If a mad scientist created a murderous robot, would it be the robot's fault he was programmed to kill or the scientist who designed it?
Here, God is the scientist. He created us and gave us the capacity to do bad, evil, harmful, etc. He could have easily made it impossible for humans to be evil or bad. But he didn't.
Not only that but he also created the environment that led A&E to temptation. First by putting an illegal fruit bearing tree in the Garden, (Why?) then by putting a conniving, talking serpent in the Garden that would lead A&E into temptation.
Keep in mind, they don't yet have the ability to discern right from wrong. They had to mess up first before they could realize they shouldn't have done that.
If all this is literally true, then that was a pretty evil thing God did by setting A&E up for a failure that they could never avoid.
I mean... Let's say they weren't supposed to do that. Now let's say they didn't break any of the rules. What would then be the point of Christ? There would be no need for a savior if A&E had never eaten from the tree.
God wanted us to fail in Eden. That's about all I could make out of that story.