- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,404
- 27,063
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Your responses still assume that I’m saying God forced men to do certain things. That is not my position. My position is that God decrees all things to happen.First, let’s suppose, just for the sake of argument, that God did plan and render certain (as its ultimate cause but through secondary causes) the specific acts of the men who crucified Jesus. That in no way implies that every wicked act is planned and rendered certain by God.
2nd, is it necessarily the case that in order for God to have planned and rendered certain the crucifixion, God had to actually cause certain men to crucify Jesus? That’s a false assumption.
Suppose God wanted Jesus to be crucified in a particular place and at a particular time. Was his only recourse to pick certain individuals and cause them to crucify Jesus? Not at all! The triumphal entry into Jerusalem guaranteed that someone would crucify Jesus. But God did not have to inspire or manipulate or coerce any particular individuals to do it.
There are many ways around interpreting Acts 2:23 in the traditional Calvinist manner. No Church father of the first three centuries interpreted it that way (so far as I know). I wonder what Calvinists think about Church fathers like Irenaeus who clearly did not believe what Calvinists believe about God’s sovereignty. And yet he is a third generation Christian, taught the Christian faith by Polycarp, who was taught it by John — who forgot all about God’s absolute, determinative sovereignty between John and Irenaeus? Not.
The crucifixion, for example, had to happen a certain way at a certain time. Chance had no part in it. So in whatever way God works, He worked it so that it happened the way it did. So my argument is exactly what scripture says.
this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death.
— Acts 2:23
Upvote
0
