GOP: We know Joe Biden is corrupt even if there is no evidence of it!

[NxNW]

The DOJ spent 5 years investigating Hunter Biden before bringing charges I don’t remember seeing any of these concerns about the length of that investigation

So why keep bringing him up?

 

[BPPLEE]

I agree, Hunter has been treated unfairly.

Yes he has. He shouldn’t have to pay his father’s bills or give him part of his salary

 

[Pommer]

A bunch of spin from left wing news sources is about as far from fact as you can get. Is there even one of those left wing news organizations that was not involved in the Hunter Biden laptop denial hoax? The fact is that the White House had used executive privilege to withhold hundreds of emails about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s business dealings. Additionally, the Bidens are not cooperating in revealing what they did to earn the millions of dollars in foreign money that came through shell companies.

Yes, forget about all of the internal links to facts, it’s a lefty-news source and be ignored.
This is pathetic in its ignorance.

 

[Valletta]

Yes, forget about all of the internal links to facts, it’s a lefty-news source and be ignored.
This is pathetic in its ignorance.

As I said, It's SPIN, not facts. I look at plenty of left-wing news and have worked with them on many stories. Remember, the impeachment inquiry is just beginning, now Congress should be able to get past the stonewalling. They need to look at the bank records of all of the Bidens involved and see, for example, how money was given to Joe. Was it household expenses or repairs as Hunter had indicated? They need to get past the "presidential privilege" claim for the withholding all of those emails and also examine the grand jury testimony. Then Congress can call the Bidens to testify and give them a chance to tell their side of the story.

 

[Pommer]

As I said, It's SPIN, not facts. I look at plenty of left-wing news and have worked with them on many stories. Remember, the impeachment inquiry is just beginning, now Congress should be able to get past the stonewalling. They need to look at the bank records of all of the Bidens involved and see, for example, how money was given to Joe. Was it household expenses or repairs as Hunter had indicated? They need to get past the "presidential privilege" claim for the withholding all of those emails and also examine the grand jury testimony. Then Congress can call the Bidens to testify and give them a chance to tell their side of the story.

The internal links are not spin but go to the relevant agencies which have made facts available, but no, you can’t even address them just blanket the entire things as “spin”.
I understand completely your refusal to take a gander at things that go against your entire argument. The cognitive dissonance must be excruciating.

 

[BPPLEE]

The internal links are not spin but go to the relevant agencies which have made facts available, but no, you can’t even address them just blanket the entire things as “spin”.
I understand completely your refusal to take a gander at things that go against your entire argument. The cognitive dissonance must be excruciating.

Would you accept the material if it came from Fox News?

 

[SimplyMe]

As I said, It's SPIN, not facts. I look at plenty of left-wing news and have worked with them on many stories. Remember, the impeachment inquiry is just beginning, now Congress should be able to get past the stonewalling. They need to look at the bank records of all of the Bidens involved and see, for example, how money was given to Joe. Was it household expenses or repairs as Hunter had indicated? They need to get past the "presidential privilege" claim for the withholding all of those emails and also examine the grand jury testimony. Then Congress can call the Bidens to testify and give them a chance to tell their side of the story.

As I pointed out on the impeachment thread, the impeachment committee will be unable to send out subpoenas that are legally enforceable, not until the House has voted to start impeachment proceedings. Interestingly, this is due to the DoJ under Trump, which was trying to protect Pres. Trump from the impeachment committee. So this impeachment committee is meaningless and has no power, not until McCarthy can get Congress to vote to open impeachment -- which he either doesn't want to do or doesn't believe he can get enough votes to pass.

 

[Valletta]

As I pointed out on the impeachment thread, the impeachment committee will be unable to send out subpoenas that are legally enforceable, not until the House has voted to start impeachment proceedings. Interestingly, this is due to the DoJ under Trump, which was trying to protect Pres. Trump from the impeachment committee. So this impeachment committee is meaningless and has no power, not until McCarthy can get Congress to vote to open impeachment -- which he either doesn't want to do or doesn't believe he can get enough votes to pass.

McCarthy followed the actions of Nancy Pelosi. Offhand I don't know that it makes a legal difference whether there is a vote of the whole House or not.

