God's creation Timeline refutes evolution

[Aman777]

I thought you claimed man came from lower creatures?

Completely false since I have always posted that Adam was first made, billions of years, in man's time, BEFORE any other living creature. Trump and evolutionists are the ones who claim Humans are evolved animals. God tells us that we are His children.

That's WHY evolutionists are wrong, since they CANNOT explain How or When we magically changed from animal to Human intelligence, which is like God's intelligence. Genesis 3:22 They falsely teach that we magically evolved God's superior intelligence from mindless Nature. God's Truth shows that we inherited Adam's intelligence through Noah.

 

[dad]

I like baloney. Please try a little harder to refute me. (prove me wrong Scripturally). I don't think you can. In fact, you and I both know that you cannot. Giving up by posting "Baloney" is a weak argument and unworthy of anything but bluff. Man up and give us a reason to believe you.

Sorry if you had the notion that I could not sweep up your arguments biblicaliy. Your claims are so far out in la la land I do not find it worthwhile.

You refuse to answer questions and when you do you seem to obfuscate and divert. Simple questions like how many millions of years do you claim Adam lived? Do you claim man mated with planet of the ape type creatures? Do you think modern man is descended from animals?

 

[dad]

Completely false since I have always posted that Adam was first made, billions of years, in man's time, BEFORE any other living creature. Trump and evolutionists are the ones who claim Humans are evolved animals. God tells us that we are His children.

That's WHY evolutionists are wrong, since they CANNOT explain How or When we magically changed from animal to Human intelligence, which is like God's intelligence. Genesis 3:22 They falsely teach that we magically evolved God's superior intelligence from mindless Nature. God's Truth shows that we inherited Adam's intelligence through Noah.

You disavow Gen 1 then, cause it says man was made after birds and fish etc.

 

[The Barbarian]

You disavow Gen 1 then, cause it says man was made after birds and fish etc.

Genesis 1 also records morning and evening before there was a sun. That's a hint for anyone who might be inclined to take a figurative account for a literal history.

 

[dad]

Genesis 1 also records morning and evening before there was a sun. That's a hint for anyone who might be inclined to take a figurative account for a literal history.

Yes, I get it...science is wrong.

 

[The Barbarian]

(Barbaian notes that the text of Genesis itself tells us that it's not a literal history)

Yes, I get it...science is wrong.

Sorry, you're wrong. Science never tried to revise Genesis into a literal history.

 

[dad]

(Barbaian notes that the text of Genesis itself tells us that it's not a literal history)



Sorry, you're wrong. Science never tried to revise Genesis into a literal history.

No, it cooked up a different creation story. It is wrong.

 

[The Barbarian]

No, it cooked up a different creation story.

Nope. Science does just fine with the creation story as it is. It doesn't do so well with the revision made by YE creationists. But that's their problem, not science's problem.

 

[Aman777]

You refuse to answer questions and when you do you seem to obfuscate and divert.

It's really confusing for religionists who cannot support their views with chapter and verse. The Bible tells us they will be that way. 1Co 2:14

Simple questions like how many millions of years do you claim Adam lived?

I have never claimed that Adam lived for millions of years. Adam lived for BILLIONS of years. After Eve was made and Adam was "created" by the Trinity, he and Eve lived for 930 years. Genesis 5:5 Adam lived in a perfect body, like the O.T. Body of Jesus, and like Christians will have in Heaven, 1Jo 3:2 until he disobeyed God's Law.

Do you claim man mated with planet of the ape type creatures?

Noah's grandsons did UNLESS you can post Scripture which shows us where they found their wives. Like Cain, on Adam's Earth, there were NO other Humans (descendants of Adam) to marry. You calling the sons of God, Apes does NOT make it so since Christians are also called the sons of God AFTER they are born again Spiritually. 1Jo 3:2

Do you think modern man is descended from animals?

No, but modern man contains the DNA of the sons of God who numbered some 1 million when the Ark arrived here. In your religion/belief, please explain HOW that DNA got into our genetics.

 

[Aman777]

You disavow Gen 1 then, cause it says man was made after birds and fish etc.

False, since Adam was "formed" from the dust by Lord God/Jesus on the 3rd Day BEFORE the plants herbs and rain. Genesis 2:4-7
This means that Adam was there when Lord God/Jesus made the beasts of the field and birds and Adam NAMED them Genesis 2:19 on the 6th Day.
Adam was also there to donate a rib for Lord God/Jesus to use to make Eve Genesis 2:22 on the 6th Day/Age.

AFTER Adam sinned and had Cain and Abel, he and Eve were BOTH "created" in God's Image or Spiritually in Christ, by God the Trinity, Genesis 1:27 Genesis 5:1-2 AND John 14:16 on the present 6th Day, the Day of Salvation according to the Lord. Isa 49:8 2Co 6:2

IOW, Adam was FIRST made, BEFORE the beginning of our Universe Genesis 2:4 which was some 13.8 Billion years ago, in man's time. That's God's Truth Scripturally which no one can refute. Amen?

 

[dad]

Nope. Science does just fine with the creation story as it is. It doesn't do so well with the revision made by YE creationists. But that's their problem, not science's problem.

No Adam no garden man from ape like thingies. .No eve..no serpent...no real creation by God...sure..scince does fine...for liars.

