• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Good and Evil

BL2KTN

Scholar, Author, Educator
Oct 22, 2010
2,109
83
Tennessee, United States
✟25,644.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Libertarian
Feldon said:
If God created you, and you then create evil... is that on you? Or should God be blamed for the sins of man, as well as the sins of Satan?

I thought sin entered the world through Adam? How can Satan sin if Satan wasn't part of the fall? If he was part of the fall, why doesn't he die like all other creatures, along with all his demons?
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
If God created you, and you then create evil... is that on you? Or should God be blamed for the sins of man, as well as the sins of Satan?

Depends on whether or not you consider god omniscient and omnipotent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: quatona
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Evil cannot exist within itself. The thing must first be good to become evil.

Doesn't mean evil ever has to exist. Also, you are forgetting being neutral, which is neither good nor evil, or can also be being both good and evil.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,275
29,006
LA
✟648,914.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
If God created you, and you then create evil... is that on you? Or should God be blamed for the sins of man, as well as the sins of Satan?
If a mad scientist created a murderous robot, would it be the robot's fault he was programmed to kill or the scientist who designed it?

Here, God is the scientist. He created us and gave us the capacity to do bad, evil, harmful, etc. He could have easily made it impossible for humans to be evil or bad. But he didn't.

Not only that but he also created the environment that led A&E to temptation. First by putting an illegal fruit bearing tree in the Garden, (Why?) then by putting a conniving, talking serpent in the Garden that would lead A&E into temptation.

Keep in mind, they don't yet have the ability to discern right from wrong. They had to mess up first before they could realize they shouldn't have done that.

If all this is literally true, then that was a pretty evil thing God did by setting A&E up for a failure that they could never avoid.

I mean... Let's say they weren't supposed to do that. Now let's say they didn't break any of the rules. What would then be the point of Christ? There would be no need for a savior if A&E had never eaten from the tree.

God wanted us to fail in Eden. That's about all I could make out of that story.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,275
29,006
LA
✟648,914.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
If the starting point is neutral then there is no good or evil. Evil is a perversion of good. If something is deemed evil it still has good in it. Only when that thing ceases to exist can it be void of good.
What is considered "good" or "evil" depends entirely on who's asking the question. What some consider good or not evil, others might find completely reprehensible. What you might think of as evil, others might disagree and not see it that way.

Good and evil don't actually exist objectively because whats what depends entirely on the observer.
 
Upvote 0

Feldon

Newbie
Jul 1, 2014
86
3
34
✟22,728.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
If a mad scientist created a murderous robot, would it be the robot's fault he was programmed to kill or the scientist who designed it?

Here, God is the scientist. He created us and gave us the capacity to do bad, evil, harmful, etc. He could have easily made it impossible for humans to be evil or bad. But he didn't.

Not only that but he also created the environment that led A&E to temptation. First by putting an illegal fruit bearing tree in the Garden, (Why?) then by putting a conniving, talking serpent in the Garden that would lead A&E into temptation.

Keep in mind, they don't yet have the ability to discern right from wrong. They had to mess up first before they could realize they shouldn't have done that.

If all this is literally true, then that was a pretty evil thing God did by setting A&E up for a failure that they could never avoid.

I mean... Let's say they weren't supposed to do that. Now let's say they didn't break any of the rules. What would then be the point of Christ? There would be no need for a savior if A&E had never eaten from the tree.

God wanted us to fail in Eden. That's about all I could make out of that story.

Free will is not free of consequences.

Implicit in free will is freedom. Freedom to glorify, freedom to sin.

If humans have free will, why not Angels?
 
Upvote 0

Feldon

Newbie
Jul 1, 2014
86
3
34
✟22,728.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
I thought sin entered the world through Adam? How can Satan sin if Satan wasn't part of the fall? If he was part of the fall, why doesn't he die like all other creatures, along with all his demons?

Sin literally "entered" the world when Adam sinned, because Adam was the first man. That doesn't mean that the concept of sin didn't exist before Adam.

There's more to this universe than just us humans, you know.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,275
29,006
LA
✟648,914.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Free will is not free of consequences.

Implicit in free will is freedom. Freedom to glorify, freedom to sin.

If humans have free will, why not Angels?
I don't believe we have total freewill either. Everything you think you are deciding on your own is a product of your culture, environment, given circumstances, upbringing, personal convictions... etc. No one is truly free to decide everything for themselves.
 
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
26,275
29,006
LA
✟648,914.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I believe God is infinite.

That doesn't mean His creations are infinite.

No but if that's the case, he definitely made us limited in our understanding. Therefore, he can't really fault us for not matching his perfect wisdom. We were never meant to.
 
Upvote 0

BL2KTN

Scholar, Author, Educator
Oct 22, 2010
2,109
83
Tennessee, United States
✟25,644.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Libertarian
Feldon said:
Sin literally "entered" the world when Adam sinned, because Adam was the first man. That doesn't mean that the concept of sin didn't exist before Adam.

There's more to this universe than just us humans, you know.

Define world... apparently there's more to it than the "heavens and the earth" in the bible.
 
Upvote 0

Feldon

Newbie
Jul 1, 2014
86
3
34
✟22,728.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
I don't believe we have total freewill either. Everything you think you are deciding on your own is a product of your culture, environment, given circumstances, upbringing, personal convictions... etc. No one is truly free to decide everything for themselves.

That's true, only God has infinite Free Will.

Don't see how that negates the price -- and horror -- of human Free Will. Otherwise, there would be a lot fewer people in our prisons...
 
Upvote 0

Feldon

Newbie
Jul 1, 2014
86
3
34
✟22,728.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
Define world... apparently there's more to it than the "heavens and the earth" in the bible.
What I mean is that Adam was the first man, and therefore the first man to sin.

That doesn't mean the concept/reality of sin was "invented" by Adam. Why would we assume that? There certainly seems to be non-earthbound creations referenced in the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Feldon

Newbie
Jul 1, 2014
86
3
34
✟22,728.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Private
No but if that's the case, he definitely made us limited in our understanding. Therefore, he can't really fault us for not matching his perfect wisdom. We were never meant to.

Maybe our goal isn't to "match" God. That would be awfully arrogant.

Maybe our goal is to love our brothers & sisters, cherish our blessings, thank the Almighty for our gifts, and make the best decisions we can -- as fallible, flawed, sinful, finite creatures?
 
Upvote 0

BL2KTN

Scholar, Author, Educator
Oct 22, 2010
2,109
83
Tennessee, United States
✟25,644.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Libertarian
Feldon said:
What I mean is that Adam was the first man, and therefore the first man to sin.

That doesn't mean the concept/reality of sin was "invented" by Adam. Why would we assume that? There certainly seems to be non-earthbound creations referenced in the Bible.

Because the bible says that death entered the world through Adam's sin. Why were other things sinning and death not being the result? And how bad would it suck to be the guy whose sin condemned everybody to being set on fire... and people are all like, "what the heck did you do? Seriously???" "Oh, I ate a magic fruit." "You condemned us all to being set on fire for a trillion years for eating a magic fruit..." "Yeah, I don't really have this whole God's justice thing figured out yet. I was thinking bad heartburn or something for the fruit, but no, he's planning on setting us all on fire unless he kills hiimself for us."
 
Upvote 0