Well, we do
know John 11:48 was fulfilled just as the Jews feared. Without his witness, we would be hard pressed to prove a Sanctuary and Temple ever existed.
John 11:48 "If ever we should be letting Him thus, all shall be believing in Him, and shall be coming the Romans and they shall be snatching-away of us and the Place and the nation."
It certainly would seem that the Pharisees loved the place (I always read that to mean their place of status) and the 'nation' more than they loved the truth. One could easily draw analogies to present time.
Reve 6:6 and I heard a voice in the midst of the four living creatures saying, `A measure of wheat for a Denary, and three measures of barley for a Denary,' and `The oil and the wine thou mayest not injure.'
This is one of the powerful associations between Rev and the happenings of that time. This was recorded almost word for word by Josephus.
http://www.davieapostolicchurch.com/studies/destuct/
Thanks for the link.
Among the terrible calamities which at this time happened to the Jews, those which befel them at Joppa, which had been rebuilt, deserve particular notice. Their frequent piracies had provoked the vengeance of Vespasian. (Nothing new under the sun, my comments). The Jews fled before his army to their ships ; but a tempest immediately arose, and pursued such as stood out to sea, and overset them, while the rest were dashed vessel against vessel, and against the rocks, in the most tremendous manner. In this perplexity many were drowned, some were crushed by the broken ships, others killed themselves, and such as reached the shore were slain by the merciless Romans. The sea for a long space was stained with blood ; four thousand two hundred dead bodies were strewed along the coast, and, dreadful to relate, not an individual survived to report this great calamity at Jerusalem.
Isaiah 59:18 According to [their] deeds, accordingly he will repay, fury to his adversaries, recompence to his enemies;
to the islands he will repay recompence.
By the way, this is the understanding I am beginning to see from Rom 11. Being that the unelect part of the jews were blinded unto/until the fullness of the Gentiles come in. This fulness is refering to the full season and full army of the Roman armies, similar to Jesus' times of the gentiles be fulfilled.
But in the Holy Spirits and Pauls wisdom, there is a dual interpretation that was able to be taken from reading the verses for those who would not be able to accept and understand this vengence at that time. Or for those to whom it was intended to be hidden. I think this is why Paul (like Jesus when he quoted Isaiah 61) did not quote the whole passage, but only that which would not give away the upcoming destruction. And that dual interpretation would be that the fullness of the Gentiles also referred to the gentile converts who were filled with Gods spirit, causing jealousy in some of the yet unsaved, but yet to be elect Jews.
The idea that until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled would again refer to a restored jewish nation is defeated by the choice of words Paul used when talking about the Gifts and calling of God that is irrevocable. He didn't say the promises and prophecies are irrevocable or even infer those words. Thus those Gifts and calls are refering to the soon to be elect, but at that time present enemies of the Christians whom God could and would yet graff into the olive tree, Just as Paul was once an enemy of the Gospel. The restored nation Idea in this passage is also defeated by Gal 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
The passage in Isaiah 59 further supports the Salvation and new covenant aspect that came through Christ and even affirms the vengence and destruction to occur on the enemies.
Now the next verse offers some difficulties.
Is 59:19. So shall they fear
The name of the LORD from the west,
And His glory from the rising of the sun;
When the enemy comes in like a flood,
The Spirit of the LORD will lift up a standard against him.
If we take away the comma after flood and add a period, and seperate the next sentence in thought, then the 'him" could refer to the serpent in verse 5.
They hatch vipers' eggs and weave the spider's web;
He who eats of their eggs dies,
(Beware the yeast of the Pharisees)
And
from that which is crushed a viper breaks out.
I'll have to check into the rythm of the previous verses.
The other thought is that the first 3 verses of 59:19 are together with the second 2 revering to the enemies of Christ which would be those who crucified him and all who wish to suppress truth. And this would refer back to vs 5.
So shall they fearThe name of the LORD from the west,
And His glory from the rising of the sun;
When the enemy comes in like a flood,
(this would refer to Jesus' enemies who crucified him in unbelief, not the Roman armies)
The Spirit of the LORD will lift up a standard against him.(the serpent)
I'm not sure if this would be referring to the cross, or to the Roman standards, but it could be either. I think it might be refering to the cross as the Standard of Jesus atoning death by which there is no more condemnation.