Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I said what the point is:theFijian said:So what exactly is the point of these 'Battle of the Bands'? Purely to see who is the most popular and not neccesarily the most talented? A don't think a lot of people realise this hence the recent agro.
Andy
ps139 said:Dont dispute tastes. Its pointless. Its like arguing that chocolate is better than vanilla. People's ears as well as taste buds are tuned different, that is how it is.
ps139 said:Not even close![]()
Hey I'm all for fun my friend, I've had my fun only participating in votes where I know anything about the bands.ps139 said:I said what the point is:
We are doing this for fun, to talk about music, for people to listen to bands they might not have listened to otherwise. If you have a problem dont participate.
All for FUN.
To find out about bands you dont know well
To find out interesting things about bands
To find out their influences, albums, history etc.
All for fun.
There is no way that we can have some sort of screening process that says "Vote for who is the best/most talented/most this/most that and do not vote for just whoever you like the best." I think that people have been voting really honestly lately as seen in the Floyd v. DMB battle. There isnt a way we can restrict this to "qualified" voters, however that would be defined. And there is no reason to, it is all for fun.
How about a 'Batle of the Solo Artists'? No alliteration though.ps139 said:I respect and thank you for doing that and I wish everyone did that too.
KristianJ said:If I had the time I'd find one for you, Bill.![]()
Its a good idea that I've been thinking about too. I see some problems but we might be able to work through them. I think that once the battle of the bands is over, probably next week, we should start discussing it.theFijian said:How about a 'Batle of the Solo Artists'? No alliteration though.
ps139 said:Its a good idea that I've been thinking about too. I see some problems but we might be able to work through them. I think that once the battle of the bands is over, probably next week, we should start discussing it.
I guess just having released material as a solo artist, with no kinda official affiliations with a backing group but just session musicians as it were. Give me some omre time to think about that.ps139 said:Honestly I had no idea who Van Morrison was and I thought "it"" was a group, thats the only reason he was in there.
My problem is: how do we define a solo artist?
They all have bands, well most of them do. Like Jimi. He had Noel Redding, one of the best bassists ever. And his band in the beginning was the Jimi Hendrix Experience. Did he ever go totally solo? Not that I know of.... Billy Joel always had a band, so did Zappa, so does Trey Anastasio (Band), Van Halen, etc etc. And what makes the Dave Matthews Band different than Frank Zappa? The absence of the word "band" at the end of the artist name??? So my problem is where do we draw the line? I have not been able to figure this out yet. Please let me know if you've got some solid criteria.