This article from Australia’s National Broadcasting Service might have slipped past the censorship. It talks of the same evidence being presented now, it refers to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth whose numbers have multiplied 10-fold since it was written.
Unanswered 9/11 questions - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Tanj - the grammar is ‘compelled’ by weight of evidence.
So many posted on this thread that there was no evidence of explosives used at the WTC.
Well here’s a thought experiment: Imagine spending a week interviewing 118 first responders, FDNY and NYPD officers who were eye and ear witnesses to explosions through those 3 skyscrapers including particularly in the basements as prelude to demolition.
Also imagine sitting with the chemistry and physics professors in their labs analysing the dust samples of the WTC towers and finding military grade nanothermite in all samples and their findings being published in a prominent peer reviewed chemistry journal.
Also imagine having a discussion with the chief architect of the twin towers who said unequivocally “those planes could not bring down those towers” (in the documentary ‘9/11 explosive evidence’ by AE911TRUTH). He would explain to you how the steel frame design was to withstand just such plane hitting skyscraper events.
Watch with your own eyes the evidence of molten steel.
And then watch the official government official at NIST deny any evidence of explosives or of molten steel.
Video of both is in several of the 55 documentaries linked above, particularly the one by AE911TRUTH.
And see if denial can guard you from cognitive dissonance after doing that...
This post was absolutely news worthy and was originally on the news and current events board.
The US Attorney for New York was forced/compelled/persuaded (whatever verb you think fits best) to empanel a grand jury (over a year of expensive hearings) to examine evidence of controlled demolitions of the three WTC skyscrapers. That is newsworthy just like it was when AE911TRUTH first revealed the info and Australian ABC reported it.
This time, after nearly two decades of Patriot Act and restrictions on media, it was not reported by any of the mainstream media - go research ‘Operation Mockingbird’ for God’s sake - and I say that with reverence. The mods moved it to the kitchen sink - what motive? Ignorance, denial, lack of courage, Stockholm syndrome? Don’t you know opinion polls show less than 50% of people in the US believe the official story on 9/11? And far far less believe it in Middle East countries that were victims of the subsequent regime change wars.
The CIA tweeted recently it has agents everywhere, at all levels of society. Does Operation Mockingbird extend to gatekeeper activity on Internet forums?Research that and you’ll find plenty to think about.