GOP: We know Joe Biden is corrupt even if there is no evidence of it!

[KCfromNC]

Then you should welcome the investigation so that the Republicans just come up empty and embarrass themselves.

The GOP hearings so far have been fun. I mean, we've learned it was Mr. Trumps administration which was trying to censor social media posts, testimony that Biden had nothing to do with his son's business, and so on and so forth. I'm sure the GOP is trying their hardest, but bless their hearts, they're just not very good at this.
At least the GOP in the 90s was able to dig up some sort of totally unrelated dirt on Clinton. But now it really feels like they're just out of steam. Maybe abandoning any sort of intellectual approach to governing does have consequences?

Why oppose an investigation if there’s nothing to hide?

Please post your tax returns for the last 10 years here. It can be as a response to this post or start a separate thread so we don't get to off topic.

I mean, certainly you wouldn't be opposed if you have nothing to hide.

 

[BPPLEE]

The GOP hearings so far have been fun. I mean, we've learned it was Mr. Trumps administration which was trying to censor social media posts, testimony that Biden had nothing to do with his son's business, and so on and so forth. I'm sure the GOP is trying their hardest, but bless their hearts, they're just not very good at this.
At least the GOP in the 90s was able to dig up some sort of totally unrelated dirt on Clinton. But now it really feels like they're just out of steam. Maybe abandoning any sort of intellectual approach to governing does have consequences?


Please post your tax returns for the last 10 years here. It can be as a response to this post or start a separate thread so we don't get to off topic.

I mean, certainly you wouldn't be opposed if you have nothing to hide.

The IRS is welcome to them anytime they like

 

[KCfromNC]

The IRS is welcome to them anytime they like

Seems like an attempt to sidestep posting them here for us to investigate. Why would that be, "if there’s nothing to hide?"

 

[BPPLEE]

Seems like an attempt to sidestep posting them here for us to investigate. Why would that be, "if there’s nothing to hide?"

I’m not an elected official whose family have become millionaires by receiving money from foreign governments without doing any work for the money and laundering it through shell companies
And you are not in a position to investigate anything.Your suggestion is ludicrous

 

[NxNW]

Numerous witnesses have come forward with information that Joe Biden committed bribery.

No they haven't.

The Republicans could hardly let two impeachment attempts (one even after Trump left office!) on fake charges take place while neglecting to even have an inquiry about Joe

What fake charges?

when lies and mounds of evidence exist

If there was evidence, they'd impeach and have a trial, don't you think?

 

[NxNW]

I’m not an elected official whose family have become millionaires by receiving money from foreign governments without doing any work for the money and laundering it through shell companies

Neither am I. Do you have a point?

 

[NxNW]

The GOP hearings so far have been fun. I mean, we've learned it was Mr. Trumps administration which was trying to censor social media posts, testimony that Biden had nothing to do with his son's business, and so on and so forth. I'm sure the GOP is trying their hardest, but bless their hearts, they're just not very good at this.

As Homer Simpson said, "You tried and you failed. The lesson is: never try."

 

[BPPLEE]

No they haven't.

What fake charges?

If there was evidence, they'd impeach and have a trial, don't you think?

So they are having an inquiry to determine if there is evidence to proceed. That seems like the proper way to go about it instead of jumping the gun and going straight to trial. I don’t see why this is a problem

 

[BPPLEE]

Neither am I. Do you have a point?

Why should I post my tax records? It’s a ridiculous suggestion

 

[SimplyMe]

So they are having an inquiry to determine if there is evidence to proceed. That seems like the proper way to go about it instead of jumping the gun and going straight to trial. I don’t see why this is a problem

I thought that was the purpose of the investigation they've been doing the last 9 months.

 

[BPPLEE]

I thought that was the purpose of the investigation they've been doing the last 9 months.

9 months is nothing compared to the 5 years the DOJ spent investigating Hunter Biden before bringing any charges.

 

[USincognito]

I don’t think anyone is going to Biden’s house and looking for crimes. They are doing an inquiry. I don’t think that includes a search warrant for Biden’s residence

I guess you failed Analogy 101 in college.

Just substitute all personal communication, banking transactions, phone call records, personal expenditures, etc. for "house" and try again.

 

[KCfromNC]

I’m not an elected official whose family have become millionaires by receiving money from foreign governments without doing any work for the money and laundering it through shell companies

Then you and Biden have one thing in common.

And you are not in a position to investigate anything.Your suggestion is ludicrous

GOP clown parade so far, I'm not convinced that "not in a position to investigate" is really the standard you want to go with here.

But in any case, it seems we now understand there are reasons for not cooperating with an investigation aside from the previous guess of having something to hide.

 

[KCfromNC]

As Homer Simpson said, "You tried and you failed. The lesson is: never try."

If only the House GOP would get the hint.

 

[KCfromNC]

Why should I post my tax records? It’s a ridiculous suggestion

Why oppose an investigation if there’s nothing to hide?

Anyone else seeing mixed messages here?

 

[KCfromNC]

I thought that was the purpose of the investigation they've been doing the last 9 months.

But those didn't give the answers they were wishing for.

 

[BPPLEE]

Anyone else seeing mixed messages here?

No. One has nothing to do with the other. The forum is not a governing body or law enforcement agency.
The mixed messages are how you want Trump treated compared to Biden

 

[BPPLEE]

I guess you failed Analogy 101 in college.

Just substitute all personal communication, banking transactions, phone call records, personal expenditures, etc. for "house" and try again.

How about choose an analogy between things that are actually comparable, not apples to oranges

 

[BPPLEE]

But those didn't give the answers they were wishing for.

The DOJ spent 5 years investigating Hunter Biden before bringing charges I don’t remember seeing any of these concerns about the length of that investigation

 

[NxNW]

9 months is nothing compared to the 5 years the DOJ spent investigating Hunter Biden before bringing any charges.

I agree, Hunter has been treated unfairly.