 

[dad]

False, since Adam was "formed" from the dust by Lord God/Jesus on the 3rd Day BEFORE the plants herbs and rain. Genesis 2:4-7
This means that Adam was there when Lord God/Jesus made the beasts of the field and birds and Adam NAMED them Genesis 2:19 on the 6th Day.
Adam was also there to donate a rib for Lord God/Jesus to use to make Eve Genesis 2:22 on the 6th Day/Age.

AFTER Adam sinned and had Cain and Abel, he and Eve were BOTH "created" in God's Image or Spiritually in Christ, by God the Trinity, Genesis 1:27 Genesis 5:1-2 AND John 14:16 on the present 6th Day, the Day of Salvation according to the Lord. Isa 49:8 2Co 6:2

IOW, Adam was FIRST made, BEFORE the beginning of our Universe Genesis 2:4 which was some 13.8 Billion years ago, in man's time. That's God's Truth Scripturally which no one can refute. Amen?

playing around with the word created eh?

 

[The Barbarian]

No Adam no garden man from ape like thingies.

Man is an ape-like thingy. But there's nothing in science that says there was no Adam or no garden, or no Eve or that there wasn't a serpent. And science doesn't deny God.

...sure..creationism does fine...for liars.

 

[dad]

Man is an ape-like thingy. But there's nothing in science that says there was no Adam or no garden, or no Eve or that there wasn't a serpent.

Do you think man came from apes or was created?

 

[dad]

It's really confusing for religionists who cannot support their views with chapter and verse. The Bible tells us they will be that way. 1Co 2:14



I have never claimed that Adam lived for millions of years. Adam lived for BILLIONS of years. After Eve was made and Adam was "created" by the Trinity, he and Eve lived for 930 years. Genesis 5:5 Adam lived in a perfect body, like the O.T. Body of Jesus, and like Christians will have in Heaven, 1Jo 3:2 until he disobeyed God's Law.



Noah's grandsons did UNLESS you can post Scripture which shows us where they found their wives. Like Cain, on Adam's Earth, there were NO other Humans (descendants of Adam) to marry. You calling the sons of God, Apes does NOT make it so since Christians are also called the sons of God AFTER they are born again Spiritually. 1Jo 3:2



No, but modern man contains the DNA of the sons of God who numbered some 1 million when the Ark arrived here. In your religion/belief, please explain HOW that DNA got into our genetics.

You say Adam lived for billions of years. Correct?
You say Noah had apes for offspring right?
You claim the ark arrived on planet earth and there were precisely 1 million or so..correct?

 

[dad]

False, since Adam was "formed" from the dust by Lord God/Jesus on the 3rd Day BEFORE the plants herbs and rain. Genesis 2:4-7
This means that Adam was there when Lord God/Jesus made the beasts of the field and birds and Adam NAMED them Genesis 2:19 on the 6th Day.
Adam was also there to donate a rib for Lord God/Jesus to use to make Eve Genesis 2:22 on the 6th Day/Age.

AFTER Adam sinned and had Cain and Abel, he and Eve were BOTH "created" in God's Image or Spiritually in Christ, by God the Trinity, Genesis 1:27 Genesis 5:1-2 AND John 14:16 on the present 6th Day, the Day of Salvation according to the Lord. Isa 49:8 2Co 6:2

IOW, Adam was FIRST made, BEFORE the beginning of our Universe Genesis 2:4 which was some 13.8 Billion years ago, in man's time. That's God's Truth Scripturally which no one can refute. Amen?

Just because Adam was not mentioned in gen 2 in the created order doesn't mean you toss out gen 1.

 

[The Barbarian]

Do you think man came from apes or was created?

Both. Why would it bother you if God created us that way? He says living things were brought forth by the earth.

 

[dad]

Both. Why would it bother you if God created us that way? He says living things were brought forth by the earth.

Echoing your confusion based on thinking gen 2 is some alternate creation order is getting boring.

But you admit you claim man came from apes. I think out positions are clear..no sense arguing.

 

[RealityCheck01]

Man is an ape-like thingy. But there's nothing in science that says there was no Adam or no garden, or no Eve or that there wasn't a serpent. And science doesn't deny God.

Man is classified as an actual ape, The Barbarian.

Science has evidence that Adam, Eve and the garden as in the Bible are unlikely to exist. There is no genetic bottleneck corresponding to a population of a single couple. The dominant theory of the origin of Homo sapiens is from Africa which conflicts with the usual placement of Eden in the Middle East from the Biblical place names.

There is no physical structure that allows serpents to speak. There is the problem of a grape sized brain speaking whatever language Adam and Eve spoke.

The obvious workaround is miracles or acts of God which is religion, not science.

 

[The Barbarian]

Man is classified as an actual ape, The Barbarian.

Yep. Can't get much more ape-like than that. Chimps and humans are an ingroup, with the rest of the apes an outgroup.

Science has evidence that Adam, Eve and the garden as in the Bible are unlikely to exist.

Usually a bottleneck is fatal. On the other hand, all the hamsters in the United States are genetically the descendants of a single pair taken in Syria.

There is no genetic bottleneck corresponding to a population of a single couple. The dominant theory of the origin of Homo sapiens is from Africa which conflicts with the usual placement of Eden in the Middle East from the Biblical place names.

There is no statement from the Bible that man arose in the Middle East, or that later place names were not from earlier places.

There is no physical structure that allows serpents to speak.

There's no morning or evening without a sun, either. This is why Christians generally recognize that Genesis is not a literal history.

The obvious workaround is miracles or acts of God which is religion, not science.

Well, it's not a science book, after all. And people get into all sorts of silly problems trying to make it so.