 

[Valletta]

The internal links are not spin but go to the relevant agencies which have made facts available, but no, you can’t even address them just blanket the entire things as “spin”.
I understand completely your refusal to take a gander at things that go against your entire argument. The cognitive dissonance must be excruciating.

Obviously I looked. What the document does is cherry pick statements without the whole context, frame (spin) their own version of what and why Republicans supposedly make a claim (omitting key information) and then give us links. I'm glad to discuss particular points that you have some familiarity with, I'm not here to review lengthy articles or books. It would be easy to give you a link to such and say "Here, this book or magazine or long article refutes everything you say." That's not a discussion.

 

[Pommer]

Obviously I looked. What the document does is cherry pick statements without the whole context, frame (spin) their own version of what and why Republicans supposedly make a claim (omitting key information) and then give us links. I'm glad to discuss particular points that you have some familiarity with, I'm not here to review lengthy articles or books. It would be easy to give you a link to such and say "Here, this book or magazine or long article refutes everything you say." That's not a discussion.

Well, your overall point is valid, but neither do I expect other posters to do the actual work of tracking down the posts that were aggregated in the mediaite link and post those along with a synopsis of what they entail, because they’d get the same treatment, “out of context” and “just spin” from people who are invested in the propaganda that “the Bidens are ‘the real crime family’!”.

 

[KCfromNC]

The DOJ spent 5 years investigating Hunter Biden before bringing charges I don’t remember seeing any of these concerns about the length of that investigation

It might be interesting to do a bit of introspection about the differences between the two. For example, was anyone promising to impeach Hunter for high crimes and misdemeanors committed in office on his first day in office?

 

[BPPLEE]

It might be interesting to do a bit of introspection about the differences between the two. For example, was anyone promising to impeach Hunter for high crimes and misdemeanors committed in office on his first day in office?

A more realistic comparison would be how Trump was treated compared to Biden

 

[Matt5]

Democrats Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Bank Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions For Them To Believe Biden Did Anything Wrong | Babylon Bee

Democrats Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Bank Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions For Them To Believe Biden Did Anything Wrong

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As evidence of bribery and corruption by the Biden family continues to mount, Democrat lawmakers in the nation's capital have expressed heavy skepticism, saying they will need a lot more than just eyewitnesses, financial records, audio and video recordings, and admissions of...

babylonbee.com

 

[NxNW]

Yes he has. He shouldn’t have to pay his father’s bills or give him part of his salary

Who said he has to?

 

[NxNW]

A more realistic comparison would be how Trump was treated compared to Biden

They've both gotten all the indictments they deserve; how is that unfair?

 

[NxNW]

Democrats Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Bank Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions For Them To Believe Biden Did Anything Wrong | Babylon Bee

Democrats Say It’ll Take A Lot More Than Eyewitness Testimony, Bank Records, Audio, Video, Complete Confessions For Them To Believe Biden Did Anything Wrong

WASHINGTON, D.C. — As evidence of bribery and corruption by the Biden family continues to mount, Democrat lawmakers in the nation's capital have expressed heavy skepticism, saying they will need a lot more than just eyewitnesses, financial records, audio and video recordings, and admissions of...

babylonbee.com

Democrats keep asking for actual evidence, and Republicans keep not producing it.

 

[KCfromNC]

A more realistic comparison would be how Trump was treated compared to Biden

And yet you brought up Hunter Biden for some reason.

 

[USincognito]

I’m not an elected official whose family have become millionaires by receiving money from foreign governments without doing any work for the money and laundering it through shell companies
And you are not in a position to investigate anything.Your suggestion is ludicrous

We have no way of knowing that unless you post your taxes here do can investigate for ourselves.

You have nothing to hide, right?

 

[JustOneWay]

I’m not an elected official whose family have become millionaires by receiving money from foreign governments without doing any work for the money and laundering it through shell companies
And you are not in a position to investigate anything.Your suggestion is ludicrous

Joe Biden was a private citizen at the time he is accused of bribes who did' according to you, and laundered money. There is no evidence for this, of course, so how are you so sure as to accuse the President of the United States of crimes without any evidence?

 

[BPPLEE]

We have no way of knowing that unless you post your taxes here do can investigate for ourselves.

You have nothing to hide, right?

You have no authority to make such a request and the forum is not a government entity or law enforcement agency the analogy fails and is beyond ridiculous